The importance of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in the context of the weakening of EU mechanisms for the protection of the right to asylum
Dorota Ferenc-Kopeć
University of the National Education Comission, Krakow , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6801-2054
Abstract
The present paper analyses the role of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in counteracting the fragmentation of the refugee protection system in Europe, with particular emphasis on cases concerning push-back, detention and lack of access to asylum procedures. In the context of selective implementation of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) and growing political tensions, the Court in Strasbourg serves as the last guarantor of the fundamental rights of foreigners. Based on an analysis of selected judgments, including M.K. and others v. Poland, D.A. and others v. Poland, and H.Q. and others v. Hungary, the paper indicates the growing significance of the normative minimum set by the ECHR. At the same time, it offers a critical reflection on the structural limitations of this institution and the prospective avenues for strengthening its role. The study was conducted using the dogmatic-legal method supplemented by desk research.
Keywords:
European Court of Human Rights, push-back, non-refoulement, refugees, asylum policy, CEASReferences
Allain J., The ius cogens Nature of Non-Refoulement, International Journal of Refugee Law 2001, t. 13, nr 4.
Baranowska G., Pushbacks in Poland: Grounding the Practice in Domestic Law in 2021, Polish Yearbook of International Law 2021, t. 41.
Benoit-Rohmer F., Klebes H., Council of Europe Law – Towards a pan-European Legal Area, Council of Europe, Strasbourg 2005.
Costello C., The Human Rights of Migrants and Refugees in European Law, Oxford 2016.
Goodwin-Gill G.S., The Right to Seek Asylum: Interception at Sea and the Principle of Non-Refoulement, International Journal of Refugee Law 2011, t. 23, nr 3.
Hathaway J.C., The Rights of Refugees under International Law, Cambridge 2021.
Keller H., Sweet A., Assessing the Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, Yale 2013, https://openyls.law.yale.edu/entities/publication/7a882158-6ec5-40a4-bc08-aa0b6b007ab4 [dostęp: 20.06.2025 r.].
Kędzierski K., Procedura pushback w świetle polsko-białoruskiego kryzysu granicznego. Głos w dyskusji, Studia Prawnoustrojowe 2024, nr 66.
Moreno-Lax, V., Accessing Asylum in Europe, Oxford 2017.
Moreno-Lax V., Crisis as (Asylum) Governance: The Evolving Normalisation of Non-access to Protection in the EU, European Papers 2024, t. 9, nr 1.
Moreno-Lax V., Dismantling the Dublin System: M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, European Journal of Migration and Law 2012, nr 1.
Morgese G., La riforma del sistema Dublino: il problema della condivisione delle responsabilità, Diritto pubblico. Rivista fondata da Andrea Orsi Battaglini 2020, nr 1.
Nowicki M.A., Wokół Konwencji Europejskiej, Warszawa 2017.
Peers S., The New EU Asylum Laws: Taking Rights Half-Seriously, Yearbook of European Law 2024, t. 43, DOI: 10.1093/yel/yeae003.
Petrov J., Unpacking the Partnership: Typology of Constitutional Courts’ Roles in Implementation of the European Court of Human Rights’ Case Law, European Constitutional Law Review 2018, t. 14, nr 3.
Polakiewicz J., A Council of Europe Perspective on the European Union: Crucial and Complex Cooperation, Europe and the World: A Law Review 2021, t. 5 (1).
Spijkerboer T.P., The Human Costs of Border Control, European Journal of Migration and Law 2007, nr 9.
Szklanna A., Ochrona prawna cudzoziemca w świetle orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka, Warszawa 2010.
Theilen J.T., Framing Migration in Human Rights: How the Reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights Legitimises Border Regimes, European Journal of Migration and Law 2025, nr 27.
Wierczyńska K., Stosowanie przez polskich funkcjonariuszy tzw. polityki push-back z punktu widzenia postanowień Statutu Rzymskiego Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego, w: Poza prawem. Prawna ocena działań państwa polskiego w reakcji na kryzys humanitarny na granicy polsko-białoruskiej, red. W. Klaus, Warszawa 2022.
Zając D., Odpowiedzialność karna za przestępstwa popełnione w związku ze stosowaniem push-backów, Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych 2022, t. 26, nr 1–2.
Zieliński G., Prawo uchodźców do ochrony międzynarodowej w prawodawstwie Unii Europejskiej, Studia Prawnoustrojowe 2024, nr 66.
University of the National Education Comission, Krakow https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6801-2054
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.
Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;
b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;
c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;
d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;
e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.
The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.
