Retoryka i socjo-retoryka w lekturze tekstów Nowego Testamentu Cz. 2: Socjo-retoryka – projekt holistycznej lektury tekstu

Marcin Kowalski

Instytut Nauk Biblijnych KUL , Polska


Abstract: In the second part of the article on the rhetorical and socio-rhetorical reading of the New Testament texts, the author focuses on the socio-rhetorical approach. It is presented as a remedy to the fragmentary character of the sociological and anthropological studies on the Bible. The stress on the close reading of the text inherent in the socio-rhetoric gives both sociology and anthropology the anchorage they need not to stray from the main object of their inquiry. The author with broad strokes depicts the development and main concepts of the socio-rhetorical methodology. Then, he explains the six stages implied in the method: the analysis of inner texture, intertexture, social and cultural texture, ideological texture, sacred texture and the so called rhetorolects. The article finishes with the concise conclusions on the advantages of using the socio-rhetoric in comparison to the deficient and outdated historical-critical methodology.

Słowa kluczowe:

socjo-retoryka, socjologia, antropologia kulturowa, retoryka, kompozycja wewnętrzna, kompozycja interaktywna, kompozycja społeczna i kulturowa, kompozycja ideologiczna, kompozycja sakralna, retorolekt, metoda historyczno-krytyczna

Alter, R., The Art of Biblical Narrative (New York: Basic Books 1981).

Anderson, J.C. – Moore, S.D., Mark & Method. New Approaches in Biblical Studies (Minneapolis: Fortress Press 1992).

Bloomquist, L.G., „A Possible Direction for Providing Programmatic Correlation of Textures in Socio-Rhetorical Analysis”, Rhetorical Criticism of the Bible. A Comprehensive Bibliography with Notes on History and Method (red. D.F. Watson – A.J. Hauser) (BibInt 4; Leiden – New York: Brill 1994) 61-96.

Bloomquist, L.G., „Methodological Considerations in the Determination of the Social Context of Cynic Rhetorical Practice: Implications for our Present Studies of the Jesus Traditions”, The Rhetorical Analysis of Scripture. Essays from the 1995 London Conference (red. S.E. Porter – T.H. Olbricht) (JSNTSup 146; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1997) 200-231.

Bloomquist, L.G., „Methodological Criteria for the Determination of Apocalyptic Rhetoric: A Suggestion for the Expanded Use of Socio-Rhetorical Analysis”, Vision and Persuasion. Rhetorical Dimensions of Apocalyptic Discourse (red. G. Carey – L.G. Bloomquist) (St. Louis, MO: Chalice Press 1999) 181-203.

Borgen, P. – Robbins, V.K. – Gowler, D.B. (red.), Recruitment, Conquest, and Conflict. Strategies in Judaism, Early Christianity, and the Greco-Roman World (Emory Studies in Early Chris¬tianity 6; Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press 1998).

Burke, K., Counter-Statement (Los Altos, CA: Hermes Publications 21953).

Castelli, E.A., Imitating Paul. A Discourse of Power (Louisville, KY: Westminster; John Knox Press 1991).

Chatman, S.B., Story and Discourse. Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1978).

Combrink, B.H., „The Challenge of Making and Redrawing Boundaries. A Perspective on So-cio-Rhetorical Criticism” , ChallengeBoundSRC.pdf, 17. April 2016.

Combrink, B.H., „The Challenges and Opportunities of a Socio-Rhetorical Commentary”, http://, 17. April 2016.

Crossan, J.D., In Parables. The Challenge of the Historical Jesus (New York: Harper & Row 1973).

Culpepper, R.A., Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel. A Study in Literary Design (Philadelphia: For¬tress Press 1983).

Culpepper, R.A., „Mapping the Textures of New Testament Criticism. A Response to Socio-Rhe¬torical Criticism”, Journal for the Study of the New Testament 70 (1998) 71-77.

DeSilva, D.A., „A Sociorhetorical Interpretation of Revelation 14:6-13. A Call to Act Justly toward the Just and Judging God”, Bulletin for Biblical Research 9 (1999) 65-117.

DeSilva, D.A., Perseverance in Gratitude. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on the Epistle “to the Hebrews” (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2000).

Elliott, J.H., A Home for the Homeless. A Sociological Exegesis of 1 Peter, Its Situation and Strategy (Philadelphia: Fortress Press 1981).

Esler, P.F., Community and Gospel in Luke-Acts. The Social and Political Motivations of Lucan Theology (SNTSMS 57; Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press 1987).

