The Law of Force or the Force of Law – Reminiscing on the 200th Anniversary of the Congress of Vienna 1815

Piotr Łaski

Uniwersytet Szczeciński , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-3508


Abstract

Analysing power and for her applying by you to raise belongs, that her nucleon - it is using the military force which is ultima ratio of contemporary couples in the defence of their territory and the population - with word of their statehood.

And although in the sphere of the international law we are dealing with the ban on for her applying, in practice a relative capacity has it is that ban, what results not that much from the plot of the Charter o the United Nations, what above all from the practice of states. The one whereas in the individual, collective, preventive situation of the self-defence, in the fight against terrorism or in case of humane intervention as allowing situations for her using is appealing to the military force.

Contemporary states with reference to using force are guided by a rule that where it is about business of the state she is before regulations. And this state of affairs didn't change in two hundred past years which passed from the Congress of Vienna 1815. Of him whereas participants were of the opinion then, which in spite of the expiry of two centuries, didn't change, and coming down to the fact that in world altogether his military and economic power is deciding on the position of the state, and only then participation in alliances of servicemen what results from the fact that legal-international regulations referring to using force don't have a deciding influence on taken action with for her using international relations towards other participants.

Keywords:

aggression, humanitarian intervention, UN Charter, reprisals, individual self-defense, terrorism, the use of armed force



Aleksandrowicz T., Terroryzm międzynarodowy, Warszawa 2008.

Antonowicz L., Podręcznik prawa międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2015.

Barcik J., Akt terrorystyczny i jego sprawa w świetle prawa międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2004.

Barcik J., Srogosz T., Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne, Warszawa 2014.

Bowett D. W., The Use of Force for the Protection of Nationals Abroad (w:) A. Cassese (ed.), The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force, Oxford 1986.

Calpe E., Diccionario Enciclopedico Abreviado, Madrid 1933, t.2.

Contemporary Practice of the United States, „American Journal of International Law” 1999, vol. 93.

Conuiff M. L., Panama and the United States. The Forced Alliance, Athens 1992.

Corn G. S., The War on Terror and the Laws of War, Syracuse University College of Law, Syracuse, New York, Oxford, 2015.

Scheipers S., Unlawful Combatants, Oxford 2015.

Crawford J., Democracy and International Law, „British Yearbook of International Law”, 1993, vol. 44.

J. Pattison, Humanitarian Intervention and the Resposibility to Protect, Oxford 2012.

Crépon P., Religia a wojna, Gdańsk 1994.

Czapliński W., Wyrozumska A., Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Zagadnienia systemowe, Warszawa 2004.

Delbrück J., The Fight Against Global Terrorism: Self-defence or Collective Security as International Police Action? Some Comments on the International Legal Implications of the „War against Terrorism”, „German Yearbook of International Law”, 2001, vol. 44.

Dinstein Y. ¸ War, aggression and sel-defence, Cambridge 2001.

Dinstein Y., The Conduct of Hostilities under the law of International Armed Conflict, Cambridge 2004.

Doswald-Beck L., The Legal Validity of Military Intervention by Invitation on the Government „British Yearbook of International Law” 1985, vol. 56.

Ehrlich L., Interpretacja traktatów, Warszawa 1957.

Frowein J. A., Unilateral Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions – a Threat to Collective Security (w:) V. Gӧtz i in. (red.), Liber amicorum Günther Jaenicke, Berlin-Heidelberg 1998.

Gibney F., Korea’s Quiet Revolution: From Garrison State to Democracy, New York 1992, s. 125.

Gilmore W., The Grenada Intervention, London 1984.

Gray C., From unity to polarization. International law and the use of force against Iraq, European Journal of International Law, 2002, t.12, nr 1.

Green L. C., Rescue at Entebbe Incident, “Israel Yearbook of Human Rights”, 1978, nr 6.

Greenwood C., International Law and the war against terrorism, „International Affairs” 2002, vol. 78, nr 2.

Greenwood C., The Twilight of the Law of Belligerent Reprisals, „Netherland Yearbook of International Law” 1989, nr 20.

