Theology of the Eucharist in Erasmus' and Titelmans' Paraphrase of John 6
Tomasz Karol Mantyk
Nicolaus Copernicus University of Toruń , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-7079
Abstract
This article explores theological differences in biblical paraphrases of Erasmus of Rotterdam and Francis Titelmans. Erasmus’ biblical scholarship included paraphrases of New Testament books; a genre of biblical commentary that he effectively reinvented. His paraphrases were acclaimed by fellow humanists but criticised by many theologians, including Noel Beda. Meanwhile, Beda’s protegee, Francis Titelmans prepared his own paraphrases, borrowing from Erasmus his innovative form, but filling it with conservative content. This article concentrates on their respective paraphrases of John 6. It demonstrates Titelmans’ indebtness to the older humanist in terms of styles and explores theological differences between them. Erasmus departed from the traditional, eucharistic reading of John 6 and emphasised ethical issues. He often described the Lord’s Supper as symbolic and mystical, which entangled him in accusations of sharing eucharistic theology of Swiss reformers. Titelmans, on the other hand, upheld in all aspects traditional, Catholic teaching and read John 6 through a sacramental prism. The analysis of those early 16th century paraphrases sheds light on pre-Tridentine Catholic biblical exegesis and shows methodological developments that came to full fruition after the Council.
Keywords:
biblical humanism, Erasmus of Rotterdam, Francis Titelmans, Eucharist, Gospel of JohnReferences
Amalou, T., – Vanautgaerden, A. (eds.), Le Nouveau Testament d’Érasme (1516): Regards sur l’Europe des humanistes (Turnhout: Brepols 2020).
Bakker, P.J.J.M. (ed.), The College de Montaigu at the University of Paris: Aspects of Its Institutional and Intellectual History (14th –18th Century) (History of Universities 22/2 [Special Issue]; Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).
Bedouelle, G., “Attacks on the Biblical Humanism of Jacques Lefevre d’Etaples,” Biblical Humanism and Scholasticism in the Age of Erasmus (ed. E. Rummel) (Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition 9; Leiden: Brill 2008) 115– 141.
Bentley, J.H., Humanists and Holy Writ: New Testament Scholarship in the Renaissance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1983).
Bloemendal, J., “Bibliography of Works on Erasmus’ Paraphrases,” Erasmus Studies 36/2 (2016) 187–194, https://doi.org/10.1163/18749275-03602008.
Bloemendal, J., “Erasmus’ Paraphrases on the New Testament: Introduction,” Erasmus Studies 36/2 (2016): 105–122, https://doi.org/10.1163/18749275-03602003.
Bloemendal, J., “Erasmus and Biblical Scholarship,” A Companion to Erasmus (ed. E. MacPhail) (Renaissance Society of America Texts and Studies Series 20; Leiden: Brill 2023) 68–89.
Burnett, A.N., “The Reformation in Basel,” A Companion to the Swiss Reformation (eds. A.N. Burnett – E. Campi) (Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition 72; Leiden: Brill 2016) 170–215.
Cambier, A., “Pieter Titelmans, groot-inkwisiteur, deken van Ronse in Vlaanderen,” Annalen van de Geschieden oudheidkundige Kring van Ronse en het Tenement van Inde 33 (1984) 19–28.
Campi, E., “Theological Profile,” A Companion to the Swiss Reformation (eds. A.N. Burnett – E. Campi) (Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition 72; Leiden: Brill 2016) 445–488.
Chomarat, J., Grammaire et rhétorique chez Érasme (Les classiques de l’humanisme. Etudes 10; Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1981 ) I.
Chomarat, J., “Grammar and Rhetoric in the Paraphrases of the Gospels by Erasmus,” Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 1/1 (1981) 30–68.
Christ-von Wedel, C., Erasmus of Rotterdam: Advocate of a New Christianity (Erasmus Studies; Toronto – Buffalo – London: University of Toronto Press 2013).