Fauconnier, G. – Turner, M., The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities (New York: Basic Books 2002).

Flanagan, J.W., „Ancient Perceptions of Space/Perceptions of Ancient Space”, Semeia 37 (1999) 15-43.

Fowler, R.M., Let the Reader Understand. Reader-Response Criticism and the Gospel of Mark (Minneapolis: Fortress Press 1991).

Gager, J.G., Kingdom and Community. The Social World of Early Christianity (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1975).

Gager, J.G., „Shall We Marry our Enemies: Sociology and the New Testament”, Interpretation 36/3 (1982) 256-265.

Gowler, D.B., Host, Guest, Enemy, and Friend. Portraits of the Pharisees in Luke and Acts (Emory studies in early Christianity 2; New York: Peter Lang 1991).

Gowler, D.B., „The Development of Socio-Rhetorical Criticism”, New Boundaries in Old Territory. Form and Social Rhetoric in Mark (red. V.K. Robbins – D.B. Gowler) (Emory Studies in Early Christianity 3; New York: Peter Lang 1994) 1-36.

Gowler, D.B., „Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Textures of a Text and its Reception”, Journal for the Study of the New Testament 33/2 (2010) 191-206.

Gowler, D.B., „The End of the Beginning. The Continuing Maturation of Socio-Rhetorical Analy¬sis”, Sea Voyages and Beyond. Emerging Strategies in Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation (Emory Studies in Early Christianity 14; Blanford Forum, Dorset: Deo Publishing 2010).

Hock, R.F. – O’Neil, E.N., The Chreia in Ancient Rhetoric (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press 1986).

Horrell, D.G., „Ideology in Pauline Christianity A Structuration Theory Perspective”, Modelling Early Christianity. Social-Scientific Studies of the New Testament and Its Context (red. P.F. Es¬ler) (London – New York: Routledge 1995) 219-231.

Jewett, R., The Thessalonian Correspondence. Pauline Rhetoric and Millenarian Piety (Phila-delphia: Fortress Press 1986).

Lausberg, H. – Orton, D.E. – Anderson, R.D., Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. A Foundation for Literary Study (Leiden – Boston: Brill 1998).

Loubser, J.A., „Media Criticism and The Myth of Paul, The Creative Genius, and His Forgotten Co-Workers”, Neotestamentica 34/2 (2000) 329-345.

MacK, B.L., Rhetoric and the New Testament (GBS; Minneapolis: Fortress Press 1990).

Meeks, W.A., „The Man from Heaven in Johannine Sectarianism”, Journal of Biblical Literature 91/1 (1972) 44-72.

Meeks, W.A., „«Since Then You Would Need to Go Out of the World». Group Boundaries in Pauline Christianity”, Critical History and Biblical Faith. New Testament Perspectives (red. T.J. Ryan) (Villanova, PA: College Theology Society; Horizons 1979) 4-29.

Meeks, W.A., The Moral World of the First Christians (LEC 6; Philadelphia: Westminster Press 1986).

Meier, J.P., A Marginal Jew. I: The Roots of the Problem and the Person (New York: Doubleday 1991).

Papieska Komisja Biblijna, Interpretacja Pisma Świętego w Kościele (Poznań: Pallotinum 1994).

Rhoads, D.M. – Michie, D., Mark as Story. An Introduction to the Narrative of a Gospel (Phila¬delphia: Fortress Press 1982).

Robbins, V.K., „Beginnings and Developments in Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation”,

Robbins, V.K., „A Socio-Rhetorical Response: Contexts of Interaction and Forms of Exhortation”, Semeia 50 (1980) 261-271.

Robbins, V.K., „Summons and Outline in Mark. The Three-Step Progression”, Novum Testamen¬tum: 23 (1981) 97-114.

Robbins, V.K., „Mark 1.14-20. An interpretation at the intersection of Jewish and Graeco-Roman traditions”, New Testament Studies 28 (1982) 220-236.

Robbins, V.K., Jesus the Teacher. A Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation of Mark (Minneapolis: For¬tress Press 1984).

Robbins, V.K., „Rhetorical Argument about Lamps and Light in Early Christian Gospels”, Con¬text: Essays in Honor of Peder Borgen (red. P.W. Bøckman – R.E. Kristiansen) (Trondheim: Tapir 1987) 177-195.

