John’s Farewell Discourse under the Shadow of Mark

William Bowes

Northpoint Bible College , United States
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7676-8978


Abstract

The lengthy discourses of John’s Gospel are a feature of the Evangelist’s writing which has contributed to the idea that he wrote independently of other Gospels. The absence of such discourses in the Synoptics might suggest that John’s discourses are idiosyncratic vehicles for theologizing, wherein Jesus’ speech mirrors Johannine idiom. In this article, I re-examine Jesus’ farewell discourse in John 13–17 in light of the view that John is dependent on Mark’s Gospel. Although John 13–17 is not often considered a connection between these Gospels, I argue that John built this material from Mark 12–14, seeking to improve and expand Mark in a competitive literary marketplace and to persuade his readers to view Jesus and themselves in a particularly Johannine way. John’s compositional practices in his farewell discourse material be compared with two Jewish texts (Chronicles and Jubilees) which reinterpret earlier source material to create farewell discourses.

Keywords:

John’s Gospel, compositional practices, Jubilees, Chronicles, Mark’s Gospel, Second Temple Judaism



Ahn, S., The Persuasive Portrayal of David and Solomon in Chronicles: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Speeches and Prayers in the David-Solomon Narrative (McMaster Biblical Studies 3; Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock 2018).

Attridge, H.W., “John and other Gospels,” The Oxford Handbook of Johannine Studies (eds. J. Lieu – M.C. de Boer) (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018) 44–62. (Crossref)

Attridge, H.W., “Genre Bending in the Fourth Gospel,” Journal of Biblical Literature 121/1 (2002) 3–21. (Crossref)

Bammel, E., “The Farewell Discourse of the Evangelist John and its Jewish Heritage,” Tyndale Bulletin 44/1 (1993) 103–116. (Crossref)

Barker, J., Writing and Rewriting the Gospels: John and the Synoptics (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2025).

Bartholomä, P.F., The Johannine Discourses and the Teaching of Jesus in the Synoptics: A Contribution to the Discussion Concerning the Authenticity of Jesus’ Words in the Fourth Gospel (Texte und Arbeiten zum neutestamentlichen Zeitalter 57; Tübingen: Francke 2012). (Crossref)

Becker, E.-M., “Dating Mark and Matthew as Ancient Literature,” Mark and Matthew. I. Comparative Readings: Understanding the Earliest Gospels in Their First-Century Settings (eds. E.-M. Becker – A. Runesson) (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 271; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2011).

Becker, E.-M., “John 13 as Counter-Memory: How the Fourth Gospel Revises Early Christian Memory,” The Gospel of John as Genre Mosaic (ed. K.B. Larsen) (Studia Aarhusiana Neotestamentica 3; Göttingen – Bristol: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2015) 269–281. (Crossref)

Beutler, J., “Synoptic Jesus Tradition in the Johannine Farewell Discourse ,” Jesus in Johannine Tradition (eds. R.T. Fortna – T. Thatcher) (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox 2001) 165–174.

Bond, H.K. – Becker, E.-M. – Williams, C.H. (eds.), John’s Transformation of Mark (London – New York: Clark – Bloomsbury 2021).

Bowes, W., “The Relationship between John and the Synoptic Gospels Revisited,” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 66/1 (2024) 113–132.

Caragounis, C., “The Kingdom of God in John and the Synoptics,” John and the Synoptics (ed. A. Denaux) (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 101; Leuven: Peeters 1992) 473–480.

Cespedes, J., John’s Complementing of Mark’s Wicked Tenants Parable in his Metaphor of the True Vine (PhD Diss. Liberty University ; Lynchburg, VA 2023).

Cirafesi, W.V., “Rethinking John and ‘the Synagogue’ in Light of Expulsion from Public Assemblies in Antiquity,” Journal of Biblical Literature 142/4 (2023) 677–697. (Crossref)

Coloe, M., “Sources in the Shadows: John 13 and the Johannine Community,” New Currents through John: A Global Perspective (eds. F. Lozado – T. Thatcher) (Resources for Biblical Study 54; Atlanta, GA: SBL 2006) 69–82.

