Purposes and Functions of Public Punishment in Roman Law in the Perspective of Justinian's Codification

Krzysztof Amielańczyk

Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-5417


Abstract

The objectives and functions of the punishment for a public offence (crimen) had already been discussed by M. Tullius Cicero, Seneca the Younger, or Aulus Gellius many centuries before Emperor Justinian. According to their statements, the Romans distinguished in principle all the types of punitive functions known today: deterrence (special and general prevention), reprisal (retaliation), elimination (protection of society against the perpetrator), and even the rehabilitation

(educative) function. The emergence of the imperial judiciary extra ordinem in criminal matters could have been conducive to performance of various functions assigned to various penalties, along with the possibilities offered by the discretionary power of judicial decisions. However, when reading Emperor Justinian’s Constitutio Tanta and the numerous accounts from the Roman jurists included in his codification, contained in Book 48 of the Digest, one may be convinced that the function of paramount importance for the emperor was to deter potential perpetrators by means of severe penalties, including notably the death penalty. The educational function was rather marginal. The primary objective of the imperial criminal policy was the ruthlessly severe punishing for criminal offences (severitas, atrocitas) and the implementation of the postulate of inevitability of criminal responsibility.

Keywords:

functions of the punishment, the Roman penal public law, Justinian’s Codification, imperial criminal policy



Amielańczyk K., Rzymskie prawo karne w reskryptach cesarza Hadriana, Lublin 2006.

Amielańczyk K., Crimina legitima w rzymskim prawie publicznym, Lublin 2013.

Amielańczyk K., In Search for the Origins of the Roman Public Law Offences (Crimina) in the Archaic Period, The Journal of Juristic Papyrology. Suppl. 29. Mater Familias. Scritti romanistici per Maria Zabłocka, ed. Z. Benincasa, J. Urbanik, Warszawa 2016.

Bauman R., Crime and Punishment in Ancient Rome, London 1996.

Biondi B., Il diritto romano cristiano, vol. 3. La famiglia, rapporti patrimoniali, diritto pubblico, Milano 1954.

Casavola F., Cultura e scienza giuridica, in: F. Casavola, Giuristi Adrianei, Napoli 1980.

Costa E., Crimini e pene da Romolo a Giustiniano, Bologna 1921.

De Robertis F.M., Sulla efficacia normativa delle costituzioni imperiali, Annali della Facoltà di Giurisprudenza della Università di Bari 1941, vol. 4, Bari 1942.

De Robertis F.M., La funzione della pena nel diritto romano, in: Studi in onore di S. Solazzi, Napoli 1948.

Dyjakowska M., Uwagi Marka Tuliusza Cycerona o karze śmierci, in: Kara śmierci w starożytnym Rzymie, ed. H. Kowalski, M. Kuryłowicz, Lublin 1996.

Gioffredi C., I principi del diritto penale romano, Torino 1970.

Giuffrè V., La repressione criminale nell’esperienza romana, Napoli 1998.

Harries J., Law and Crime in the Roman World, Cambridge 2007.

Jolowicz H.F., Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law, Cambridge 1952.

Jones A.H.M., The Criminal Courts of the Roman Republic and Principate, Oxford 1972.

Kubiak P., “Damnatio ad bestias” i inne kary wykonywane na arenie w antycznym Rzymie, Łódź 2014.

Kuryłowicz M., Lucjusz Anneusz Seneka o karze śmierci, in: Kara śmierci w starożytnym Rzymie, ed. H. Kowalski, M. Kuryłowicz, Lublin 1996.

Kuryłowicz M., “Libri terribiles”. Z historii rzymskiego prawa karnego, in: W kręgu teorii i praktyki prawa karnego. Księga poświęcona pamięci Profesora Andrzeja Wąska, ed. L. Leszczyński, E. Skrętowicz, Z. Hołda, Lublin 2005.

Kuryłowicz M., De publicis iudiciis. Instytucje justyniańskie o postępowaniach sądowych publicznych, in: Problemy stosowania prawa sądowego. Księga ofiarowana Profesorowi Edwardowi Skrętowiczowi, ed. I. Nowikowski, Lublin 2007.

Kuryłowicz M., Rzymskie ustawodawstwo karne w kodyfikacji justyniańskiej, in: Ius Romanum Schola Sapientiae. Pocta Petrovi Blahovi k 70. narodeninám, ed. P. Mach, M. Nemec, M. Pekarik, Trnawa 2009.

Litewski W., Podstawowe wartości prawa rzymskiego, Kraków 2001.

Litewski W., Rzymski proces karny, Kraków 2003.

Łapicki B., O spadkobiercach ideologii rzymskiej. Okres chrystianizacji cesarstwa rzymskiego, Łódź 1962.

Marotta V., Multa de iure sanxit. Aspetti della politica del diritto di Antonino Pio, Milano

Mommsen T., Römisches Strafrecht, Leipzig 1899 (Graz 1955).

Mossakowski W., Pojęcie crimina extraordinaria według D. 47,11, in: Salus rei publice suprema lex. Ochrona interesów państwa w prawie karnym starożytnej Grecji i Rzymu, ed. H. Kowalski, M. Kuryłowicz, A. Dębiński, Lublin 2007.

Pawłowska A., Sposoby wykonania kary śmierci w relacjach Tacyta i Swetoniusza, Studia Prawnoustrojowe 2007, vol. 7.

Pawłowska-Mucha A., Sposoby wykonania kary śmierci w prawie rzymskim: polityka a fantazja cesarska, in: Prawo karne i polityka w państwie rzymskim, ed. K. Amielańczyk, D. Słapek, A. Dębiński, Lublin 2015.

Pugliese G., Linee generali dell’evoluzione del diritto penale pubblico durante il principato, Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt 1982, vol. 14, no. 2.

Rein W., Das Kriminalrecht der Römer von Romulus bis auf Justinianus, Leipzig 1844 (Aalen 1962).

Robinson O., The Criminal Law of Ancient Rome, Baltimore 1995.

Robinson O., Penal Practice and Penal Policy in Ancient Rome, New York 2007.

Santalucia B., Diritto e processo penale nell’antica Roma, Milano 1989.

Scapini N., Diritto e procedura penale nell’esperienza giuridica romana, Parma 1992.

Tarwacka A., Obrócić prawo w żart. Instytucje prawne w zbiorze dowcipów “Philogelos”, Warszawa 2016.

Warylewski J., Prawo karne. Część ogólna, Warszawa 2005.

Zabłocki J., Rozważania o procesie rzymskim w “Noctes Atticae” Aulusa Gelliusa, Warszawa 1999.

Zabłocki J., Tarwacka A., Publiczne prawo rzymskie, Warszawa 2005.

Zalewski B., Inspiracje filozoficzne i religijne dla zakazu piętnowania twarzy skazańców. Ze studiów nad konstantyńską humanitas, Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne 2017, vol. 69, no. 2.

Żak E., Prawnicy rzymscy o sposobach wykonania kary śmierci w starożytnym Rzymie, in: Kara śmierci w starożytnym Rzymie, ed. H. Kowalski, M. Kuryłowicz, Lublin 1996.

Download

Published
2019-12-31


Amielańczyk, K. (2019). Purposes and Functions of Public Punishment in Roman Law in the Perspective of Justinian’s Codification. Studia Prawnicze KUL, (4), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.10605

Krzysztof Amielańczyk 
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-5417



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.

Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:

a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;

b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;

c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;

d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;

e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.

The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.