What If Hosea Hadn’t Actually Existed …?

The New Historicism in the Contemporary Bible Studies — Prospects and Concerns

Arnold Zawadzki

John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin ,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7827-7881


Abstract

The article presents an extended review of James M. Bos’s book Reconsidering the Date and the Provenance of the Book of Hosea. The Case for the Persian-Period Yehud, against the backdrop of the issue of the new historicism in biblical studies. After a brief overview of the phenomenon of this new historicism (its genesis and historical development), Bos’s approach is discussed from the point of view of its ideological-philosophical context. Then a detailed analysis of the entire structure of Bos’s book is presented, along with a critical assessment of his reasoning. The author of the article argues that the new historicist approach is completely subjective and wrong, as it absolutizes a philosophical principle without admitting the element of faith or any possibility of coincidence or doubt.

 

Keywords:

new historicism, new historicism in biblical studies, Hosea, Bos, Persian period, Liverani

Amit, Y., Hidden Polemics in Biblical Narrative (Leiden: Brill 2000).

Assmann, J., Pamięć kulturowa. Pismo, zapamiętywanie i polityczna tożsamość w cywilizacjach starożytnych (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego 2008).

Blenkinsopp, J., “The Judaean Priesthood During the Neo-Babylonian and Achaemenid Periods: A Hypothetical Reconstruction”, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 69 (1998) 25-43.

Bos, J.M., Reconsidering the Date and the Provenance of the Book of Hosea. The Case for the Persian- Period Yehud (Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 580; London et al.: Bloomsbury 2014).

Cox, J.N. – Reynolds, L.J., “The Historicist Enterprise”, New Historical Literary Study. Essays on Reproducing Texts, Representing History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1993) 3-38.

Danto, A.C., Analytical Philosophy of History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1968).

Davies, Ph.R., The Origins of Biblical Israel (New York – London: T&T Clark 2007).

Eagleton, T., Criticism and Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory (London: New Left Books 1976).

Edelman, D.V., “Did Saulide-Davidic Rivalry Resurface in Early Persian Yehud?”, The Land That I Will Show You: Essays on the History and Archaeology of the Ancient Near East in Honour of J. Maxwell Miller (a cura di J.A. Dearman – M.P. Graham) (JSOTSup 343; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 2011) 69-91.

Edelman, D.V., The Origins of the «Second Temple»: Persian Imperial Policy and the Rebuilding of Jerusalem (London: Equinox 2005).

Fineman, J., “The History of the Anecdote: Fiction and Fiction”, The New Historicism (a cura di H.A. Veeser) (New York – London: Routledge 1989) 49-76.

Finkelstein, I. – Singer-Avitz, L., “Reevaluating Bethel”, Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 125/1 (2009) 33-48.

Gallagher, C., “Marxism and the New Historicism”, The New Historicism (a cura di H.A. Veeser) (New York – London: Routledge 1989) 37-48.

Greenblatt, S., Learning to Curse-Essays in Early Modern Culture (New York: Routledge 1990).

Greenblatt, S., Renaissance Self-Fashioning. From More to Shakespeare (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press 2005).

Greenblatt, S., Shakespearean Negotiations. The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (Berkeley, CA – Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press 1988).

Guy, J.M. – Small, I., Politics and Value in English Studies? A Discipline in Crisis? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993).

Hawthorn, J., Cunning Passages: New Historicism, Cultural Materialism and Marxism in the Contemporary Literary Debate (London: Arnold Press 1996).

Heck, D., “Wokół nowego historycyzmu”, Pamiętnik Literacki 88/2 (1997) 97-111.

Hens-Piazza, G., The New Historicism (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2002).

Koenen, K., Bethel: Geschichte, Kult und Theologie (OBO 192; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2003).

Liverani, M., Oltre la Bibbia, 3a ed. (Roma – Bari: Laterza 2003).

Macherey, P., A Theory of Literary Production (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1978).

Mink, L.O., Historical Understanding (Ithaca, NY – London: Cornell University Press 1987).

Montrose, L., “Renaissance Literary Studies and the Subject of History”, English Literature Renaissance

/1 (1986) 5-12.

Na’aman, N., “The ‘Conquest of Canaan’ in the Book of Joshua and in the History”, From Nomadism to Monarchy: Archaeological and Historical Aspects of Early Israel (a cura di I. Finkelstein – N. Na’aman) (Washington. D.C.: Biblical Archaeology Society 1994) 218-281.

Na’aman, N., “Does Archaeology Really Deserve the Status of a ‘High Court’ in Biblical Historical Research?”, Between Evidence and Ideology: Essays on the History of Ancient Israel Read at the Joint Meeting of the Society for Old Testament and Oud Testamentisch Werkgezelschap, Lincoln, July 2009 (a cura di B. Becking – L.L. Grabbe) (Leiden: Brill 2011) 165-183.

Nissinen, M., Prophetie, Redaktion und Fortschreibung im Hoseabuch: Studien zum Werdegang eines Prophetenbuches im Lichte von Hos 4 und 11 (AOAT 23; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchen 1991).

Nietzsche, F., Sull’utilità e il danno della storia per la vita (Piccola Biblioteca Adelphi 11; Milano: Adelphi 1974).

Pechter, E., “The New Historicism and Its Discontents: Politicizing Renaissance Drama”, Proceedings

of the Modern Language Association 102 (1987) 290-305.

Rothacker, E., “Das Wort ‘Historismus’”, Zeitschrift für deutsche Wortforschung 16 (1960) 3-6.

Spivak, G.Ch., “The New Historicism. Political Commitment and the Postmodern Critic”, The New Historicism (a cura di H.A. Veeser) (New York – London: Routledge 1989) 277-243.

Strauss, B., La guerra di Troia (Roma – Bari: Laterza 2007).

Van Seters, J., “Joshua’s Campaign of Canaan and Near Eastern Historiography”, Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 4/2 (1990) 1-12.

Veeser, H.A. (a cura di), The New Historicism (New York – London: Routledge 1989).

Veeser, H.A. (a cura di), The New Historicism Reader (New York – London: Routledge 1994).

Wayne, D.E., “New Historicism”, Encyclopedia of Literature and Criticism (a cura di M. Colyle et al.) (London: Routledge 1990) 792.

Werner, K., Giambattista Vico als Philosoph und gelehrter Forscher (Vienna: Braumüller 1881).


Published
2020-03-02


Zawadzki, A. (2020). E se Osea non fosse esistito davvero…?. The Biblical Annals, 10(2), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.5897

Arnold Zawadzki  zawadzki.a@icloud.com
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7827-7881



License

  1. Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants to the Publisher of the journal „The Biblical Annals” e a non-exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Work submitted for publication, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
    a) record the Work and copy it by means of any technique (including printing and electronic recording) on all known data carriers (including IT, electronic and polygraphic), and in all IT systems (in particular those available online);
    b) enter the Work into computer memory, disseminate the Work and its copies, as well as market the Work and its copies;
    c) publicly perform, replay, display and screen the Work, as well as lend, rent and lease the Work and its copies;
    d) make available, market and disseminate the Work and its copies via IT networks, and in particular via the Internet, including the promotion or advertising of the Work, the journal or the Publisher.
  2. The Author shall further grant his/her consent for the Publisher to use and dispose of derivative works.
  3. The Publisher may sublicense the work.
  4. Third parties may use the articles and other materials containing the Works, or developed on the basis of the Works in line with the model Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also referred to as CC BY 4.0).