Coloe, M., “John 17:1–26: The Missionary Prayer of Jesus,” Australian Biblical Review 66 (2018) 1–12.

Corsar, E., “The Imitable Ethic of Self-Sacrificial Love: Johannine Ethics as a Reworking of Markan Ethics,” The Ethics of John: Retrospect and Prospects (eds. J. van der Watt – M. den Dulk) (Biblical Interpretation Series 227; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2025) 125–141. (Crossref)

Crawford, S.W., Rewriting Scripture in Second Temple Times ( Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2008).

De Boer, M.C., “Expulsion from the Synagogue: J.L. Martyn’s History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel Revisited,” New Testament Studies 66/3 (2020) 367–391. (Crossref)

De Boer, M.C., John 1–6 ( International Critical Commentary; London – New York: Clark – Bloomsbury 2024). (Crossref)

Dietzfelbinger, C., Der Abschied des Kommenden: Eine Auslegung der johanneischen Abschiedsreden (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 95; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1996).

Dodd, C.H., The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1968).

Dunn, J., “John and the Oral Gospel Tradition,” Jesus and the Oral Gospel Tradition (ed. H. Wansborough) (Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement 64; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1991) 351–379. (Crossref)

Endres, JC., Biblical Interpretation in the Book of Jubilees (Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 18; Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association 1987).

Engberg-Pedersen, T., John and Philosophy: A New Reading of the Fourth Gospel (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017). (Crossref)

Feník, J. – Lapko, R., “Jesus’ Inverse Transfiguration in John 13,” Neotestamentica 55/2 (2021) 347–364. (Crossref)

Foster, P., “The Rise of the Markan Priority Hypothesis and Early Responses and Challenges to It,” Theological and Theoretical Issues in the Synoptic Problem (eds. J.S. Kloppenborg – J. Verheyden) (The Library of New Testament Studies 618; London – New York: Clark – Bloomsbury 2020) 89–113. (Crossref)

Frey, J., “From the Expectation of the Imminent Kingdom to the Presence of Eternal Life: Eschatology in Mark and John,” John’s Transformation of Mark (eds. H.K. Bond – E.-M. Becker – C.H. Williams) (London – New York: Clark – Bloomsbury 2021) 169–186. (Crossref)

Goodacre, M., The Fourth Synoptic Gospel: John’s Knowledge of Matthew, Mark, and Luke (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2025).

Green, R., “John’s Use of the Synoptic Gospels and Jesus’ Farewell Prayer ( Jn 17),” Stella Maris 5/1 (2024) 13–21.

Grottoli, A., ‘But These Things Are Written’: Lives, Rewriting, and the Gospel of John (PhD Diss. University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh 2024).

Haenchen, E., John 2: A Commentary on the Gospel of John, Chapters 7–21 (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 1988).

Hanneken, T.R., The Subversion of the Apocalypses in the Book of Jubilees (Early Judaism and Its Literature; Atlanta, GA: SBL 2012). (Crossref)

Hentschel, A., Die Fußwaschungserzählung im Johannesevangelium: Ein Beitrag zur johanneischen Ekklesiologie

(Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 1/493; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2022).

Hera, M.P., Christology and Discipleship in John 17 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/342; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2013).

Hoegen-Rohls, C., Der nachösterliche Johannes: Die Abschiedsreden als hermeneutischer Schlüssel zum vierten Evangelium (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/84; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1996).

Hoglund, K., “The Priest of Praise: The Chronicler’s David,” Review & Expositor 99/2 (2002) 189–190. (Crossref)

Hutzli, J., “David in the Role of a Second Moses – The Revelation of the Temple-Model (tabnît) in 1 Chronicles 28,” Chronicles and the Priestly Literature of the Hebrew Bible (eds. J. Jeon – L.C. Jonker) (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fur die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 528; Berlin – Boston, MA : De Gruyter 2021) 322–336. (Crossref)

Instone Brewer, D., Techniques and Assumptions in Jewish Exegesis before 70 CE (Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 30; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1992).

