PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Peer review
Both commissioned and submitted papers are subject to blind peer review by two independent and external referees and to editorial revisions. One of the referees will represent an academic milieu from outside Poland, non-related to that of the author; the other will be a Polish scholar. In order to facilitate blind peer review, authors are requested to eliminate all references that might identify them.
The editors reserve the right to decide whether a received manuscript will be considered for publication.
ETHOS
Quarterly of the John Paul II Institute at the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
14, Al. Racławickie, 20-950 Lublin; tel. +48/81/4453217;
ethos@kul.pl, www.czasopisma.kul.pl/ethos
REFEREE’S REPORT
Ethos: Quarterly of the John Paul II Institute, KUL No.
Title:
The referee recommends that the paper be published (please tick the relevant box below):
[ ] the article can be published without any substantive amendments
[ ] the article can be published with minor amendments
[ ] the article can be published with major amendments indicated by the reviewer
[ ] the article can be published, but it does not contribute anything new
[ ] the article cannot be published for reasons indicated by the referee
COMMENTS (please attach a separate sheet, if needed)
Signature ...................................................... Date ........................................
Referee: Tel. .......................................
Academic affiliation .............................................. E-mail ...........................
