What Body Will Not Reach the Kingdom of God?

Patristic Exegesis of 1 Cor 15:50

Mariusz Szram

John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin ,


Abstract

The aim of the article is to compare the exegesis of verse 1 Kor 15, 50 in early patristic literature on the example of the writings of three authors: Irenaeus of Lyon – representative of the Asian tradition; Tertullian of Cartage – associated with the North African tradition, similar in many points to Asian; and Origen – originating from the Alexandrian tradition. All these writers used the moral interpretation of the phrase “flesh and blood” as sinful deeds, which should be abandoned to enter the kingdom of heaven. Each of them, however, also allowed the literal explanation of this verse, trying to reconcile it with the truth of faith about the bodily resurrection. Irenaeus emphasized that the body can not be resurrected and reach the kingdom of God with its own strength, but only with the help of the Holy Spirit. Tertullian thought that the body in the earth would resurrect, but it would not be able to enter the kingdom of heaven without accepting features adapted to the new reality. Origen went the farthest, undermining the possibility of returning to earth-shaped bodies. The analysis of early Christian commentary on the Pauline verse proves that patristic exegesis was theologically oriented and depended on the contemporary doctrinal disputes. One may also notice a certain paradox: sometimes in order to justify a particular philosophical and theological stand, a proponent of literalism or moderate allegorisation might attach more importance to the portable meaning of the inspired text than the alleged allegorist, which in turn referred to a far-reaching literal interpretation.

Keywords:

body, resurrection, St. Paul, patristic exegesis, Irenaeus, Tertul¬lian, Origen



Bibliografia

Literatura źródłowa

Ambrosiaster, Commentarius in 1 Epistulam ad Corinthios (ed. H.J. Vogels) (CSEL 81/2, Vindobonae: Tempsky 1968, 3-194).

Ambrosius, Exameron (ed. C. Schenkl) (CSEL 32/1; Vindobonae – Lipsiae: Tempsky & Freytag 1897, 3-261).

Augustinus, De civitate Dei (ed. B. Dombart – A. Kalb) (CCL 47-48, Turnhout: Brepols 1955).

Augustinus, Epistulae (ed. A. Goldbacher), IV (CSEL 57, Vindobonae – Lipsiae: Tempsky & Freytag 1911).

Cyrillus Alexandrinus, Explanatio in Epistulam 1 ad Corinthios (PG 74, 856-916).

Evangelium Philippi (ed. B. Layton), w: Nag Hammadi Codex II, 2-7, I (NHS 20; Leiden: Brill 1989, 142-215).

Ioannes Chrysostomus, In Epistulam 1 ad Corinthios homiliae (PG 61, 9-382).

Irenaeus, Adversus haereses (éd. A. Rousseau – L. Doutreleau – B. Hemmerdinger – Ch. Mercier), I (SCh 263-264, Paris: Cerf 1979); II (SCh 293-294, Paris: Cerf 1982); III (SCh 210-211, Paris: Cerf 1974); IV (SCh 100/1-2, Paris: Cerf 1965); V (SCh 152-153, Paris: Cerf 1969).

Methodius Olympius, De resurrectione (Hrsg. G. Bonwetsch) (GCS 27, Leipzig: Hinrichs 1917, 217-424).

Origenes – Hieronymus, Tractatus sive homiliae in psalmos (ed. G. Morin) (CCL 78, Turnhout: Brepols 1958, 1-447).

Origenes, Commentarii in Iohannem (éd. C. Blanc), I-V (SCh 120, Paris: Cerf 1966); VI, X, (SCh 157, Paris: Cerf 1970); XIII (SCh 222, Paris: Cerf 1975); XIX-XX (SCh 290, Paris: Cerf 1982); XXVIII-XXXII (SCh 385, Paris: Cerf 1992).

Origenes, Contra Celsum (éd. M. Borret), I-II (SCh 132, Paris: Cerf 1967); III-IV (SCh 136, Paris: Cerf 1968); V-VI (SCh 147, Paris: Cerf 1969); VII-VIII (SCh 150, Paris: Cerf 1969); Introduction et index (SCh 227, Paris: Cerf 1976).

Origenes, De principiis (éd. H. Crouzel – M. Simonetti), I-II (SCh 252-253, Paris: Cerf 1978); III-IV (SCh 268-269, Paris: Cerf 1980); Compléments et index (SCh 312, Paris: Cerf 1984).

Origenes, Fragmenta Commentariorum in 1 Epistulam ad Corinthios (ed. C. Jenkins), JTS 9 (1908) 231-247, 353-372, 500-514; 10 (1909) 29-51.

Pelagius, In Epistulam 1 ad Corinthios Expositio, (éd. A. Hamman) (Patrologia Latina Supplementum 1, Paris: Garnier Frères 1958, 1181-1236).

Tertullianus, Adversus Marcionem (ed. A. Kroymann) (CCL 1, Turnhout: Brepols 1954, 441-726).

Tertullianus, De carne Christi (ed. A. Kroymann) (CCL 2, Turnhout: Brepols 1954, 871-917).

