Gloss on Supreme Administrative Court judgment of 31 August 2017, II OSK 3025/15, LEX 2390501
Sławomir Zwolak
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski , PolandAbstract
The gloss is concerns the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 31 August 2017 (II OSK 3025/15), which states that when determining the circle of parties to administrative proceedings in matters related to the issue of a building permit, any influence on neighboring properties should be taken into consideration generally applicable laws may mean limiting the owners in the exercise of their rights. In the light of the Supreme Administrative Court's judgment, the parties to the proceedings should be preceded by an analysis of many provisions, including the provisions of the Civil Code, if the property is exposed to immissions.
Keywords:
construction law, area of influence of a object building, party to the proceedingsReferences
Borkowski J., Glosa do wyroku WSA z dnia 19 października 2004 r., II SA/Lu 161/04, „Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich” 2006, nr 2, s. 14-21.
Chróścielewski W., Strony i uczestnicy postępowania sądowoadministracyjnego, „Państwo i Prawo” 2004, nr 9, s. 32-45.
Dziwiński R., Komentarz do zmian w prawie budowlanym, „Gazeta Prawna” 2003, nr 95, s. 3.
Dziwiński R., P. Ziemski, Prawo budowlane. Komentarz, Warszawa 2006.
Kostka Z., Prawo budowlane. Komentarz, Gdańsk 2005.
Laskowska M., Ochrona interesów sąsiadów w procesie budowlanym po nowelizacji, „Samorząd Terytorialny” 2004, nr 5, s. 37-49.
Moll T., Przymiot strony w postępowaniu w sprawie pozwolenia na budowę, „Przegląd Prawa Publicznego” 2014, nr 9, s. 66-75.
Niewiadomski Z. [w:] Z. Niewiadomski (red.), Prawo budowlane. Komentarz, Warszawa 2006, s. 3-166.
Plucińska-Filipowicz A., A. Kosicki, Strony i sąsiedztwo w sprawach budowlanych, [w:] A. Plucińska-Filipowicz, M. Wierzbowski (red.), Proces inwestycji budowlanych, Warszawa 2015, s. 48-67.
Radziszewski E., Prawo budowlane. Przepisy i komentarz, Warszawa 2005.
Rudnicki S., Własność nieruchomości, Warszawa 2008.
Serafin S., Prawo budowlane. Komentarz, Warszawa 2006.
Siegień J., Prawo budowlane. Komentarz, Warszawa 2003.
Sypniewski D., Deregulacja procesu inwestycyjno-budowlanego. Ograniczenie reglamentacji robót budowlanych, „Przegląd Prawa Publicznego” 2013, nr 2, s. 67-79.
Szwajdler W., Glosa do wyroku NSA z dnia 28 marca 2007 r., II OSK 208/06, „Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich” 2008, nr 3, s. 29-37.
License
The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.
Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;
b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;
c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;
d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;
e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.
The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.