Cottier, J.-F., “ Les Paraphrases d’Erasme, une oeuvre negligee: Bibliographie,” Moreana 39/2 (2002) 39–42.
Cottier, J.-F., “L’Exhortatio ad stvdivm euangelica Lectionis: Erasme Paraphraste et son lecteur,” Moreana 39/2 (2002) 21–38.
Cottier, J.-F., “La theorie du genre de la paraphrase selon Erasme,” Les paraphrases bibliques aux XVIe et XVIIe sičcles: actes du Colloque de Bordeaux des 22, 23 et 24 septembre 2004 (eds. V. Ferrer – A. Mantero) (Travaux d’Humanisme et Renaissance 415; Geneve: Droz 2006) 45–58.
Cottier, J.-F., “Lucernam accendere in meridie? Du bon usage de la paraphrase biblique selon Erasme,” Infant Milk or Hardy Nourishment? The Bible for Lay People and Theologians in the Early Modern Period (eds. W. Francois – A.A. den Hollander) ( Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 221; Leuven – Paris – Walpole, MA: Peeters 2009) 65–86.
Cottier, J.-F., “Erasmus’s Paraphrases: A ‘New Kind of Commentary’?,” The Unfolding of Words: Commentary in the
Age of Erasmus (ed. J.R. Henderson) (Erasmus Studies; Toronto – Buffalo – London: University of Toronto Press 2012) 27–45.
Cottier, J.-F., “Four Paraphrases and a Gospel or How to Rewrite Without Repeating Yourself,” Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 36/2 (2016) 131–147.
D’Alatri, M., “Francesco Tittelmans o del lavoro manuale,” Santi e santitá nell’Ordine Cappuccino. I. Il Cinque e il Seicento (ed. M. D’Alatri) (Roma: Postulazione General e dei Cappuccini 1980) 7–19.
Dealy, R., The Stoic Origins of Erasmus’ Philosophy of Christ ( Toronto – Buffalo – London: University of Toronto Press 2017).
Faber, R., “Erasmus’ Novum Instrumentum (1516): Reforming the Bible into the Bible of the Reformation,” Renaissance und Bibelhumanismus (eds. J.M.J. Lange van Ravenswaay – H.J. Selderhuis) (Refo500 Academic Studies 65; Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2020) 295–312.
Farge, J.K., “Noel Beda and the Defense of the Tradition,” Biblical Humanism and Scholasticism in the Age of Erasmus (ed. E. Rummel) (Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition 9; Leiden: Brill 2008) 143–164.
Ferrer, V. – Mantero, A. (eds.), Les paraphrases bibliques aux XVIe et XVIIe sičcles: Actes du Colloque de Bordeaux des 22, 23 et 24 septembre 2004 (Travaux d’Humanisme et Renaissance 415; Geneve: Droz 2006).
Garcia Pinilla, I., “Reconsidering the Relationship between the Complutensian Polyglot Bible and Erasmus’ Novum Testamentum,” Basel 1516: Erasmus’ Edition of the New Testament (eds. M. Wallraff et al.) (Spatmittelalter, Humanismus, Reformation 91; Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck 2016) 59–77.
Gerace, A., Biblical Scholarship in Louvain in the “Golden” Sixteenth Century (Refo500 Academic Studies 60; Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2019).
Godet, M., La Congregation de Montaigu (1490–1580) (Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honore Champion 1912).
den Haan, A., “Valla’s False Modesty: The Annotationes Novi Testamenti Compared with the Biblical Scholarship of Giannozzo Manetti (1396–1459) and Aurelio Lippi Brandolini (1454?–1497),” Reformation & Renaissance Review 25/2–3 (2023) 119–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2023.2286544.
Henderson, J.R., “Editor’s Addendum: Translating an Erasmian Definition of Paraphrase,” The Unfolding of Words: Commentary in the Age of Erasmus (ed. J.R. Henderson) (Erasmus Studies; Toronto – Buffalo – London: University of Toronto Press 2012) 47–54.