Robbins, V.K., „The Woman who Touched Jesus’ Garment: Socio-Rhetorical Analysis of the Synoptic Accounts”, New Testament Studies 33 (1987) 502-515.

Robbins, V.K., „Foxes, Birds, Burials & Furrows”, Patterns of Persuasion in the Gospels (red. B.L. MacK – V.K. Robbins) (Santa Rosa, CA: Polebridge 1989) 69-84.

Robbins, V.K., „Luke-Acts: A Mixed Population Seeks a Home in the Roman Empire”, Images of Empire (red. L. Alexander) (JSOTSup 122; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1991) 202-221.

Robbins, V.K., „Writing as a Rhetorical Act in Plutarch and the Gospels”, Persuasive artistry. Studies in New Testament Rhetoric in Honor of George A. Kennedy (red. G.A. Kennedy – D.F. Watson) (JSNTSup 50; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1991) 157-186.

Robbins, V.K., „The Reversed Contextualization of Psalm 22 in the Markan Crucifixion: A So¬cio-Rhetorical Analysis”, The four gospels 1992. Festschrift Frans Neirynck (red. F. v an Segbroeck – F. Neirynck) (BETL 100/3; Leuven: Leuven University Press 1992) 1161-1183.

Robbins, V.K., „Progymnasmatic Rhetorical Composition and Pre-Gospel Traditions. A New Approach”, The Synoptic Gospels. Source Criticism and the New Literary Criticism (red. C. Focant) (BETL 110; Leuven: University Press; Peeters 1993) 111-147.

Robbins, V.K., „Oral, Rhetorical, and Literary Cultures. A Response”, Semeia 65 (1994) 75-91.

Robbins, V.K., „Socio-Rhetorical Criticism: Mary, Elizabeth, and the Magnificat as a Test Case”, The New Literary Criticism and the New Testament (red. E.S. Malbon – E.V. McKnight) (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press 1994) 164-209.

Robbins, V.K., „Divine Dialogue and the Lord’s Prayer. Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation of Sacred Texts”, Dialogue 28/3 (1995) 117-146.

Robbins, V.K., „Social-Scientific Criticism and Literary Studies. Prospects for Cooperation in Biblical Interpretation”, Modelling Early Christianity. Social-Scientific Studies of the New Testament and Its Context (red. P.F. Esler) (London – New York: Routledge 1995) 274-289.

Robbins, V.K., Exploring the Texture of Texts. A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press 1996).

Robbins, V.K., „Making Christian Culture in the Epistle of James”, Scriptura 59 (1996) 341-351.

Robbins, V.K., „The Dialectical Nature of Early Christian Discourse”, Scriptura 59 (1996) 353-362.

Robbins, V.K., The Tapestry of Early Christian Discourse. Rhetoric, Society, and Ideology (Lon¬don: Routledge 1996).

Robbins, V.K., „Rhetorical Composition and Sources in the Gospel of Thomas”, SBLSP 36 (1997) 86-114.

Robbins, V.K., „The Present and Future of Rhetorical Analysis”, The Rhetorical Analysis of Scrip¬ture. Essays from the 1995 London Conference (red. S.E. Porter – T.H. Olbricht) (JSNTSup 146; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1997) 24-52.

Robbins, V.K., „From Enthymeme to Theology in Luke 11:1-13”, Literary studies in Luke-Acts. Essays in honor of Joseph B. Tyson (red. J.B. Tyson – R.P. Thompson – T.E. Phillips) (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press 1998) 191-214.

Robbins, V.K., „Socio-Rhetorical Hermeneutics and Commentary”, Epi to Auto. Studies in Honour of Petr Pokorný on His Sixty-Fifth Birthday (red. J. Keřkovský – P. Pokorný) (Praha: Mlýn 1998) 284-297.

Robbins, V.K., „Rhetorical Ritual: Apocalyptic Discourse in Mark 13”, Vision and Persuasion. Rhetorical Dimensions of Apocalyptic Discourse (red. G. Carey – L.G. Bloomquist) (St. Louis, MO: Chalice Press 1999) 95-121.

Robbins, V.K., „The Claims of the Prologues and Greco-Roman Rhetoric. The Prefaces to Luke and Acts in Light of Greco-Roman Rhetorical Strategies.”, Jesus and the heritage of Israel. Luke’s Narrative Claim upon Israel’s Legacy (red. D.P. Moessner) (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press 1999) 63-83.

