The Portrait of Isaac in Genesis 27: Between Synchronic and Diachronic Readings of Patriarch’s Character

Anna Rozonoer

Hellenic College, Boston, MA , United States


Modern critical reception characterizes patriarch Isaac as a particular character type: the schle­miel. This article provides a tour through the cumulative evidence for this comedic read, focusing on Genesis 27, the blessing of Jacob. It provides a revised narratological and literary context, arguing that Isaac’s fivefold questioning demonstrates not confusion, but awareness: he knows exactly which son is in front of him. The paper presents an alternative narratological and literary context for Isaac, framing his questions in terms of the editing process: a synchronic reading of Isaac’s acumen is corroborated by evidence from diachronic reading. The redaction history of the Isaac material in chapter 26 yields a number of points suggesting the dependence of the Abraham material on the Isaac narrative. A num­ber of features indicate a stronger, less subordinate Isaac figure based on the earlier tradition revealed by a complex transmission history than the image arising from the mainstream synchronic reading of chapter 27 seems to depict.


biblical interpretation, patriarchal narratives, history of reception, Isaac

Aaron, D.H., Genesis Ideology. Essays on the Uses and Meanings of Stories (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books 2017).

Anderson, J.E., Jacob and the Divine Trickster. A Theology of Deception and YHWH’s Fidelity to the Ancestral Promise in the Jacob Cycle (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns 2011). DOI:

Bledstein, A., “Binder, Trickster, Heel, and Hairy-Man: Rereading Genesis 27 as a Trickster Tale Told by a Woman,” A Feminist Companion to Genesis (ed. A. Brenner; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1993) II, 282–295.

Boase, E., “Life in the Shadows: The Role and Function of Isaac in Genesis: Synchronic and Diachronic Readings,” Vetus Testamentum 51/3 (2001) 312–335. DOI: DOI:

Danta, C., “Sarah’s Laughter: Kafka’s Abraham,” Modernism/Modernity 15/2 (2008) 343–359. DOI: DOI:

Hoover, N., “Who are You?” Reading and Judging Character in Genesis 26:34–28:9 (Master’s thesis; Seattle Pacific Seminary; Seattle, WA 2015).

Jackson, M., Comedy and Feminist Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible. A Subversive Collaboration (Oxford Theological Monographs; Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012). DOI:

Kaminsky, J.S., “Humor and the Theology of Hope: Isaac as a Humorous Figure,” Interpretation 54/4 (2000) 363–375. DOI: DOI:

Kovacs, G. – Marshall, C.W. (eds.), Son of Classics and Comics (Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press 2015).

McCarthy, D.J., “Three Covenants in Genesis,” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 26/2 (1964) 179–189.

O’Neill, B., “A Formal System for Understanding Lies and Deceit,” (revision of a paper given at the Jerusalem Conference on Biblical Economics, Hebrew University, 2000 [2003]).

Schwartz, S., “Brothers of Choice, Chosen Brothers; Rama/Bharata; Jacob/Esau,” Literature and Theology 6/1 (1992) 11–22. DOI: DOI:

Wenham, G.J., Genesis 16–50 (Word Biblical Commentary 2; Waco, TX: Nelson 1994).

Westermann, C.S., Genesis 12–36. A Commentary (trans. J.J. Scullion; Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg 1985).

Whedbee, J.W., The Bible and the Comic Vision (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press 1998).

Zucker, D.J., “The Deceiver Deceived: Rereading Genesis 27,” Jewish Bible Quarterly 39/1 (2011) 46–58.



Rozonoer, A. (2022). The Portrait of Isaac in Genesis 27: Between Synchronic and Diachronic Readings of Patriarch’s Character. Verbum Vitae, 40(2), 375–385.

Anna Rozonoer
Hellenic College, Boston, MA

Dr. Anna Rozonoer, PhD in Biblical Studies, Hebrew Bible, Boston University, (2014) Independent Scholar; Adjunct Assistant Professor at Hellenic College, Brookline, MA, USA.  
Research interests: The Book of Genesis; Old Testament Wisdom Literature.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The author(s) grant (s) to the Licensee a non-exclusive and royalty-free license in accordance with the provisions of the Appendix: LICENSE TO USE THE WORK