Torah Overtones in the Epilogues of Qoheleth
Stefan M. AttardUniversity of Malta , Malta
This article focuses on the two epilogues of Qoheleth, namely 12:9–11 and 12:12–14 and is an attempt to unravel the relationship of the words of the sage with Torah, the latter featuring as miṣwōṯ in v. 13. It is often held that these epilogues were written by someone other than the author of the book at large, and that their function (especially that of the second one), is to highlight the importance of the Torah over and against the words of the wise. Such a position is hereby contested and a rereading of these epilogues is offered. Two specific questions are addressed: Are these epilogues, particularly the second one, meant to downplay the words of the wise in relation to Torah? Conversely, how do the images employed, namely those of the goad, the nails, and the shepherd, possibly constitute a subtle reference to the divine commandments given by God himself? An analysis of the structures of the two epilogues and of the concepts used – this being done especially through an intertextual reading – is carried out hand in hand with a careful translation of the most pertinent texts. Moreover, the similarity of salient concepts found in the epilogues to Pentateuchal and Prophetic texts that have a pertinent canonical position is highlighted, thereby bearing light on the conclusion of Qoheleth. Finally, certain rabbinical interpretations are employed to further unpack the meaning of the texts in question. This exercise leads the author to hold that a positive relationship between sapiential wisdom and Torah is made both in the final epilogue, where the commandments are mentioned, and also in the first epilogue.
Keywords:Epilogues, Torah, goads and nails, similes and metaphors
Bartholomew, C.G., Reading Ecclesiastes. Old Testament Exegesis and Hermeneutical Theory (Analecta Biblica 139; Roma: Pontificio Istituto Biblico 1998).
Baumann, G., “«Er hat mir den Weg mit Quadersteinen vermauert» (Thr 3,9). Ein Vorschlag zur Auslegung einer ungewöhnlichen Metaphor,” Metaphor in the Hebrew Bible (ed. P. Van Hecke; Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 187; Leuven: Peeters 2005) 139–145.
Blenkinsopp, J., A History of Prophecy in Israel (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox 1996).
Childs, B.S., Introduction to the Old Testament as Scripture (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress 1979).
Crenshaw, J.L., Old Testament Wisdom. An Introduction (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox 2010).
Ballhorn, E., Zum Telos des Psalters. Der Textzusammenhang des Vierten und Fünften Psalmenbuches (Ps 90–150) (Bonner biblische Beiträge 138; Berlin: Philo 2004).
Fox, M.V., “Frame-Narrative and Composition in the Book of Qohelet,” Hebrew Union College Annual 48 (1977) 83–106.
Friberg, T. – Friberg, B. – Miller, N.F., Analytical Lexicon of the Greek New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker 2000).
Gilbert, M., “Giobbe 28 e la Sapienza,” Il salterio e il libro di Giobbe. Seminario per studiosi e docenti di Sacra Scrittura, Roma 20–24 gennaio 2020 (Rome: Gregorian & Biblical Press 2020) 223–233. Görg,
M., “ זהר ,” Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (eds. G.J. Botterweck – H. Ringgren, trans. D.E. Green; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1980) IV, 41–46.
Jastrow, M., A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature (London – New York: Luzac – Putnam 1903) I.
Joüon, P., Grammaire de l’hébreu biblique (Rome: Institut Biblique Pontifical 1947).
Keel, O., The Symbolism of the Biblical World: Ancient near Eastern Iconography and the Book of Psalms (trans. T.J. Hallett; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns 1997).
Labahn, A., “Wild Animals and Chasing Shadows. Animal Metaphors in Lamentations as Indicators for Individual Threat,” Metaphor in the Hebrew Bible (ed. P. Van Hecke; Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 187; Leuven: Peeters 2005) 67–97.
Lohfink, N., Qoheleth. A Continental Commentary (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2003).
Mazzinghi, L., Ho cercato e ho esplorato. Studi sul Qohelet (Bologna: Dehoniane 2001).
Onwukeme, V., The Concept of Hebel (Vanity) and the Meaning of Life in the Book of Qoheleth. If Everything Is Hebel, What Is the Meaning of Life? (Rome: Pontificia Studiorum Universitas a S. Thoma Aq. in Urbe 2004).
Perdue, L.G., “Sages, Scribes, and Seers in Israel and the Ancient near East: An Introduction,” Scribes, Sages, and Seers. The Sage in the Eastern Mediterranean World (ed. L.G. Perdue; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2008).
von Rad, G., Wisdom in Israel (trans. J.D. Martin; London: SCM 1972).
Saidel, B.A., “Pitching Camp: Ethnoarchaeological Investigations of Tent Camps in the Wadi Hisma, Jordan,” Nomads, Tribes, and the State in the Ancient near East. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives (ed. J. Szuchman; Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago 2009) 87–104.
Trebolle Barrera, J.C., “Origins of a Tripartite Old Testament Canon,” The Canon Debate (eds. L.M. McDonald – J.A. Sanders; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson 2002) 128–145.
Van Hecke, P., “Conceptual Blending: A Recent Approach to Metaphor. Illustrated with the Pastoral Metaphor in Hos 4,16,” Metaphor in the Hebrew Bible (ed. P. Van Hecke; Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 187; Leuven: Peeters 2005) 215–231.
Way, K.C., “The Meaning of the Minor Judges: Understanding the Bible’s Shortest Stories,” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 61/2 (2018) 275–285.
Weeks, S., Ecclesiastes 5–12. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary (London: Bloomsbury Clark 2021).
Weeks, S., “‘Fear God and Keep His Commandments’: Could Qohelet Have Said This?,” Wisdom and Torah. The Reception of “Torah” in the Wisdom Literature of the Second Temple Period (eds. B.U. Schipper – D.A. Teeter; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2013) 101–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004257368_007.
Whitcomb, D., “From Pastoral Pleasantry to Tribal Urbanites: Arab Tribes and the Foundation of the Islamic State in Syria,” Nomads, Tribes, and the State in the Ancient near East. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives (ed. J. Szuchman; Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago 2009) 241–259.
Zlotowitz, M., Koheles, Ecclesiastes a New Translation with a Commentary Anthologized from Talmudic, Midrashic and Rabbinic Sources = Megîllat Qōhēlet (New York: Mesorah 1997).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
(1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC license Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
(2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
(3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).