Robbins, V.K., „Rhetoric and Culture: Exploring Types of Cultural Rhetoric in a Text”, Rhetoric and the New Testament. Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference (red. S.E. Porter – T.H. Olbricht) (JSNTSup 90; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 2001) 443-463.

Robbins, V.K., „Argumentative Textures in Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation”, Rhetorical Ar-gumentation in Biblical Texts. Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference (red. A . E riksson – T.H. Olbricht – W.G. Übelacker) (Emory Studies in Early Christianity 8; Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press 2002) 27-65.

Robbins, V.K., „The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the Gospel of Mark”, The Intertex¬ture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament (red. D.F. Watson) (Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature 2002) 11-44.

Robbins, V.K., „The Sensory-Aesthetic Texture of the Compassionate Samaritan Parable in Luke 10”, Literary Encounters with the Reign of God (red. S.H. Ringe – H.C.P. Kim) (New York: T & T Clark 2004) 247-264.

Robbins, V.K., „Bodies and Politics in Luke 1-2 and Sirach 44-50: Men, Women, and Boys”, Scriptura 90 (2005) 824-838.

Robbins, V.K., „The Rhetorical Full-Turn in Biblical Interpretation and Its Relevance for Femi¬nist Hermeneutics”, Her Master’s Tools? Feminist and Postcolonial Engagements of Histor¬ical-Critical Discourse (red. C. Vander Stichele – T.C. Penner) (GPBS 9; Leiden – Boston: Brill 2005) 109-127.

Robbins, V.K., „Interfaces of Orality and Literature in the Gospel of Mark”, Performing the Gospel. Orality, Memory, and Mark: Essays Dedicated to Werner Kelber (red. R.A. Horsley – J.A. Draper – J.M. Foley – W.H. Kelber) (Minneapolis: Fortress Press 2006) 125-146.

Robbins, V.K., „Oral Performance in Q: Epistemology, Political Conflict, and Contextual Regis¬ter”, Oral Performance, Popular Tradition, and Hidden Transcript in Q (red. R.A. Horsley) (SemeiaSt 60; Leiden - Boston: Brill 2006) 109-122.

Robbins, V.K., „Conceptual Blending and Early Christian Imagination”, Explaining Christian Origins and Early Judaism. Contributions from Cognitive and Social Science (red. P. Luoma¬nen – I. Pyysiäinen – R. Uro) (BibInt 89; Leiden – Boston: Brill 2007) 161-195.

Robbins, V.K., „Rhetography: A New Way of Seeing the Familiar Text”, Words Well Spoken. George Kennedy’s Rhetoric of the New Testament (red. C.C. Black – D.F. Watson) (Studies in Rhetoric and Religion 8; Waco, TX: Baylor University Press 2008) 81-106.

Robbins, V.K., The Invention of Christian Discourse (Rhetoric of Religious Antiquity Series 1; Blandford Forum: Deo Pub 2009).

Robbins, V.K., Sea Voyages and Beyond. Emerging Strategies in Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation (Emory Studies in Early Christianity 14; Blanford Forum, Dorset: Deo Publishing 2010).

Robbins, V.K., „Precreation Discourse and the Nicene Creed: Christianity Finds its Voice in the Roman Empire”, Religion & Theology 18/3-4 (2011) 334-350.

Robbins, V.K. – Gowler, D.B. (red.), New Boundaries in Old Territory. Form and Social Rhetoric in Mark (Emory Studies in Early Christianity 3; New York: Peter Lang 1994).

Robbins, V.K. – Gowler, D.B. – Bloomquist, L.G. – Watson, D.F., Fabrics of Discourse. Essays in Honor of Vernon K. Robbins (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press 2003).

Roberts, K.A., „Toward a Generic Concept of Counter-Culture”, Sociological Focus 11 (1978) 111-126.

Runesson, A., Exegesis in the Making. Postcolonialism and New Testament Studies ( Leiden – Boston: Brill 2011).

Segovia, F.F., Decolonizing Biblical Studies. A View from the Margins ( Maryknoll, N Y: O rbis Books 2000).

Smith, J.Z., „The Social Description of Early Christianity”, Religious Studies Review 1 (1975) 19-25.

Smith, J.Z., Drudgery Divine. On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity (CSHJ 14; Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1990).

Tannehill, R.C., The Sword of His Mouth (SemeiaSup 1; Philadelphia: Fortress Press 1975).

Trible, P., God and the Rhetoric of Dexuality (OBT 2; Philadelphia: Fortress Press 1978).

