Women Witnesses to the Risen Lord
Abstract
Under Jewish law, the witnessing of Jesus as resurrected must occur by the third-day after death. Later witnessing can be corroborative, but the third-day witnessing is crucial. In Matthew and John, the sole percipient witnesses on the third-day are women, plural in Matthew, a single woman in John. This seems to cast doubt on Jesus’ resurrection because in Greek, Roman, and Jewish culture, women were ineligible as witnesses or were considered vastly inferior as witnesses to men. Celsus inveighed, “Who saw this? A hysterical female!” Communicating to outsiders, having women witness casts aspersions on Jesus’ resurrection making Christianity appear unthreatening to the imperial order. However, for Jews aware of the celebrated exception in the Pharisaic/rabbinic oral law/tradition that accepted women’s testimony in the circumstances found in the gospels, having specifically women witness makes their testimony more credible than had the witnesses been men or any combination of men and women. Women witnessing the risen Lord fits within the interstices of the Law, so that, not just human testimony, but the Law lends its imprimatur endorsing Jesus.
Keywords:
Agunah, genre, novel, resurrection, testimony, third-day, witness, womenReferences
Ahl, F., “The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome,” The American Journal of Philology 105 (1984) 174–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/294874.
Allison, D.C., Resurrecting Jesus. The Earliest Christian Traditions and its Interpreters (New York – London: Clark 2005).
Attridge, H.W., “Genre Bending in the Fourth Gospel,” Journal of Biblical Literature 121/1 (2002) 3–21.
Auerbach, E., Mimesis. The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (trans. W. Trask; Princeton: Princeton University Press 1953).
Barker, J.W., John’s Use of Matthew (Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University; Nashville, TN 2011) https://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-07222011–165009 (access 21.10.2022).
Basser, H.W., “The Gospels Would Have Been Greek to Jesus,” Who Was Jesus. A Jewish-Christian Dialogue (eds. P. Copan – C.A. Evans; Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox 2001) 111–124.
Basser, H.W., The Mind Behind the Gospels. A Commentary on Matthew 1–14 (Leiden: Brill 2015).
Basser, H.W., “Planting Christian Trees in Jewish Soil,” Review of Rabbinic Judaism 8 (2005) 91–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157007005774513918.
Basser, H.W. – Cohen, M.B., The Gospel of Matthew and Judaic Traditions. A Relevance-based Commentary (Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2015).
Bauckham, R., “The Gospel of John and the Synoptic Problem,” New Studies in the Synoptic Problem. Oxford Conference, April 2008. Essays in Honor of Christopher M. Tuckett (eds. P. Foster et al.; Leuven – Paris – Walpole, MA: Peeters 2011) 657–688.
Bauckham, R., Gospel Women. Studies of the Named Women in the Gospels (Edinburgh: Clark 2002).
Baumgarten, A.I., “Marcel Simon’s ‘Versus Israel’ as a Contribution to Jewish History,” The Harvard Theological Review 92/4 (1999) 465–478.
Beard, M. – North, J. – Price, S., Religions of Rome. I. A History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998).
Beavis, M.A., “Reconsidering Mary of Bethany,” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 74/2 (2012) 281–297.
Beavis, M.A. – Kateusz, A. (eds.), Rediscovering the Marys. Maria, Marianne, Miriam (London – New York: Clark 2020).
Berger, J., “Rabbi Simcha Krauss, Advocate for Orthodox Women, Dies at 84,” The New York Times February 15, 2022, A17.
Bonney, W., Caused to Believe. The Doubting Thomas Story as the Climax of John’s Christological Narrative (Leiden: Brill 2002).
Brewer, D.I., “Review Article: The Use of Rabbinic Sources in Gospel Studies,” Tyndale Bulletin 50/2 (1999) 281–298.
Brown, R.E., The Gospel According to John (xiii–xxi). Introduction, Translation, and Notes (Garden City, NY: Doubleday 1970).
Brown, R.E., “Roles of Women in the Fourth Gospel, Theological Studies 36 (1975) 688–699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004056397503600406.
Brundage, J.A., “Juridical Space: Female Witnesses in Canon Law,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 52 (1998) 147–156.
