The Fruits without the Roots? Postmodern Group-Identity in the Light of Biblical Anthropology

Jaap Doedens

Pápa Reformed Theological Seminary , Hungary
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-3871


Abstract

The origins of modern western societies are indubitably rooted in Judeo-Christian values that generated a unique form of civilization over the course of almost two-thousand years. These values have as their core-belief that humans are created in the image of God. This notion deeply influenced views on human identity and on human rights. Since the rise of modernity, these religious roots of the western world-view have eroded gradually as a consequence of secularization. While society increasingly became cut off from its own roots, the fruits of the former world-view were still accepted as desirable. Howev­er, emerging post-modernity appears to be in the process of not only losing the roots, but also rejecting the fruits of Judeo-Christian values. As a consequence, human identity is evermore perceived as consisting of – often conflicting – group-identities. The aim of this study is to discover whether biblical anthropology can shed light on the functions of groups within a given society. Being aware of the fact that the way how ancient Israel dealt with minority groups and how this is reflected within the Hebrew Bible is not auto­matically applicable for present-day societies, we still might be able to glean insights for our present world. In order to attain such, this study first analyzes shortly the post-modern societal situation pertaining to group-identities. Subsequently, the focus will be on how Israel’s self-understanding as “chosen people” is approached critically by some parts within the Old Testament. Following that, the study concentrates on how concrete social and religious minority groups were viewed: the sojourners, the poor, the slaves. Within this approach also the “sons of the prophets” and the Rechabites will be reviewed. The study suggests that the Christian church might have an own alternative narrative within a postmodern world by emphasizing that identity should have a transcendent side, by seeing that the individual is the proper level of identity, and by proclaiming that individuals are called to function with responsibility within communities.

Keywords:

minority groups in the Old Testament, sojourners, slaves, the poor, “sons of the prophets”, Rechabites, biblical anthropology, modernism, postmodernism, group identity

Baum, J.-W. – Cunitz, E. – Reuss, E.W.E. (eds.), Ioannis Calvini Opera Quae Supersunt Omnia (Corpus Reformatorum 30; Braunschweig: Schwetschke 1864) II.

Buttrick, G.A. (ed.), The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible (New York: Abingdon 1962) III–IV.

Calvin, J., The Institutes of the Christian Religion (trans. H. Beveridge) (New York: Pacific Publishing Studio 2011).

Carroll, L., Through the Looking-Glass. And What Alice Found There (Mineola, NY: Dover Publications 1999).

Cohen, S.J.D., “‘Those Who Say They Are Jews and Are Not’: How Do You Know a Jew in Antiquity When You See One?,” Diasporas in Antiquity (eds. S.J.D. Cohen – E.S. Frerichs) (Brown Judaic Studies 288; Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press 1993) 1–46. (Crossref)

Dick, M., “The Mesopotamian ‘Washing of the Mouth’ (mīs pī) or ‘Opening of the Mouth’ (pīt pī) Ritual. (4.32A–C),” The Context of Scripture. IV. Supplements (ed. K.L. Younger) (Leiden: Brill 2016) 133–144.

Doležal, S., “Rethinking a Massacre: What Really Happened in Thessalonica and Milan in 390?,” Eirene 50/1–2 (2014) 89–107.

García Martínez, F. – Tigchelaar, E.J.C. (eds.), The Dead Sea Scrolls. Study Edition (Leiden: Brill 2005) I.

Jenei, P., “Strategies of Stranger Inclusion in the Narrative Traditions of Joshua–Judges: The Cases of Rahab’s Household, the Kenites and the Gibeonites,” Old Testament Essays 32/1 (2019) 127–154. (Crossref)

Jenei, P., “Subjugating and Exploiting the Second-Class Population of the Ancient Israelite State: The Case of Forced Labour ( מַס ) in Light of the Population Economy of Ancient Israel,” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 45/1 (2019) 57–72.

Köhler, L., Der hebräische Mensch. Eine Skizze (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1980).

Pontifical Biblical Commission, What Is Man? A Journey Through Biblical Anthropology (trans. F. O’Fearghail – A. Graffy) (London: Darton, Longman & Todd 2021).

Rogerson, J.W., Anthropology and the Old Testament (Growing Points in Theology; Oxford: Blackwell 1978).

Schulte, H., “The End of the Omride Dynasty: Social-Ethical Observations on the Subject of Power and Violence,” Semeia 66 (1994) 133–148.

Smith, M.J. – Choi, J.Y. (eds.), Minoritized Women Reading Race and Ethnicity. Intersectional Approaches to Constructed Identity and Early Christian Texts (Feminist Studies and Sacred Texts; Lanham, MD: Lexington 2020).

Thom, P., The Logic of the Trinity. Augustine to Ockham (New York: Fordham University Press 2012). (Crossref)

Wolff, H.W., Anthropologie des Alten Testaments (Munich: Kaiser 1973).

Wright, N.T., „The Truth of the Gospel and Christian Living,” M.J. Borg – N.T. Wright, The Meaning of Jesus. Two Visions (New York: HarperCollins 1999) 207–228.

Wright, N.T., Paul and the Faithfulness of God (Christian Origins and the Question of God 4; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2013).

Wright, N.T., “God and Caesar, Then and Now,” The Character of Wisdom. Essays in Honour of Wesley Carr (eds. S. Lowe – M. Percy) (London: Routledge 2016) 157–172.

Download

Published
2022-04-28


Doedens, J. (2022). The Fruits without the Roots? Postmodern Group-Identity in the Light of Biblical Anthropology. The Biblical Annals, 12(2), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.13184

Jaap Doedens  jaapdoedens@gmail.com
Pápa Reformed Theological Seminary https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-3871



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants to the Publisher of the journal „The Biblical Annals” e a non-exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Work submitted for publication, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
    a) record the Work and copy it by means of any technique (including printing and electronic recording) on all known data carriers (including IT, electronic and polygraphic), and in all IT systems (in particular those available online);
    b) enter the Work into computer memory, disseminate the Work and its copies, as well as market the Work and its copies;
    c) publicly perform, replay, display and screen the Work, as well as lend, rent and lease the Work and its copies;
    d) make available, market and disseminate the Work and its copies via IT networks, and in particular via the Internet, including the promotion or advertising of the Work, the journal or the Publisher.
  2. The Author shall further grant his/her consent for the Publisher to use and dispose of derivative works.
  3. The Publisher may sublicense the work.
  4. Third parties may use the articles and other materials containing the Works, or developed on the basis of the Works in line with the model Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also referred to as CC BY 4.0).