Haraszti G., Some Fundamental Problems of the Law of Treaties, Budapest 1973.

Heir A., Humanitarian intervention. An introduction, New York 2010.

International Court of Justice Reports,1980.

International Court of Justice Reports,1986.

International Legal Reports, 1986.

Jacewicz A., Pojęcie siły w Karcie Narodów Zjednoczonych, Warszawa 1977.

Keegan J., History of Warfare, London 1993.

Kowalski M., Prawo do samoobrony jako środek zwalczania terroryzmu międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2013.

Kowalski M., Prawo do samoobrony jako środek zwalczania terroryzmu międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2013.

Kranz J., Użycie siły zbrojnej – nowe fakty i tendencje, „Sprawy Międzynarodowe” 2006, nr 3.

Kranz J., Wyprzedzające użycie siły (w:) Wielka Encyklopedia Prawa, t 4 - Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne, J. Symonides, D. Pyś (red.), Warszawa 2014.

Krisiotis D., The Legality of the 1983 US Missile Strike on Iraq and the Right of Self-Defence in International Law, “International and Comperative Law Quartely”, 1996, nr 45.

Kwiecień R., Zakaz użycia siły (w:) Wielka Encyklopedia Prawa, t 4 - Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne, J. Symonides, D. Pyś (red.), Warszawa 2014.

Longman A. W., Longman Dictionary of English Laguage and Culture, Oxford 1993.

Mc Lain P., Setting the Score with Saddam: Resolution 1441 and Parallel Justifications for the Use Force against Iraq, „Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 2003, vol. 13, nr 1.

Mielnik B. , Hamas i Strefa Gazy v. Izrael i Palestyna (w:) J. Menkes, E. Cała – Wacinkiewicz (red.), Państwo i terytorium w prawie międzynarodowym , Warszawa 2015.

Murphy D., Terrorism and the concept of „armed attack” in Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, Harvard International Law Journal 2002, nr 43.

Nicholls D., From Dessalines to Duvalier: The Race, Colour and National Dependence in Haiti, London 1996.

Noortmann M., Reinisah A., Ryngaert C., Non-State Actors in International Law, Utrecht 2015.

Pokempner D., Terrorism and Human Rights: The Legal Framework (w:) M. Schmitt, G. L. Berutto (red.), Terrorism and International Law , San Remo 2003.

Przyborowska–Klimczak A., Skrzydło–Tefelska E. (oprac.),

Dokumenty europejskie, t. II, Lublin 1999.

Quillet A., Dictionnaire Quillet de la langue francaise, Paris 1959, t. 1.

Schweisfurth T., Operations to Rescue Nationals in Third States Involving the Use of Force in Relation to Protection of Human Rights, „German Yearbook of International Law” vol. 23, 1980.

Sharma S. K., Welsh J.M., The responsibility to Prevent, Oxford 2015.

Shaw M. N., Prawo międzynarodowe, Warszawa 2011.

Shaw M. N., Some Legal Aspects of the Entebbe Incident, „Jewish Law Annual” 1, 1978.

Słowar russkogo jazyka w czetyriech tomach, Akademi Nauk SSR, Moskwa 1961, t. 4.

T. Mc Leoad, Rule of Law in war, Oxford 2014.

Tomuschart Ch., Der 11 September 2001 und seune rechtlichen konsequenzen, Europaische „Grundrechte-Zeitschriff” 2001, nr 28.

Uniwersalny słownik języka polskiego, Warszawa 2003, t. 3.

Zajadło J., Dylematy humanitarnej interwencji, Gdańsk 2005.

Zajadło-Węglarz P., Interwencja humanitarna (w:) J. Symonides, D. Pyć (red.), Wielka Encyklopedia Prawa, t 4 - Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne, Warszawa 2014.


Published
2016-06-26


Łaski, P. (2016). Prawo siły czy siła prawa – reminiscencje w dwusetleciu Kongresu Wiedeńskiego 1815 r. Studia Prawnicze KUL, (2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.5041

Piotr Łaski 
Uniwersytet Szczeciński https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-3508



License

The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.

Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:

a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;

b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;

c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;

d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;

e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.

The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.