Bultmann, R., The Gospel of John: A Commentary (trans. G.R. Beasley-Murray; eds. R.W. N. Hoare – J.K. Riches; Philadelphia PA: Westminster 1971).
Cambe, M., “L’influence du Cantique des cantiques sur le Nouveau Testament”, Revue Thomiste 62 (1962) 5–26.
Cohn, H.H., “Witness,” Encyclopaedia Judaica (ed. F. Skolnik; 2 ed.; Detroit, MI et al.: Gale 2007) XXI, 115–116.
Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments, Decree The First Witness of the Resurrection (June 3, 2016).
Daube, D., “The Law of Witnesses in Transferred Operation,” The Collected Works of David Daube. I. Talmudic Law (ed. C.M. Carmichael; Berkeley, CA: Robbins Collection 1992) 396–399.
Daube, D., “Lex Talionis,” The Collected Works of David Daube. III. Biblical Law and Literature (ed. C.M. Carmichael; Berkeley, CA: Robbins Collection 2003) 203–239.
Daube, D., “Two Tripartite Forms,” The Collected Works of David Daube. II. New Testament Judaism (ed. C.M. Carmichael; Berkeley, CA: Robbins Collection 2000) 389–410.
Daube, D., “Witnesses in Bible and Talmud,” The Collected Works of David Daube. I. Talmudic Law (ed. C.M. Carmichael; Berkeley, CA: Robbins Collection 1992) 401–423.
Davies, P.R. – Taylor, J.E., “On the Testimony of Women in 1Qsa,” Dead Sea Discoveries 3/3 (1996) 223–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156851796X00011.
Dillon, M., “By Gods, Tongues, and Dogs: The Use of Oaths in Aristophanic Comedy,” Greece & Rome 2nd Series 42/2 (1995) 135–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500025584.
Dinkler, M.B., Literary Theory and the New Testament (New Haven, CT – London: Yale University Press 2019).
Dodd, C.H., Historical Tradition in the Fourth Gospel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1965).
Erskine, A., “Greek Gifts and Roman Suspicion,” Classics Ireland 4 (1997) 33–45.
van den Eynde, S., “Love, Strong as Death? An Inter- and Intratextual Perspective on John 20, 1–18”, The Death of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel. Colloquium Biblicum Lovaniense LIV (2005) (ed. G. van Belle; Bibliotheca Ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium 200;
Leuven: Leuven University Press – Peeters 2007) 901–912.
Faust, A., “Early Israel: An Egalitarian Society,” Biblical Archaeology Review 39/4 (2013) 45–48, 62–63.
Feeney, A. – Heit, E. (eds.), Inductive Reasoning. Experimental, Developmental, and Computational Approaches (New York: Cambridge University Press 2007).
Fehribach, A., “The ‘Birthing’ Bridegroom: The Portrayal of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel,”A Feminist Companion to John (eds. A.-J. Levine – M. Blichenstaff; New York: Sheffield Academic Press 2003) II, 104–129.
Fehribach, A., The Women in the Life of the Bridegroom. A Feminist Historical-Literary Analysis of the Female Characters in the Fourth Gospel (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press 1998).
Franco, C., Shameless. The Canine and the Feminine in Ancient Greece (trans. M. Fox; Oakland, CA: University of California Press 2014).
Gerdmar, A., Roots of Theological Anti-Semitism. German Biblical Interpretation and the Jews, from Herder and Semler to Kittel and Bultmann (Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2009).
Gilat, Y.D., “Yevamot,” Encyclopaedia Judaica (ed. F. Skolnik; 2 ed.; Detroit, MI et al.: Gale 2007) XXI, 324.
Gordon, R., “Superstitio, Superstition and Religious Repression in the Late Roman Republic and Principate (100 BCE–300 CE),” Past & Present 199/3 (2008) 72–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtm060.
Halivni, D.W., The Formation of the Babylonian Talmud (trans. J.L. Rubenstein; New York: Oxford University Press 2013).
Heil, J.P., “The Narrative Structure of Matthew 27:55–28:20,” Journal of Biblical Literature 110/3 (1991) 419–438.