Henderson, J.R. (ed.), The Unfolding of Words: Commentary in the Age of Erasmus (Erasmus Studies; Toronto – Buffalo – London: University of Toronto Press 2012).
Hoffmann, M., Rhetoric and Theology: The Hermeneutic of Erasmus (Erasmus Studies; Toronto – Buffalo – London: University of Toronto Press 1994).
Hughes, P.E., Lefčvre, Pioneer of Ecclesiastical Renewal in France (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1984). van Poll-van de Lisdonk, M.L., “Erasmus’ Paraphrasis on the Pauline Epistles: Outlines of a Commentary in the Scope of the ASD Edition,” Erasmus Studies 36/2 (2016) 123–130, https://doi.org/10.1163/18749275-03602004
MacCulloch, D., “Mary and Sixteenth-Century Protestants,” Studies in Church History 39 (2004) 191–217.
Mantyk, T.K., “Migracje Słowa Bożego, czyli obrona wartości Wulgaty według Franciszka Titelmansa,” The Biblical Annals 9/3 (2019) 525–546.
Mantyk, T.K., “Translating Romans 5:12 in the Early 16th Century. Franciscus Titelmans’s Polemic against Humanists,” The Biblical Annals 11/2 (2021) 301–326, https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.11297.
Martin, T.J., The Christology of Erasmus: Christ, Humanity, and Peace (Washington , DC: Catholic University of America Press 2024).
Pabel, H.M. – Vessey, M. (eds.), Holy Scripture Speaks: The Production and Reception of Erasmus’ Paraphrases on the New Testament (Erasmus Studies; Toronto – Buffalo – London: University of Toronto Press 2002).
Paquay, A., Frans Tittelmans van Hasselt (Franciscus Tittelmanus Hasselensis, december 1502–12 september 1537): Opzoekingen over zijn leven, zijne werken en zijne familie (Hasselt: Ceysens 1906).
Payne, J.B., Erasmus: His Theology of the Sacraments (Richmond, VA: Knox 1970).
Payne, J.B., “The Significance of Lutheranizing Changes in Erasmus’ Interpretation of Paul’s Letters to the Romans and Galatians in his Annotationes (1527) and Paraphrases (1532),” Histoire de l’exégčse au XVIe sičcle: textes du Colloque International tenu ŕ Genčve en 1976 (eds. O. Fatio – P. Fraenkel) ( Etudes de Philologie et d’Histoire 34; Geneve: Droz 1978) 312–330.
Phillips, J.E., “The Gospel, the Clergy, and the Laity in Erasmus’ Paraphrase on the Gospel of John,” Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 10/1 (1990) 85–100.
Phillips, J.E., “Food and Drink in Erasmus’ Gospel Paraphrases,” Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 14/1 (1994) 24–45.
Phillips, J.E., “On the Road to Emmaus: Erasmus’ Paraphrase of Luke 24:27,” Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook 22/1 (2002) 68–80.
Phillips, J.E., “Sub evangelistae persona: The Speaking Voice in Erasmus’ Paraphrase on Luke,” Holy Scripture Speaks: The Production and Reception of Erasmus’ Paraphrases on the New Testament (eds. H.M. Pabel – M. Vessey) ( Toronto – Buffalo – London: University of Toronto Press 2002) 127–150, https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442675803-010.
Poythress, D., Reformer of Basel: The Life, Thought, and Influence of Johannes Oecolampadius (Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books 2011).
Rabil Jr., A., Erasmus and the New Testament: The Mind of Christian Humanist (San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press 1972).
Rabil Jr., A., “Erasmus’ Paraphrase of the Gospel of John,” Church History 48/2 (1979) 142–155.
Rabil, A., “Erasmus’ Paraphrases of the New Testament,” Essays on the Works of Erasmus (ed. R.L. DeMolen) (New Haven, CT – London: Yale University Press 1978) 145–161.
del Valle Rodriguez, C., “Antonio Nebrija’s Biblical Scholarship,” Biblical Humanism and Scholasticism in the Age of Erasmus (ed. E. Rummel) (Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition 9; Leiden: Brill 2008) 55–72.