Trible, P., Texts of Terror. Literary-Feminist Readings of Biblical Narratives (Philadelphia: For¬tress Press 1984).

Via, D.O., The Parables. Their Literary and Existential Dimension (Philadelphia: Fortress Press 1967).

Watson, D.F., „Why We Need Socio-Rhetorical Commentary and What It Might Look Like”, Rhetorical Criticism of the Bible. A Comprehensive Bibliography with Notes on History and Method (red. D.F. Watson – A.J. Hauser) (BibInt 4; Leiden – New York: Brill 1994) 129-157.

Watson, D.F. (red.), Miracle Discourse in the New Testament (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Liter¬ature 2012).

Watson, D.F. – Robbins, V.K., „Dialogue Between Vernon Robbins and the Reviewers”, Journal for the Study of the New Testament 20/70 (1998) 109-115.

Wilde, J.A., „The Social World of Mark’s Gospel: A Word about Method”, Society of Biblical Lit¬erature I978 Seminar Papers (red. J.P. Achtemeier) (Missoula, MT: Scholars Press 1978) 47-70.

Wilder, A.N., The Language of the Gospel. Early Christian Rhetoric (New York: Harper & Row 1964).

Witherington, B., Conflict and Community in Corinth. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on 1 and 2 Corinthians (Grand Rapids MI – Carlisle: Eerdmans; Paternoster Press 1995).

Witherington, B., The Acts of the Apostles. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI – Carlisle, U.K.: Eerdmans; Paternoster Press 1998).

Witherington, B., The Gospel of Mark. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand R apids, M I: Eerdmans 2001).

Witherington, B., 1 and 2 Thessalonians. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2006).

Witherington, B., A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on Titus, 1–2 Timothy and 1–3 John (Letters and Homilies for Hellenized Christians 1; Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic 2006).

Witherington, B., A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on 1–2 Peter (Letters and Homilies for Hel¬lenized Christians 2; Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic 2007).

Witherington, B., Letters and Homilies for Jewish Christians. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on Hebrews, James and Jude (Downers Grove, IL – Nottingham, UK: IVP Academic; Apollos 2007).

Witherington, B., Paul’s Letter to the Philippians. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2011).

Witherington, B. – Hyatt, D., Paul’s Letter to the Romans. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2004).



Kowalski, M. (2017). Retoryka i socjo-retoryka w lekturze tekstów Nowego Testamentu Cz. 2: Socjo-retoryka – projekt holistycznej lektury tekstu. The Biblical Annals, 7(1), 107–147. Pobrano z

Marcin Kowalski
Instytut Nauk Biblijnych KUL


  1. Zgodnie z ustawą o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r., Autor publikacji udziela Wydawcy czasopisma „The Biblical Annals” niewyłącznej i nieodpłatnej licencji na korzystanie z składanego do publikacji Utworu przez czas nieokreślony na nieograniczonym terytorium na następujących polach eksploatacji:
    a) w zakresie utrwalenia Utworu, zwielokrotnienia Utworu dowolną techniką (w tym drukiem oraz w formie zapisu elektronicznego) na wszelkich znanych nośnikach (w tym informatycznych, elektronicznych i poligraficznych) oraz we wszelkich systemach informatycznych (szczególnie typu Internet);
    b) w zakresie wprowadzenia Utworu do pamięci komputera, rozpowszechniania Utworu i egzemplarzy zwielokrotnienia Utworu, wprowadzenia do obrotu Utworu i egzemplarzy zwielokrotnienia Utworu;
    c) w zakresie publicznego wykonania, odtwarzania, wystawiania i wyświetlania Utworu, użyczaniu, najmu i dzierżawy Utworu oraz egzemplarzy zwielokrotnienia Utworu;
    d) w zakresie udostępniania, wprowadzanie do obrotu i rozpowszechniania Utworu i egzemplarzy zwielokrotnienia Utworu za pośrednictwem sieci informatycznych, w szczególności typu Internet, w tym promocji lub reklamy Utworu, czasopisma lub Wydawcy.
  2. Ponadto, Autor nieodpłatnie zezwala Wydawcy na korzystanie i rozporządzanie opracowaniami Utworów.
  3. Wydawca może udzielać sublicencji.
  4. Osoby trzecie z Utworów oraz z innych materiałów zawierających lub powstałych w oparciu o Utwory mogą korzystać zgodnie ze wzorcem licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 (znanej również jako CC-BY).