GLOSS TO THE RESOLUTION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF 20 SEPTEMBER 2018, I KZP 5/18

Marzena Szabłowska-Juckiewicz

Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1975-1309

Renata Badowiec

Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7912-1363


Abstract

In the commented resolution, the Supreme Court formulated the thesis that the meaning of the term ‘employee’, used in Article 218 § 1a of the Penal Code, should be determined by means of norms and definitions derived from the labor law. An offense under Article 218 § 1a of the Penal Code constitutes an offense only against employees’ rights within the meaning of Article 2 of the Labor Code and in regard to persons employed under specific conditions to the employment relationship, regardless of the termed used by the parties in the contract (Article 22 § 1¹ of the Labor Code). The position of the Supreme Court should be approved. The term ‘employee’ cannot be given a broader meaning than that used within the labor law, as this would authorize an unlawful interpretation to the detriment of the accused, conflicting with the principle of nullum crimen sine lege. The thesis also attempts to convince that a criminal court, when deciding on the commission of an offense under Article 218 § 1a of the Penal Code, made arrangements for the performance of work in the specific conditions to the employment relationship contrary to the term used by the parties in the contract in accordance with the principle of jurisdictional independence expressed in Article 8 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Keywords:

employee, Article 218 § 1a of the Penal Code, determining the existence of an employment relationship, principle of jurisdictional independence of the criminal court

Barczak-Oplustil A., Obowiązywanie zasady nullum crimen sine lege. Wybrane problemy, Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych 2013, t. 17, z. 3.

Florek L., Pisarczyk Ł., Prawo pracy, Warszawa 2019.

Kijowski A., Podstawa i treść stosunku zatrudnienia a ubezpieczenia społeczne, Przegląd Ubezpieczeń Społecznych i Gospodarczych 2001, z. 10.

Kodeks karny. Komentarz, red. A. Grześkowiak, K. Wiak, Warszawa 2018.

Kodeks postępowania karnego, red. A. Sakowicz, Warszawa 2018.

Kodeks pracy. Komentarz, red. L. Florek, Warszawa 2017.

Kodeks pracy. Komentarz, red. K.W. Baran, Warszawa 2016.

Nullum crimen sine lege, red. I. Sepioło, Warszawa 2013.

System prawa pracy, t. 2. Indywidualne prawo pracy. Część ogólna, red. G. Goździewicz, Warszawa 2017.

Świątkowski A.M., Kodeks pracy. Komentarz, Warszawa 2006.

Published
2021-02-18


Szabłowska-Juckiewicz, M., & Badowiec, R. (2021). Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 20 września 2018 r., I KZP 5/18. Studia Prawnicze KUL, (1), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.10641

Marzena Szabłowska-Juckiewicz 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1975-1309
Renata Badowiec  r.badowiec@umk.pl
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7912-1363



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.

Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:

a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;

b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;

c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;

d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;

e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.

The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.