Alternatives of the scale of the project. Gloss on Supreme Administrative Court judgment of 23 January 2019, II OSK 3147/18

Jacek Joachim Krystek

Politechnika Łódzka , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7251-9675


Abstract

The gloss is concerned with the judgment of the Polish Supreme Administrative Court of 23 January 2019, II OSK 3147/18, which states that a change in the wind farm capacity is not an alternative option but a different type of enterprise. The method of inference as applied by the Court was thoroughly analyzed and criticized. The Act on the provision of information on the environment and its protection, public participation in environmental protection, and on environmental impact assessments does not introduce any formal requirements that must be met by the analyzed variants during the environmental impact assessment, except for the alternative to the variant proposed by the applicant.

Keywords:

environmental impact assessment, alternatives, environmental impact assessment report, scale of the project



Gruszecki K., Ustawa o udostępnianiu informacji o środowisku i jego ochronie, udziale społeczeństwa w ochronie środowiska oraz o ocenach oddziaływania na środowisko. Komentarz, Warszawa 2009.

Klimek G., Raport o oddziaływaniu przedsięwzięcia na środowisko w świetle przepisów prawa polskiego, w: Ocena oddziaływania na środowisko w praktyce, red. B. Rakoczy, Warszawa 2017.

Krystek J., Ocena oddziaływania na środowisko. Teoria i praktyka, Warszawa 2020.

Krystek J., Ocena oddziaływania na środowisko, w: Ochrona środowiska dla inżynierów, red. J. Krystek, Warszawa 2018.

Pchałek M., Behnke M., Postępowanie w sprawie oceny oddziaływania na środowisko w prawie polskim i UE, Warszawa 2009.

Podręcznik dobrych praktyk wykonywania opracowań środowiskowych dla dróg krajowych, red. J. Bohatkiewicz, Kraków 2008, http://siskom.waw.pl/nauka/literatura/podrecznik_dobrych_praktyk.pdf [dostęp: 26.04.2020 r.].

Szafranko E., Metody analizy wariantów inwestycji drogowych, Drogownictwo 2014, nr 1.


Published
2021-09-28


Krystek, J. J. (2021). Wariantowanie skalą przedsięwzięcia. Glosa do wyroku Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 23 stycznia 2019 r. , II OSK 3147/18. Studia Prawnicze KUL, (3), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.9701

Jacek Joachim Krystek  jacek.krystek@p.lodz.pl
Politechnika Łódzka https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7251-9675



License

The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.

Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:

a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;

b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;

c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;

d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;

e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.

The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.