Functions of the justification of a Voivodeship Administrative Court judgment – commentary to the Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 25 June 2021, II GSK 1273/18
Andrzej Krasuski
Jan Dlugosz University in Częstochowa , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7724-3751
Abstract
The purpose of the comment to the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 25 June 2021, II GSK 1273/18, is to present a legal reflection on the manner of interpreting Article 141 (4) of the Law on Proceedings before Administrative Courts, in the light of the formal-dogmatic method and from the perspective of the function performed by the justification of administrative court judgment. In the judgment commented upon, the Supreme Administrative Court recognised an objection against a cassation decision based on a violation of Article 141 (4) of the Law on Proceedings before Administrative Courts, to the extent that it could have a significant impact on the outcome of the case, as independent cassation grounds leading to the admission of appeals in cassation. Objections were brought against a cassation judgment, which dealt with appeals against decisions to refuse to cancel the tender for frequencies in the 1800 MHz band, which were of significant importance for the situation of competition in the market for telecommunications service provision in mobile networks. The dogmatic analysis also concerns the assessment of the application of the law by the court of first instance, including Article 141 (4) of the Law on Proceedings before Administrative Courts, in the context of the theses contained in the judgment commented upon. The analysis presented led to the formulation of remarks on these theses in the context of the interpretation of Article 141 (4) of the said Act and taking into account the fact that the court of first instance is bound by this interpretation pursuant to Article 190 of the Law on Proceedings before Administrative Courts.
Keywords:
justification, judgment, frequencies, President of the Office of Electronic Communications, dismissal of appeal, stability of persuasive authority of court decisions, cassation reviewReferences
Adamiak B., Postępowanie przed wojewódzkim sądem administracyjnym, w: B. Adamiak, J. Borkowski, Postępowanie administracyjne i sądowoadministracyjne, Warszawa 2021.
Adamiak B., Wyroki wojewódzkiego sądu administracyjnego, w: B. Adamiak, J. Borkowski, Metodyka pracy sędziego w sprawach administracyjnych, Warszawa 2020.
Borkowski M., Zaskarżenie uzasadnienia wyroku w skardze kasacyjnej, Przegląd Podatkowy 2010, nr 10.
Dauter B., Metodyka pracy sędziego sądu administracyjnego, Warszawa 2018.
Demendecki T., Komentarz do Art. 45, w: Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2-4-1997 (Dz. U. Nr 78, poz. 483), oprac. red. na podstawie: System postępowania cywilnego, t. 5. Środki zaskarżenia, red. A. Góra-Błaszczykowska, Warszawa 2023 [wyd. el.
Legalis].
Hauser R., Celińska-Grzegorczyk K., Kompetencje sądów administracyjnych, w: System Prawa Administracyjnego, t. 10. Sądowa kontrola administracji publicznej, red. R. Hauser, Z. K. Niewiadomski, A. Wróbel, Warszawa 2016.
Kabat A., Komentarz do art. 141, w: B. Dauter, M. Niezgódka-Medek, A. Kabat, Prawo o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi. Komentarz, Warszawa 2021 [wyd. el. LEX].
Kmieciak Z., Glosa do uchwały NSA z dnia 11 grudnia 2006 r., I FPS 3/06, OSP 2007, z. 6, poz. 77.
Knysiak-Molczyk H., Skarga i skarga kasacyjna w postępowaniu administracyjnym, Warszawa 2021.
Kowalski M., Rola i pozycja sędziego sądu administracyjnego, w: Metodyka pracy w sądach administracyjnych, red. J. Drachal, R. Hauser, Warszawa 2018.
Łętowska E., Paprocka A., Rzucidło-Grochowska I., Podstawy uzasadniania w prawie konstytucyjnym i międzynarodowym, w: Uzasadnienia decyzji stosowania prawa, red. I. Rzucidło-Grochowska, M. Grochowski, Warszawa 2015.
Stefański R.A., Zabłocki S., Komentarz do Art. 418a, w: Kodeks postępowania karnego, t. 3. Komentarz do art. 297–424, red. R. A. Stefański, S. Zabłocki, Warszawa 2021 [wyd. el. LEX].
Woś T., Orzeczenia sądowe, w: Postępowanie sądowoadministracyjne, red. T. Woś, Warszawa 2017.
Wróblewski J., Zagadnienia metodologiczne prawoznawstwa. Materiały z sesji naukowej, Łódź 27–28 marca 1980 r., Wrocław 1982.
Zawłocki R., Gałęski M., Leżak K.J., Uzasadnienia wyroków sądu karnego na urzędowych formularzach. Komentarz. Wzory. Orzecznictwo, Warszawa 2021.
Jan Dlugosz University in Częstochowa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7724-3751
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.
Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;
b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;
c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;
d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;
e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.
The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.
