A partially critical commentary on judgement of the Supreme Court – Civil Chamber of 25 September 2019, III CSK 217/17

Sabina Ewa Pochopień

Uniwersytet Wrocławski , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5505-6077


Abstract

The commented judgement concerns the burden of proof in the civil procedure against a former employee accused of revealing a business secret. In Supreme Court, opinion employee should prove that in his business activity does not make use of former employer business secrets. This opinion should not be accepted. On the other hand, the court’s opinion concerning the relation between the prohibition on competition and duty of respecting business secret, as well as the scope of application to the employee’s time limitation regarding confidentiality, which was enforced before the 4th of September 2018, should be approved.

Keywords:

burden of proof, business secret, act of unfair competition, former employee



Adrych-Brzezińska I., Ciężar dowodu w prawie i procesie cywilnym, Warszawa 2015.

Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, red. E. Gniewek, P. Machnikowski, 2019 [baza danych Legalis].

Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, t. 1: Część ogólna, red. A. Kidyba, 2012 [baza danych LEX].

Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, t. 2: Komentarz. Art. 205 (1)-424 (12) red. A. Marciniak, 2019 [baza danych Legalis].

Kuczyński T., Nieuczciwa konkurencja jako kategoria prawa pracy. Przegląd Sądowy 1994, nr 4.

Michalak A., Ochrona tajemnicy przedsiębiorstwa. Zagadnienia cywilnoprawne, Kraków 2006.

Pasqualone D., Intellectual Property: Globespan, Inc v. O’Neil, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2002, nr 1.

Piasecki K., System dowodów i postępowanie dowodowe w sprawach cywilnych, 2012 [baza danych LEX].

Prawo pracy. Zarys wykładu, red. H. Szurgacz, Z. Kubot, T. Kuczyński, A. Tomanek, Warszawa 2016.

Tyc A., Ciężar dowodu – wokół definicji oraz dopuszczalności umownej regulacji, Zeszyt Studencki Kół Naukowych Wydziału Prawa i Administracji UAM 2012, nr 2.

Ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji. Komentarz, red. M. Sieradzka, M. Zdyb, 2016 [baza danych LEX].

Ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji. Komentarz, red. J. Szwaja, 2019 [baza danych Legalis].


Published
2021-07-12


Pochopień, S. E. (2021). Glosa częściowo krytyczna do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego – Izby Cywilnej z dnia 25 września 2019 r., III CSK 217/17. Studia Prawnicze KUL, (2), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.31743/sp.6085

Sabina Ewa Pochopień  sabina.pochopien@uwr.edu.pl
Uniwersytet Wrocławski https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5505-6077



License

The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.

Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:

a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;

b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;

c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;

d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;

e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.

The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.