Tertullianus, De praescriptione haereticorum (ed. R.F. Refoulé) (CCL 1, Turnhout: Brepols 1954, 185-224).

Tertullianus, De resurrectione carnis (ed. J.G.P. Borleffs) (CCL 2, Turnhout: Brepols 1954, 919-1012).

Theodoretus Cyrensis, Commentarius in Epistulam 1 ad Corinthios (PG 82, 225-376).

Literatura pomocnicza

Alexandre J., Une chair pour la gloire. L’anthropologie réaliste et mystique de Tertullien (Théologie historique 115; Paris: Beauchesne 2001).

Altermath F., Du corps psychique au corps spirituel. Interprétation de 1 Cor. 15, 35-49 par les auteurs chrétiens des quatre premiers siècles (Tübingen: Mohr 1977).

Barrett C. K., A Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians (London: Adam & Black 1968).

Andia Y. de, Homo vivens. Incorruptibilité et divinisation de l’homme selon Irénée de Lyon (Paris: Études augustiniennes 1986).

Jewett R., Paul’s Anthropological Terms. A Study of Their Use in Conflict Settings (Leiden: Brill 1971).

Kovacs J. L., 1 Corinthians Interpreted by Early Christian Commentators (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2005).

Mees M., „Paulus, Origenes und Methodius über die Auferstehung der Toten”, Augustinianum 26 (1986) 103-113.

Mejzner M., 'An£stasij tÁj sarkÒj. Studio sull’escatologia di Metodio di Olimpo (Excerpta ex dissertatione ad Doctoratum in Theologia et Scientiis Patristicis) (Romae: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum 2007).

Mejzner M., L’escatologia di Metodio di Olimpo (Studia Ephemeridis Augustinianum 124; Romae: Insitutum Patristicum Augustinianum 2011).

Orbe A., Teología de San Ireneo. Comentario al Libro V del “Adversus haereses”, I (Biblioteca des Autores Cristianos Maior 25; Madrid – Toledo: Estudio teológico de San Ildefonso 1985).

Osborn E., Irenaeus of Lyons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001).

Pietrella E., „Caro et sanguis regnum Dei possidere non possunt (1 Co XV, 50)”, Aevum 49 (1975) 36-76.

Prigent P., Justin et l’Ancien Testament. L’argumentation scripturaire du traité contre toutes les hérésies comme source principale du Dialogue avec Tryphon et de la pre¬mière apologie (Paris: J. Gabalda 1964).

Prinzivalli E., Magister Ecclesiae. Il dibattito su Origene fra III e IV secolo (Studia Ephemeridis Augustinianum 82; Romae: Insitutum Patristicum Augustinianum 2002).

Rosik M., Pierwszy List do Koryntian. Wstęp, przekład z oryginału, komentarz (Częstochowa: Edycja Świętego Pawła 2009).

Sand A., Der Begriff “Fleisch” in den paulinischen Hauptbriefen (Regensburg: Pustet 1967).

Schauf W., S£rx. Der Begriff “Fleisch” beim Apostel Paulus unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner Erlösungslehre (Münster: Aschendorffsche 1924).

Simonetti M., Między dosłownością a alegorią. Przyczynek do dziejów egzegezy patrystycznej, tłum. T. Skibiński (Kraków: WAM 2000).

Simonetti M., „Teologia alessandrina e teologia asiatica al concilio di Nicea”, Augustinianum 13 (1973) 369-398.

Spicq C., Theological Lexicon of the New Testament, I-III (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson 1994).

Szram M., Ciało zmartwychwstałe w myśli patrystycznej przełomu II i III wieku (Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL 2010).

The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, C. Brown (ed.), I-III (Exeter – Devon – Grand Rapids – Michigan: Zondervan 1975-1978).

Vitores A., Identidad entre el cuerpo muerto y resuscitado en Origenes segun el De resurrectione de Metodio di Olimpo (Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, Analecta 18; Jerusalem: Franciscan Print 1981).


Published
2019-03-16


Szram, M. (2019). Jakie ciało nie osiągnie królestwa Bożego?. The Biblical Annals, 10(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.4042

Mariusz Szram  m.szram@wp.pl
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin



License

  1. Pursuant to the Act on Copyright and Related Rights of February 4, 1994, the Author of the publication grants to the Publisher of the journal „The Biblical Annals” e a non-exclusive and royalty-free license to use the Work submitted for publication, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
    a) record the Work and copy it by means of any technique (including printing and electronic recording) on all known data carriers (including IT, electronic and polygraphic), and in all IT systems (in particular those available online);
    b) enter the Work into computer memory, disseminate the Work and its copies, as well as market the Work and its copies;
    c) publicly perform, replay, display and screen the Work, as well as lend, rent and lease the Work and its copies;
    d) make available, market and disseminate the Work and its copies via IT networks, and in particular via the Internet, including the promotion or advertising of the Work, the journal or the Publisher.
  2. The Author shall further grant his/her consent for the Publisher to use and dispose of derivative works.
  3. The Publisher may sublicense the work.
  4. Third parties may use the articles and other materials containing the Works, or developed on the basis of the Works in line with the model Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also referred to as CC BY 4.0).