Holtz, S.E., “‘To Go and Marry any Man That You Please’: A Study of the Formulaic Antecedents of the Rabbinic Writ of Divorce,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 60/4 (2001) 241–258.
van Hout, E., “Gender and Authority of Oral Witnesses in Europe (800–1300),” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society Sixth Series 9 (1999) 201–220.
Ilan, T., Jewish Women in Greco-Roman Palestine. An Inquiry into Image and Status (Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 44; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1995).
Jackson, B.S., “Legalism,” Journal of Jewish Studies 30/1 (1979) 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18647/886/JJS-1979.
Jacobs, L., Studies in Talmudic Logic and Methodology (London: Valentine – Mitchell 1961).
John Paul II, Mary Was Witness to Whole Paschal Mystery (General Audience, May 21, 1997) https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/audiences/1997/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_21051997.html (access 21.10.2022).
John Paul II, Return to the Subject of Human Love in the Divine Plan (General Audience, May 23, 1984).
de Jong, I.J.F., Narrative in Drama. The Art of the Euripidean Messenger Speech (Leiden: Brill 1991).
Kashani, R., “Burial,” Encyclopaedia Judaica (ed. F. Skolnik; 2 ed.; Detroit, MI et al.: Gale 2007) IV, 291–294.
Katz, J.T., “Testimonia ritus Italici: Male Genitalia, Solemn Declarations, and a New Latin Sound Law,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 98 (1998) 183–217.
Kot, P., “Jesus and the Woman of Samaria (John 4:7b-15). From the Heritage of Tradition to the Mystery of Faith,” The Biblical Annals 10/4 (2020) 615–636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.8674.
Kraemer, D., The Meanings of Death in Rabbinic Judaism (London – New York: Routledge 2000).
Kubiś, A., “The Creation Theme in the Gospel of John,” Collectanea Theologica 90/5 (2020) 375–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.2020.90.5.16.
Kubiś, A., “The Literary Form and Message of John 8:31–36,” The Biblical Annals 4 (2014) 121–145.
Kubiś, A., “Roman versus Jewish Reckoning of Hours in the Gospel of John: An Exegetical Misconception That Refuses to Die,” The Biblical Annals 11/2 (2021) 247–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.12233.
Kubiś, A., “The Old Testament Background of «Ecce Homo» in John 19:5,” Biblica et Patristica Thorunensia 11/4 (2018) 495–519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/BPTh.2018.024.
Kubiś, A., “Zechariah 6:12–13 as the Referent of γραφή in John 2:22 and 20:9,” The Biblical Annals 2 (2012) 153–194.
Larsen, K.B. (ed.), The Gospel of John as Genre Mosaic (Studia Aarhusiana Neotestamentica 3; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2015).
Larson, J., “Paul’s Masculinity,” Journal of Biblical Literature 123/1 (2004) 85–97.
Lea, H.C., Superstition and Force. Torture, Ordeal, and Trial by Combat in Medieval Law (New York: Barnes & Noble 1996 [1870]).
Levinson, J., “An-Other Woman: Joseph and Potiphar’s Wife. Staging the Body Politic,” The Jewish Quarterly Review NS 87/3–4 (1997) 269–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1455187.
Levy, Y.V., “The Agunah and the Missing Husband: An American Solution to a Jewish Problem,”Journal of Law and Religion 10/1 (1993–1994) 49–71.
Luz, U., Matthew 21–28. A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg – Fortress 2005).
Maccini, R.G., Her Testimony is True. Women as Witnesses According to John (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 1966).
Maccoby, H., Philosophy of the Talmud (London – New York: RoutledgeCurzon 2002).
McCasland, S.V., “The Scriptural Basis of ‘On the Third Day,’” Journal of Biblical Literature 48/3–4 (1929) 124–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3259719.
McWhirter, J., The Bridegroom Messiah and the People of God. Marriage in the Fourth Gospel (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 138; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006).
Melzer, A., “On the Pedagogical Motive for Esoteric Writing,” The Journal of Politics 69/4 (2007) 1015–1031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–2508.2007.00604.x.
Mickiewicz, F., “Theologization of Greek Terms and Concepts in the Septuagint and New Testament,”Verbum Vitae 39/3 (2021) 751–769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/vv.11109.
