Description of the object in the public procurement by reference to trademarks, patents, standards, specifications

Beata Zięba

Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II , Poland


Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the legal regulations concerning the description of the subject-matter of the contract by reference to trade marks, patents, standards, specifications and the problems that may arise while applying those regulations in practice. The author states that the subject matter of the contract can not be described by the indication of the trade mark, patent or origin, source or particular process that characterizes the products or services provided by the particular contractor, if this leads to the privilege or elimination of certain contractors or products, justified by the specific nature of the object of the contract and the contracting authority can not describe the object of the contract with sufficiently precise terms, the indication is accompanied by the words "or equivalent." The structuring of the description of the subject of the contract by means of standards, approvals and technical specifications must take into account circumstances related to the award of the relevant contract on the Polish and Community market. The emphasis is on the fact that if the contracting party has the ability to describe the subject of the contract without the need to use own names, then it should do so. If the contracting party chooses to do so by referring to trademarks, patents, standards and specifications, it should be done knowingly( with accurate precision)  and with knowledge of the rules and limits of liability in this regard.

Keywords:

Public procurement law, description of the object of contract, public procurement, public contract awarding procedure, contracting entity, economic operator, judicature, detailed description (specification) of the subject-matter of the contract, equivalence of the description of the object of contract, directive, Polish standards, European standards



Andała–Sępkowska J., Ograniczenia w opisie przedmiotu zamówienia i warunków realizacji przyszłej umowy, LEX nr 277599.

Banasik P., Specyfikacja Istotnych Warunków Zamówienia, Wrocław 2011.

Bliźniuk G., Opis przedmiotu zamówienia, „Zamówienia Publiczne DORADCA” 2014, nr 3, s. 19.

Czajkowski T. (red.), Prawo zamówień publicznych. Komentarz, Warszawa 2007.

Gazecka N., K. Różowicz, Zamówienia publiczne na dostawy i usługi IT. Wybrane zagadnienia praktyczne, Warszawa 2016, LEX nr 278004.

Karwatowicz G., M. Lamch–Rejowska, Zamówienia publiczne w projektach współfinansowanych ze środków unijnych, Wrocław 2011.

Mazurek G., S. Zaręba, Ustawa o zmianie ustawy Prawo zamówień publicznych. Komentarz, Wrocław 2016.

Michałek–Budzicz A., R. Michalski, M. Woźniak, Analiza rynku zamówień publicznych na narzędzia informatyczne w okresie od 1 stycznia do 30 czerwca 2013 r., Poznań 2013.

Nowicki J.E., A. Bazan, Prawo zamówień publicznych. Komentarz, Warszawa 2015.

Pawelec J., Dyrektywa 2014/24/UE w sprawie zamówień publicznych. Komentarz, Warszawa 2015.

Piróg J., Prawo zamówień publicznych. Komentarz, Warszawa 2010.

Stachowiak M., Komentarz do art. 29 ustawy Prawo zamówień publicznych, [w:] W. Dzierżanowski, J. Jerzykowski, M. Stachowiak, Prawo zamówień publicznych. Komentarz, Warszawa 2018, LEX nr 545201.

Ziembiński D., Zasada proporcjonalności, „ZAMAWIAJĄCY. Zamówienia publiczne w praktyce” 2017, nr 22, s.20.

Przykłady naruszeń ustawy Pzp wykrywanych w toku kontroli przeprowadzonej przez Prezesa UZP w zakresie opisu przedmiotu zamówienia, „Informator Urzędu Zamówień Publicznych” 2011, nr 2, s. 9-10


Published
2017-12-31


Zięba, B. (2017). Opis przedmiotu zamówienia publicznego poprzez odniesienie się do znaków towarowych, patentów, norm, specyfikacji. Studia Prawnicze KUL, (4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.303

Beata Zięba  zieba@kul.pl
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II



License

The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.

Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:

a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;

b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;

c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;

d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;

e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.

The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.