Digital borders in the European Union
Abstract
The world is facing a new geoeconomic order in which digital media has changed the rules of the game. Borders are fuzzy and both companies and consumers try to strike a balance between free market access and the restrictions that protected economic interests establish. Based on these parameters, the European Union is trying to restructure the single market by applying global solutions that nevertheless collide with the protection measures demanded by economic operators, blocking the provision of services and the free movement of goods through so-called geoblocking. This practice consists of blocking access to services and/or the offer of products depending on the geographical origin of the user/client, either by redirecting users to local websites or simply by restricting access to their product brochure. The fact that consumer associations and users of digital platforms have considered this blockade as a real attack on the digital single market has led the European Union to seek legislative solutions. That is why the European Commission has promoted Regulation 2018/302, which aims to prevent unjustified geographical blocking and other forms of discrimination based on the nationality, place of residence or place of establishment of clients in the internal market. The justification of these protective measures as well as their location in the global geoeconomic space are studied in this work.
Keywords:
Geo-economics, Internet, Geo-blocking, Geolocation, Electronic CommerceReferences
De Miguel Asensio P.A., Contratos Internacionales sobre Propiedad Industrial, Madrit 2000.
De Miguel Asensio P.A., Derecho privado de Internet, Madrit 2000.
De Miguel Asensio P.A., El nuevo Reglamento de la Unión Europea sobre bloqueo geográfico y otras formas de discriminación, La Ley Unión Europea 2018, no. 59.
Gardeñes Santiago M., La imperatividad internacional del principio comunitario de no discriminación por razón de la nacionalidad, Revista de Instituciones Europeas 1996, vol. 23.
Garrone P., La discrimination indirecte en droit communautaire: vers une théorie générale, Revue Trimestrelle de Drot Européen 1994, no. 3.
Goldsmith J.L., Wu T., Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of A Borderless World, New York 2006.
Hilliard C., Evaluating the Legitimacy of Geo-Location Circumvention in the Context of Technical Protection Measures, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property 2015, vol. 5, no. 2.
Introduction à la Géoéconomie, Ed. P. Lorot, Paris 1999.
López-Tarruella Martínez A., El criterio de las actividades dirigidas como concepto autónomo de Dipr de la Unión Europea para la regulación de las actividades en Internet, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional 2017, vol. 69, no. 2.
López-Tarruella Martínez A., El Reglamento 2018/302 sobre bloqueo geográfico injustificado y su relación con el criterio de las actividades dirigidas, Bitácora Millenium DiPr: Derecho Internacional Privado 2018, no. 7.
Luttwak E., From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics, The National Interest 1990, no. 20.
Marketa T., The Multiplicity of Copyright Laws on the Internet, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 2015, vol. 25, no. 2.
Millán García R., Geolocalización: legislación y consecuencias de su uso, Actualidad Administrativa 2019, no. 4.
Muir J.A., Van Oorschot P.C., Internet Geolocation: Evasion and Counterevasion, ACM Computing Surveys 2009, vol. 42, no. 1.
Ohmae K., El fin del Estado-Nación. El ascenso de las Economías Regionales, Santiago de Chile 1997.
Paredes Pérez J.L., Medidas contra el bloqueo geográfico injustificado: El Reglamento (UE) 2018/302 y su incidencia sobe las normas europeas de Derecho internacional privado, Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales 2018, no. 35.
Sparke M., From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics: Transnational State Effects in the Borderlands, Geopolitics 1998, vol. 3, no. 2.
Svantesson D., Jerker B., Geo-location technologies and other means of placing borders on the ‘borderless’ Internet, John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law 2004, vol. 23, no. 1.
Trimble M., The Future of Cybertravel: Legal. Implications of the Evasion of Geolocation, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 2012, vol. 22, no. 3.
Trimble M., Geoblocking, Technical Standards and the Law, Scholarly Works Paper 2016, no. 947.
Abat Oliba CEU University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5954-5553
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.
Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;
b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;
c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;
d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;
e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.
The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.
