Maintaining a sustainable workplace: Internal Corporate Social Responsibility practices in Dialog Semiconductor during the COVID-19 pandemic
Agnieszka Marek
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II , Polskahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-1194
Mariia Kozak
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6283-1198
Abstrakt
Pandemia COVID-19 pokazała, że wiele firm musiało zmierzyć się z trudnościami, aby mimo kryzysu, działać efektywnie a jednocześnie zminimalizować ryzyko redukcji kadry pracowniczej. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest ukazanie wpływu działań z zakresu wewnętrznego CSR podejmowanych przez Dialog Semiconductor, aby zapewnić zrównoważone miejsca pracy w czasie pandemii. Na bazie teoretycznych rozważań i analizy literatury prezentujemy studium przypadku zawierające szereg aktywności badanej organizacji oraz informację zwrotną od pracowników uzyskaną poprzez przeprowadzenie badań ankietowych. Wyniki przeprowadzonych badań wykazały, że przedsiębiorstwo z sukcesem utrzymało zrównoważone miejsca pracy w czasie pandemii stosując zalecenia i rekomendacje odpowiednich władz oraz dbając o swoich pracowników poprzez inicjatywy z zakresu wewnętrznej odpowiedzialności biznesu.
Słowa kluczowe:
Wewnętrzny CSR, zrównoważone miejsce pracy, COVID-19Bibliografia
Abriata, B., & Delautre, G. (2020). What drives CSR? An empirical analysis on the labour dimensions of CSR. ILO Working Paper, 7. Geneva: ILO.
Anitha, K., & Shanthi, V. (2020). Employee Well-Being – A Path to Redefine Workplace. Sumedha Journal of Management, 9(1), 79-90. doi: 10.46454/sumedha/9.1.2020.6 (Crossref)
Aon. (2019). Retrieved from https://rewards.aon.com/enus/insights/infographics/2019/technology/radford-turnover-hiring-sentiment-by-commercial-stage-at-u-s-based-life-sciences-companies-as-of (17.09.2020).
Di Fabio, A., & Rosen, M.A. (2018). Opening the Black Box of Psychological Processes in the Science of Sustainable Development: A New Frontier. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(4), 47. doi: 10.20897/ejosdr/3933 (Crossref)
Dialog Semiconductor. (2015). Sustainability report 2015. Retrieved from https://www.dialog-semiconductor.com/sites/default/files/24371_dialog_sustainability_2015_int.pdf (10.01.2020).
Dialog Semiconductor. (2016). Always responsible. Sustainability report 2016. Retrieved from https://www.dialog-semiconductor.com/sites/default/files/dialog_sr_nav.pdf (29.12.2019).
Dialog Semiconductor. (2017). Focus on a sustainable business. Sustainability report 2017. Retrieved from https://www.dialog-semiconductor.com/sites/default/files/dialog_sustainabilityreport_2017_interactive1.pdf (29.12.2019).
Dialog Semiconductor. (2018). Powering the smart connected future. Sustainability report 2018. Retrieved from https://www.dialog-semiconductor.com/sites/default/files/sr_2018.pdf (10.01.2020).
Dialog Semiconductor. (2019). Building a power-efficient connected world. Annual report and accounts 2019. Retrieved from https://www.dialog-semiconductor.com/sites/default/files/gb0059822006-ja-2019-eq-e-00_0.pdf (14.01.2020).
Dialog Semiconductor. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.dialog-semiconductor.com/ (14.01.2020).
European Commision. (2001). Green Paper “Promoting a European framework for CSR”. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2001/EN/1-2001-366-EN-1-0.Pdf (18.03.2020).
Freeman, R.E., & Reed, D.L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. doi: 10.2307/41165018 (Crossref)
Gouldey B.K., Davis, M., Thies, C.F., Yavus, M. (2016). Stakeholder Theory and the Market Value Rule. Financial Decisions, 28(1), 1–20.
Greene, C., Crumbleholme, L., & Myerson, J. (2014). Sustainable cultures. Facilities, 32(7/8), 438–454. doi: 10.1108/f-03-2013-0020 (Crossref)
Guest, D. E., & Conway, N. (2004). Employee well-being and the psychological contract: a report for the CIPD. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
Hameed, I., Riaz, Z., Arain, G.A., & Farooq, O. (2016). How Do Internal and External CSR Affect Employees’ Organizational Identification? A Perspective from the Group Engagement Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00788 (Crossref)
Harrison, A., Wheeler, P., & Whitehead, C. (2004). The distributed workplace: sustainable work environments. London-New York: Spon Press. (Crossref)
Haski-Leventhal, D. (2018). Strategic corporate social responsibility: tools & theories for responsible management. London: SAGE Publications.
