The child as a witness - different countries, different regulations

Ewelina Bachera

University of Silesia in Katowice , Poland

Hanna Chmielewska

University of Silesia in Katowice , Poland


Abstract

All countries need to ensure that their laws are regulated in a way that promotes the interests of the child, because the welfare of the child must always take priority. There is no doubts that being a witness can be stressful – some children can find it stressful. The aim of this article is  to present the regulations in different countries: Poland, Japan, Malaysia, RSA, Kenya, New Zealand, Jamaica, Tuvalu, United States of America. What is important, legislators should look at this issue in a sensitive and proper manner.

Keywords:

: best interest of the child, testimony, regulations in different countries

Abiad N., Mansoor F. Z., Criminal Law and the Rights of the Child in Muslim States: A Comparative and Analytical Perspective, London 2010.

Atkins B., New Zealand: the emergence of cultural diversity, [w:] E.E. Sutherland (red.), The Future of Child and Family Law: International Predictions, Cambridge 2012.

Angel W.D., The International Law of Youth Rights: Source Documents and Commentary, Dordrecht 1995.

M. Balcerzak, Prawa człowieka, [w:] M. Balcerzak, S. Sykuna (red.), Leksykon ochrony praw człowieka; 100 podstawowych pojęć, Warszawa 2010.

Boratyńska K. T., Art. 171. Tryb przesłuchiwania, prawo zadawania pytań, [w:] K. T. Boratyńska, A. Górski, A. Sakowicz, A. Ważny, Kodeks Postępowania Karnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2014.

Detrick S., A Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Cambridge 1999.

DuPre D’M., Sites P.J., Child Abuse Investigation Field Guide, Waltham 2015.

Freeman M., Prawa człowieka, Sic!, Warszawa 2007.

Goss M., Ławecki J., Dowód z zeznań małoletniego w świetle nowelizacji art. 185a i 185b KPK, [w:] P. Czarnecki, M. Czerwińska (red.), Katalog dowodów w postępowaniu karnym, Warszawa 2015.

Grzegorczyk T., Kodeks postępowania karnego. Tom I. Komentarz do art. 1-467, Warszawa 2014.

Hill J.R., Prosecuting Child Sexual Abuse Offenders: A Case Study of Victim, Family, Offender, Incident, and Evidentiary Characteristics, ProQuest, Ann Arbor 2008.

Kantonowicz E., Ochrona Praw Dziecka, Warszawa 1996.

Keller-Hamela M., Standardy wyposażenia i korzystania z przyjaznych pokoi przesłuchań dzieci, [w:] M. Sajkowska (red.), Przyjazne przesłuchanie dziecka, Warszawa 2007.

Kiage P., Essentials of Criminal Procedure in Kenya, Nairobi 2013.

Łącki P., Offrieda Höffego koncepcja praw człowieka, Poznań 2008.

Łopatka A., Dziecko - jego prawa człowieka, Warszawa- Poznań 2000.

Przyborowska-Klimczak A., Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Wybór dokumentów, Lublin 2006.

Sitarz O., Ochrona praw dziecka w polski prawie karnym na tle postanowień Konwencji o prawach dziecka, Katowice 2004.

Todres J., Analyzing the Opposition to U.S. Ratification of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, [w:] J. Todres, M.E. Wojcik, C. Revaz, The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: An Analysis of Treaty Provisions and Implications of U.S. Ratification, New York 2006.

Wiśniewski K., Geneza Konwencji o Prawach Dziecka i stosunek jej norm do innych aktów prawa międzynarodowego, [w:] T. Smyczyński (red.), Konwencja o prawach dziecka; analiza i wykładnia, Poznań 1999.

Wójcik D., Rozwój psychiczny dzieci i młodzieży a prawa gwarantowane przez Konwencję o Prawach dziecka, [w:] T. Smyczyński (red.), Konwencja o prawach dziecka; analiza i wykładnia, Poznań 1999.


Published
2016-03-06


Bachera, E., & Chmielewska, H. (2016). Dziecko zeznaje – różne kraje, różne ujęcia. Studia Prawnicze KUL, (1), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.4930

Ewelina Bachera 
University of Silesia in Katowice
Hanna Chmielewska 
University of Silesia in Katowice



License

The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.

Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:

a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;

b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;

c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;

d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;

e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.

The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.