Jennings, M., “The Fourth Gospel’s Reversal of Mark in John 13,31–14,3,” Biblica 94/2 (2013) 210–236.

Joo, S., “Past No Longer Present: Revision of David’s Legacy in Chronicles,” Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 26/2 (2012) 235 258. (Crossref)

Käsemann, E., The Testament of Jesus: A Study of the Gospel of John in the Light of Chapter 17 (London: SCM 1968).

Keener, C.S., The Gospel of John: A Commentary (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson 2005) II.

Kelly, B.E., Retribution and Eschatology in Chronicles ( Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 211; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1996).

Klein, R., 1 Chronicles: A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2006).

Kleinknecht, K., “Johannes 13, die Synoptiker und die »Methode« der johanneischen Evangelienüberlieferung,” Zeitschrift fur Theologie und Kirche 82/3 (1985) 361–388.

Kolenkow, A., “Testaments,” Early Judaism and its Modern Interpreters (eds. R.E. Kraft – G.W.E. Nickelsburg) (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress 1986) 259–267.

Larsen, K.B. (ed.), The Gospel of John as Genre Mosaic (Studia Aarhusiana Neotestamentica 3; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2015). (Crossref)

Larsen, K.B., The Lord’s Prayer in the Fourth Gospel: Jesus’ Testamentary Prayer (John 17) as Rewritten Prayer.

The Lord’s Prayer (eds. B. Langstaff – L. Stuckenbruck – M. Tilly) (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 1/490; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2022) 173–188.

Lim, T.H., The Formation of the Jewish Canon (Anchor Yale Bible Reference Library; London – New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 2013).

Lincoln, A., The Gospel according to St. John (Black’s New Testament Commentaries 4; London – New York: Continuum 2006).

Lindars, B., The Gospel of John (NCBC; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1982).

Lindenlaub, J.D., The Beloved Disciple as Interpreter and Author of Scripture in the Gospel of John (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/611; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2024). (Crossref)

Mathew, B., The Johannine Footwashing as the Sign of Perfect Love (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/464; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2018). (Crossref)

Mattila, S., “A Question Too Often Neglected,” New Testament Studies 41/2 (1995) 199–217. (Crossref)

Mroczek, E., The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016). (Crossref)

Oliver, W.H. – van Aarde, A.G., “The Community of Faith as Dwelling-Place of the Father: ‘Basileia tou Theou’ as ‘Household of God’ in the Johannine Farewell Discourse(s),” Neotestamentica 25/2 (1991) 379–399.

Petersen, A.K., “The Riverrun of Rewriting Scripture: From Textual Cannibalism to Scriptural Completion,” Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Periods 43/4–5 (2012) 475–496. (Crossref)

Porter, S., “The Date of John’s Gospel and Its Origins,” The Origins of John’s Gospel (eds. S.E. Porter – H.T. Ong) (Johannine Studies 2; Leiden: Brill 2015) 11–29. (Crossref)

Reis, D., “Jesus’ Farewell Discourse, ‘Otherness,’ and the Construction of a Johannine Identity,” Studies in Religion 32/1 (2003) 39–58. (Crossref)

Reynolds, B.E., “The Necessity of Form and Spatial Content for Defining ‘Apocalypse’ and ‘Apocalyptic’,” Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 33/3 (2024) 187–197. (Crossref)

van Ruiten, J.T.A.G.M., Abraham in the Book of Jubilees: The Rewriting of Genesis 11:26–25:10 in the Book of Jubilees 11:14–23:8 (Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 161; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2012).

Sandnes, K.O., Early Christian Discourses on Jesus’ Prayer at Gethsemane: Courageous, Committed, Cowardly? (Supplements to Novum Testamentum 166; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2016). (Crossref)

Segovia, F., The Farewell of the Word: The Johannine Call to Abide (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 1991).