Roussel, B., “Exegetical Fictions? Biblical Paraphrases of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries,” Holy Scripture Speaks: The Production and Reception of Erasmus’ Paraphrases on the New Testament (eds. H.M. Pabel – M. Vessey) (Erasmus Studies; Toronto – Buffalo – London: University of Toronto Press 2002) 59–83.
Rummel, E., Erasmus’ Annotations on the New Testament: From Philologist to Theologian ( Toronto – Buffalo – London: University of Toronto Press 1986).
Rummel, E., Erasmus and His Catholic Critics, 2 vols. (Bibliotheca Humanistica et Reformatorica 45; Nieuwkoop: De Graaf 1989).
Rummel, E., “Why Noel Beda Did Not Like Erasmus’ Paraphrases,” Holy Scripture Speaks: The Production and Reception of Erasmus’ Paraphrases on the New Testament (eds. H.M. Pabel – M. Vessey) (Erasmus Studies; Toronto – Buffalo – London University of Toronto Press 2002) 265–278.
Sartori, P., “La controversia neotestamentaria tra Frans Titelmans ed Erasmo da Rotterdam (1527–1530 CA.): Linee di sviluppo e contenuti,” Humanistica Lovaniensia 52 (2003) 77–135.
Sartori, P., “Tracce dell’opera di Jacobus Latomus nel ≪Prologus Apologeticus≫ di Frans Titelmans,” Margarita amicorum. Studi di cultura europea per Agostino Sottili (eds. F. Forner – C.M. Monti – P.G. Schmidt) (Milano: Vita & Pensiero 2005) 1032–1042.
Sartori, P., “‘ sine bibliis coelum caecis aperiunt’: Frans Titelmans e l’eredita spirituale di Jan Standonck,” Universitŕ, umanesimo, Europa. Giornata di studio in ricordo di Agostino Sottili (ed. S. Negruzzo) (Fonti e studi per la storia dell’Universita di Pavia 47; Milano: Cisalpino 2007) 207–267.
Sartori, P., “Frans Titelmans, the Congregation of Montaigu, and Biblical Scholarship,” Biblical Humanism and Scholasticism in the Age of Erasmus (ed. E. Rummel) (Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition 9; Leiden: Brill 2008) 215–223.
Schonau, C., Jacques Lefčvre d’Etaples und die Reformation (Quellen und Forschungen zur Reformationsgeschichte 91; Gutersloh: Gutersloher 2017).
de Troeyer, B., Bio-bibliographia Franciscana Neerlandica saeculi XVI (Nieuwkoop: B. de Graaf 1969) I.
van de Wiele, J., “De inquisitierechtbank van Pieter Titelmans in de zestiende eeuw in Vlaanderen,” Bijdragen en Mededelingen betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden 97/1 (1982) 19–63, https://doi.org/10.18352/bmgn-lchr.2288.
Nicolaus Copernicus University of Toruń https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-7079
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants to the Publisher of the journal „The Biblical Annals” e a non-exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Work submitted for publication, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
a) record the Work and copy it by means of any technique (including printing and electronic recording) on all known data carriers (including IT, electronic and polygraphic), and in all IT systems (in particular those available online);
b) enter the Work into computer memory, disseminate the Work and its copies, as well as market the Work and its copies;
c) publicly perform, replay, display and screen the Work, as well as lend, rent and lease the Work and its copies;
d) make available, market and disseminate the Work and its copies via IT networks, and in particular via the Internet, including the promotion or advertising of the Work, the journal or the Publisher. - The Author shall further grant his/her consent for the Publisher to use and dispose of derivative works.
- The Publisher may sublicense the work.
- Third parties may use the articles and other materials containing the Works, or developed on the basis of the Works in line with the model Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also referred to as CC BY 4.0).
