Martha the Hostess and Mary the Listener. A Dialogue with two Feminist Interpretations of Luke 10:38-42
Matteo Crimella
Theological Faculty of Northern Italy, Milan , Italyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0425-3211
Abstract
This article examines the pericope of Lk 10:38-42 through the lens of gender. It presents the specific contributions of E. Schüssler Fiorenza and also M. Perroni, both of whom have interpreted the passage according to a feminist approach. The former has developed some hermeneutical criteria while the latter has insisted on female discipleship, claiming that, for Luke, the women are believers but not missionaries. The present article turns critically on the essential points of the two commentators, showing that a careful philological and contextual analysis does not allow the episode to be read as a representation of ministry in the Church. Instead, Mary’s behaviour of placing herself at the Lord’s feet appears alienating, an action which is both surprising and contrary to the social canons. The episode lays stress on precisely this difference, showing that the two poles are not "service" and "listening" but rather "distracting preoccupations" versus a "disciple’s attitude". The behaviour of the two sisters thus functions as a mirror by which the reader is invited to discern different attitudes towards Jesus.
Keywords:
Luke 10:38-42, feminist criticism, gender approachReferences
Barrett, C.K., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles. II. Introduction and Commentary on Acts XV–XXVIII (The International Critical Commentary; Edinburgh: Clark 1998).
Bergmeier, R., “pou,j,” Exegetisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament (eds. H. Balz – G. Schneider; 2 ed.; Stuttgart – Berlin – Köln: Kohlhammer 1992) III, 343–345.
Beyer, H.W., “diakoni,a,” Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament (eds. G. Kittel – G. Friedrich; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1935) II, 87–88.
Blass, F. – Debrunner, A. – Rehkopf, F., Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Griechisch (18 ed.; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2001).
Bovon, F., L’Évangile selon saint Luc (9, 51 – 14, 35) (Commentaire du Nouveau Testament 3b; Genève: Labor et Fides 1996).
Brutscheck, J., Die Maria-Marta-Erzählung. Eine redaktionskritische Untersuchung zu Lk 10,38–42 (Bonner biblische Beiträge 64; Frankfurt am Main – Bonn: Hanstein 1986).
Collins, J.N., Diakonia. Re-interpreting the Ancient Sources (New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press 1990).
Collins, J.N., “Did Luke Intend a Disservice to Women in the Martha and Mary Story?,” Biblical Theology Bulletin 28 (1998) 104–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014610799802800303. (Crossref)
Collins, J.N., Diakonia Studies. Critical Issues in Ministry (Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press 2014). (Crossref)
Crimella, M., Marta, Marta! Quattro esempi di «triangolo drammatico» nel «grande viaggio di Luca» (Studi e ricerche. Sezione biblica; Assisi: Cittadella 2009).
Crimella, M., “À propos de perispa,omai en Luc 10, 40. Entre philologie et narratologie,” Revue biblique 117 (2010) 120–125.
Culpepper, R.A., “The Gospel of Luke,” R.A. Culpepper – G.R. O’Day, The Gospel of Luke. The Gospel of John (The New Interpreter’s Bible 9; Nashville, TN: Abingdon 1995) 1–490.
Dupont, J., “De quoi est-il besoin (Lc x.42)?,” Text and Interpretation. Studies in the New Testament Presented to Matthew Black (eds. E. Best – R.McL. Wilson; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1979) 115–120.
Dupont, J., “Marta e Maria. Lc 10,38–42,” La Scala 46 (1992) 213–225.
Ernst, A.E., Martha from the Margins. The Authority of Martha in Early Christian Tradition (Supplements to Vigiliæ Christianæ 98; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2009). (Crossref)
Fee, G.D., “‘One Thing Is Needful’? Luke 10:42,” New Testament Textual Criticism. Its Significance for Exegesis. Essays in Honour of Bruce M. Metzger (eds. E.J. Epp – G.D. Fee; Oxford: Clarendon 1981) 61–75.
Grelot, P., La condition de la femme d’après le Nouveau Testament (Paris: Desclée de Brouwer 1995).
Hentschel, A., Diakonia im Neuen Testament. Studien zur Semantik unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rolle von Frauen (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2.226; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2007). (Crossref)
Ilan, T., Jewish Women in Greco-Roman Palestine. An Inquiry into Image and Status (Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 44; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1995).
Jeremias, J., Jerusalem zur Zeit Jesu. Kulturgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur neutestamentlichen Zeitgeschichte (2 ed.; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1958).
Koet, B.J. – North, W.E.S., “The Image of Martha in Luke 10,38–42 and in John 11,1–12,8,” Miracles and Imagery in Luke and John. Festschrift Ulrich Busse (eds. J. Verheyden – G. Van Belle – J.G. Van der Watt; Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium
; Leuven – Paris – Dudley, MA: Peeters 2008) 47–66.
Koperski, V., “Luke 10,38–42 and Acts 6,1–7: Women and Discipleship in the Literary Context of Luke-Acts,” The Unity of Luke–Acts (ed. J. Verheyden; Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum
Lovaniensium 142; Leuven: Leuven University Press – Peeters 1999) 517–544.
Martini, C.M., Il problema della recensionalità del codice B alla luce del papiro Bodmer XIV (Analecta Biblica 26; Roma: Pontificio Istituto Biblico 1966).
Metzger, B.M., A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. Second Edition. A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament (Fourth Revised Edition) (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft – United Bible Societies 1994).
Perroni, M., “Il Cristo maestro (Lc 10,38–42). L’apoftegma di Marta e Maria: problemi di critica testuale,” Mysterium Christi. Symbolgegenwart und theologische Bedeutung. Festschrift für Basil Studer (eds. M. Löhrer – E. Salmann; Studia Anselmiana 116; Roma: Pontificio Ateneo S. Anselmo 1995) 57–78.
Perroni, M., “Discepole di Gesù,” Donne e Bibbia. Storia ed esegesi (ed. A. Valerio; La Bibbia nella storia 21; Bologna: Dehoniane 2006) 197–240.
Perroni, M., “Discepole, ma non apostole: l’opera di Luca,” I Vangeli. Narrazioni e storia (eds. M. Navarro Puerto – M. Perroni; La Bibbia e le donne 2.1; Trapani: Il pozzo di Giacobbe 2012) 177–214.
Reid, B.E., Choosing the Better Part? Women in the Gospel of Luke (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press 1996).
Schüssler Fiorenza, E., “Theological Criteria and Historical Reconstruction: Martha and Mary, Luke 10:38–42,” Protocol of the Fifty-Third Colloquy. 10 April 1986 (ed. H. Waetjen; Berkeley, CA: Center for Hermeneutical Studies in Hellenistic and Modern Culture 1987) 1–12.
Walker, W.O., “Martha and Mary in the Third and Fourth Gospels: An Exercise in Source Criticism,” Gospels, Jesus, and Christian Origins. Collected Essays (Santa Rosa, OR: Polebridge 2015) 129–147.
Wyant, J.S., Beyond Mary or Martha. Reclaiming Ancient Models of Discipleship (Emory Studies in Early Christianity 21; Atlanta, GA: SBL 2019). (Crossref)
Yamaguchi, S., Mary and Martha. Women in the World of Jesus (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books 2002).
Zorell, F., Lexicon græcum Novi Testamenti (5 ed.; Roma: Pontificio Istituto Biblico 1999).
Theological Faculty of Northern Italy, Milan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0425-3211
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author(s) grant (s) to the Licensee a non-exclusive and royalty-free license in accordance with the provisions of the Appendix: LICENSE TO USE THE WORK
