Administrative driving license retention. The problem of dualism in administrative proceedings and offenses in the context of evidence proceedings

Artur Kuś

Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6319-4936


Abstract

The article aims to establish whether it is possible to issue a decision to retain a driver’s license on the sole basis of information (a police report) disclosing an act of exceeding the speed limit by over 50 km/h while driving in a built up area, when in the given case, no parallel court proceedings regarding this offence were initiated on account of a “caution” issued to the driver by a policeman. The above-mentioned situation results in the inability to carry out the evidence proceedings. This is caused by the fact that in an administrative proceeding (taking the Supreme Administrative Court resolution into consideration) such an inquiry is not conducted and a court proceeding based on this offence will not be initiated (due to the “caution” given to the driver). The consequence of this factual and legal state (so-called “legislative omission”) is that a party is deprived of the real right to a fair trial and the possibility of engaging in any kind of evidence proceedings, which cannot be deemed equivalent to constitutional standards and standards stemming from international law.

Keywords:

administrative retention of driving license, evidence proceedings, right to a court, objectivity of administrative proceedings



Błaś A., w: Konstytucje Rzeczypospolitej oraz komentarz do Konstytucji RP z 1997 roku, red. J. Boć, Wrocław 1998.

Bosek L., Zaniechanie prawodawcze jako przedmiot kontroli sądowej (analiza porównawcza), Warszawa 2003.

Grudecki M., Kara nagany i środki oddziaływania społecznego oraz środki oddziaływania wychowawczego w prawie wykroczeń, Prokuratura i Prawo 2018, nr 7–8.

Grzybowski M., Zaniechanie prawodawcze w praktyce polskiego Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, https://www.confeuconstco.org/reports/rep-xiv/report_Poland_po.pdf

Kotowski W., Ustawa o kierujących pojazdami. Komentarz, Warszawa 2012.

Raguszewska M., Sankcja za ujawnione dwukrotne kierowanie w tym samym dniu pojazdem z prędkością przekraczającą dopuszczalną o więcej niż 50 km/h na obszarze zabudowanym, Nowe Zeszyty Samorządowe 2017, nr 2.

Stawecki T., Precedens jako zadanie dla nauk prawnych, w: Precedens w polskim systemie prawa, red. A. Śledzińska-Simon, M. Wyrzykowski, Warszawa 2010.

Wróblewska I., Zasada państwa prawnego w orzecznictwie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego RP, Toruń 2010.

Wróblewski J., Precedens i jednolitość sądowego stosowania prawa, Państwo i Prawo 1971, 10.

Zirk-Sadowski M., Precedens a tzw. decyzja prawotwórcza, Państwo i Prawo 1980, nr 6.


Published
2020-09-30


Kuś, A. (2020). Administracyjne zatrzymanie prawa jazdy. Problem dualizmu postępowań administracyjnego i w sprawie wykroczeń w kontekście postępowania dowodowego. Studia Prawnicze KUL, (3), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.6264

Artur Kuś  artur.kus@ujk.edu.pl
Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6319-4936



License

The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.

Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:

a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;

b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;

c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;

d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;

e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.

The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.