Haski-Leventhal, D., Roza, L., & Brammer, S. (2020). Engagement of Employees in Corporate Social Responsibility. London: SAGE Publications.
Hawn, O., & Ioannou, I. (2016). Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2569–2588. doi: 10.1002/smj.2464 (Crossref)
Jamali, D., Samara, G., Zollo, L., & Ciappei, C. (2019). Is internal CSR really less impactful in individualist and masculine Cultures? A multilevel approach. Management Decision, 58(2), 362–375. doi: 10.1108/md-11-2018-1260 (Crossref)
Jastrzębska, E. (2015). Środowisko przyrodnicze jako niemy interesariusz społecznie odpowiedzialnego przedsiębiorstwa. Dobre praktyki biznesu w Polsce. Logistyka Odzysku, 2(15), 49-51.
Khusanova, R., Choi, S. B., & Kang, S.-W. (2019). Sustainable Workplace: The Moderating Role of Office Design on the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in Uzbekistan. Sustainability, 11(24), 7024, 1-20. doi: 10.3390/su11247024 (Crossref)
Leach, D.J., Wall, T.D., & Jackson, P.R. (2003). The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: An empirical test involving operators of complex technology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(1), 27–52. doi: 10.1348/096317903321208871 (Crossref)
Liu, H., & Luo, Jin-hui. (2019). Does a religious affiliation make the CEO more likely to use internal CSRs? Evidence from Chinese privately owned firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(9), 1–33. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2019.1602551 (Crossref)
Marek, A. (2009). Work life balance and social capital – empirical research analyses. Conception of Work Life Balance and Personal Development Policy (p. 31-38). Łódź: Technical Univeristy of Lodz.
Marek, A. (2016). Employee Subjectivity as a Key Value in Management. Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym, 19(4), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.19.4.09 (Crossref)
Mitchel, D. (2018). 50 Top Tools for Employee Wellbeing: A Complete Toolkit for Developing Happy, Healthy, Productive and Engaged Employees [s. l.]: Kogan Page Publishers.
Mory, L., Wirtz, B. W., & Göttel, V. (2016). Factors of internal corporate social responsibility and the effect on organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(13), 1393–1425. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1072103 (Crossref)
Moss, A. (2010). Sustainable Workplace Design. International Specialised Skills Institute, Retrieved from https://www.issinstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ISS-FEL-REPORT-A-MOSS-low-res.pdf (27.04.2021).
Nasution, N., & Ali, M. (2020). The Importance Of Work Life Balance To Improve Work Satisfaction. Jambura Science of Management, 2(2), 57–65. doi: 10.37479/jsm.v2i2.5410 (Crossref)
Opatha, H. H. D. P. J. (2020). COVID-19 in Sri Lanka and Seven HRM Related Recommendations against COVID-19. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 7(2), 152–157. doi: 10.20448/journal.500.2020.72.152.157 (Crossref)
Paillé, P., Amara, N., & Halilem, N. (2018). Greening the workplace through social sustainability among co-workers. Journal of Business Research, 89, 305–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.044 (Crossref)
Papasolomou, I. (2017). The Practice of Internal Corporate Social Responsibility in SMEs in Cyprus. In: S. Idowu, S. Vertigans, A. Schiopoiu Burlea (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-52839-7_5 (Crossref)
Saifulina, N., & Carballo-Penela, A. (2016). Promoting Sustainable Development at an Organizational Level: An Analysis of the Drivers of Workplace Environmentally Friendly Behaviour of Employees. Sustainable Development, 25(4), 299–310. doi: 10.1002/sd.1654 (Crossref)
Samul, J. (2019). Spiritual Leadership: Meaning in the Sustainable Workplace. Sustainability, 12(1), 267. doi: 10.3390/su12010267 (Crossref)
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2003). Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1116581/000111658103000005/dlg20f02.htm, (27.04.2021).
Sznajder, M. (2013). Korzyści z wdrożenia koncepcji społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu (z uwzględnieniem koncepcji interesariuszy). Economics and Mangement, 5(2), 194–211.
Wu, P.-J., Wu, T.-J., & Yuan, K.-S. (2019). “Green” Information Promotes Employees’ Voluntary Green Behavior via Work Values and Perceived Accountability. Sustainability, 11(22), 6335. doi: 10.3390/su11226335 (Crossref)
Yu, M., Vaagaasar, A. L., Müller, R., Wang, L., & Zhu, F. (2018). Empowerment: The key to horizontal leadership in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(7), 992–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.04.003 (Crossref)
Yuriev, A., & Sierra‐Barón, W. (2020). Exploring sustainability cross‐culturally: Employees’ beliefs on green behaviors. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1199–1207. doi: 10.1002/sd.2069 (Crossref)
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-1194