Sheridan, R., “John’s Gospel and Modern Genre Theory: The Farewell Discourse ( John 13–17) as a Test Case,” Irish Theological Quarterly 75/3 (2010) 287–299. (Crossref)

Smith, D. Moody, John among the Gospels: The Relationship in Twentieth-Century Research (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 1992).

Stube, J.C., A Graeco-Roman Reading of the Farewell Discourse (The Library of New Testament Studies 309; London – New York: Clark – Bloomsbury 2006).

Thyen, H., “Johannes und die Synoptiker: Auf der Suche nach einem neuen Paradigma zur Bieschreibung ihrer Beziehungen anhand von Beobachtungen an Passions- und Ostererzählungen,” John and the Synoptics (ed. A. Denaux) (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 101; Leuven: Peeters – Leuven University Press 1992) 81–107.

Ulrich, E., The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Developmental Composition of the Bible (Supplements to Vetus Testamentum 169; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2015). (Crossref)

VanderKam, J., Jubilees: A Commentary in Two Volumes (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2018). (Crossref)

Wassell, B., “John’s Competition with the Synoptics,” From Difference to Deviance: Rivalry and Enmity in Earliest Christianity (eds. D.A. Smith – J. Verheyden) (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 339; Leuven: Peeters 2024) 139–172. (Crossref)

Williams, C., “John’s ‘Rewriting’ of Mark: Some Insights from Ancient Jewish Analogues,” John’s Transformation of Mark (eds. E.-M. Becker – H.K. Bond – C.H. Williams) (London – New York: Clark – Bloomsbury 2021) 51–66. (Crossref)

Winter, M., Das Vermächtnis Jesu und die Abschiedsworte der Väter: Gattungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung der

Vermächtnisrede im Blick auf Joh. 13–17 (Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 161; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1994).

Woll, D.B., Johannine Christianity in Conflict: Authority, Rank and Succession in the First Farewell Discourse (Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 60; Chico, CA: Scholars Press 1981).

Wray Beal, L.M., 1 & 2 Kings (Apollos Old Testament Commentary; Downers Grove, IL: IVP – Apollos 2014).

Wright, J., “The Founding Father: The Structure of the Chronicler’s David Narrative,” Journal of Biblical Literature 117/1 (1998) 55–57. (Crossref)

Yoder, K.L., “Mimesis: Foot Washing from Luke to John,” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 92/4 (2016) 655–670.

Zahn, M., Rethinking Rewritten Scripture: Composition and Exegesis in the 4QReworked Pentateuch Manuscripts (Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 95; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2011). (Crossref)

Zahn, M., Genres of Rewriting in Second Temple Judaism: Scribal Composition and Transmission (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press 2020). (Crossref)

Zsengellér, J. (ed.), Rewritten Bible after Fifty Years: Texts, Terms, or Techniques? A Last Dialogue with Geza Vermes (Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 166; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2014). (Crossref)

Download

Published
2026-01-29


Bowes, W. (2026). John’s Farewell Discourse under the Shadow of Mark. The Biblical Annals, 16(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.31743/ba.18813

William Bowes  wbowes@northpoint.edu
Northpoint Bible College https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7676-8978



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants to the Publisher of the journal „The Biblical Annals” e a non-exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Work submitted for publication, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
    a) record the Work and copy it by means of any technique (including printing and electronic recording) on all known data carriers (including IT, electronic and polygraphic), and in all IT systems (in particular those available online);
    b) enter the Work into computer memory, disseminate the Work and its copies, as well as market the Work and its copies;
    c) publicly perform, replay, display and screen the Work, as well as lend, rent and lease the Work and its copies;
    d) make available, market and disseminate the Work and its copies via IT networks, and in particular via the Internet, including the promotion or advertising of the Work, the journal or the Publisher.
  2. The Author shall further grant his/her consent for the Publisher to use and dispose of derivative works.
  3. The Publisher may sublicense the work.
  4. Third parties may use the articles and other materials containing the Works, or developed on the basis of the Works in line with the model Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also referred to as CC BY 4.0).