Moore, G.F., “Christian Writers on Judaism,” The Harvard Theological Review 14/3 (1921) 197–254.
Moscovitz, L., Talmudic Reasoning: From Casuistics to Conceptualization (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2002).
Neusner, J., Eliezer ben Hyrcanus. The Tradition and the Man, Part Two (Leiden: Brill 1973).
Neusner, J., Hosea in Talmud and Midrash (Lanham, MD: University Press of America 2007).
O’Brien, K.S., “Written That You May Believe: John 20 and Narrative Rhetoric,” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 67/2 (2005) 284–302.
Olson, T., “Of Enchantment: The Passing of Ordeals and the Rise of the Jury Trial,” Syracuse Law Review 50 (2000) 109–196
Osiek, C., “The Women at the Tomb: What are They Doing There?,” A Feminist Companion to Matthew (eds. A.-J. Levine – M. Blichenstaff; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press 2001) 205–220.
Pao, D.W., “Waiters or Preachers: Acts 6:1–7 and the Lukan Table Fellowship Motif,” Journal of Biblical Literature 130/1 (2011) 127–144.
Parker, R., Miasma. Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1983).
Paterson, J., “Divorce and Desertion in the Old Testament,” Journal of Biblical Literature 51/2 (1932) 161–170.
Pinkard, T., Hegel. A Biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000).
Reardon, B.P., Collected Ancient Greek Novels (Berkley: University of California Press 1989).
Roberts Winsor, A., A King is Bound in the Tresses. Allusions to the Song of Songs in the Fourth Gospel (Studies in Biblical Literature 6; New York: Lang 1999).
Roth, M.T., Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor (2 ed.; Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press 1997).
Roth, M.T., “The Neo-Babylonian Widow,” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 43–45 (1991–1993) 1–26.
Saiman, C., “Legal Theology: The Turn to Conceptualism in Nineteenth-Century Jewish Law,”Journal of Law and Religion 21/1 (2005–2006) 39–100.
Saltman, A., “Rabanus Maurus and the Pseudo-Hieronymian ‘Quaestiones Hebraicaae in Libros Regum et Paralipomenon,’” Harvard Theological Review 66/1 (1973) 43–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000003023.
Schnackenburg, R., The Gospel According to St. John (New York: Crossroad 1982) III.
Setzer, C., “Excellent Women: Female Witness to the Resurrection,” Journal of Biblical Literature 116/2 (1997) 259–272.
Silberg, M., Talmudic Law and the Modern State (trans. B.Z. Bodeser; ed. M.S. Weiner; New York: Burning Bush Press 1973 [1961]).
Simmonds, A., “Caiaphas, Johannes Romanus: John’s Imperial Audience,” https://www.academia.edu/16517206/caiaphas_johannes_romanus_john_s_imperial_roman_audience (access 21.10.2022).
Simmonds, A., “Christianity and the Imperial Cult: Jewish and Roman Sacred Law Share a Direct Common Origin,” https://www.academia.edu/16517442/christianity_and_the_imperial_cult_jewish_and_roman_sacred_law_share_a_direct_common_origin (access 21.10.2022).
Simmonds, A.R., “‘His Blood on Us and on Our Children’ (Mt. 27.25) is Modeled on Oedipus’s Unwitting Kinship Oath to His Father in Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus,” Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism 16 (2020) 30–64.
Simmonds, A.R., “Indirect Causation: A Reminder from the Biblical Goring Ox Rule for Fraud on the Market Securities Litigation,” Kentucky Law Journal 88/3 (2000) 641–686.
Simmonds, A.R., “Judas Iscariot and Joseph of Arimathea: Two Gentile Graves for Two Jewish Corpses,” Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism 17 (2021) 147–179.
Simmonds, A., “Mark’s and Matthew’s Sub Rosa Message in the Scene of Pilate and the Crowd,”Journal of Biblical Literature 131/4 (2012) 733–754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/23488265.
Simmonds, A.R., “Measure for Measure: Two Misunderstood Principles of Damages, Exodus 21:22–25, ‘Life for Life, Eye for Eye,’ and Matthew 5:38–39, ‘Turn the Other Cheek,’”St. Thomas Law Review 17 (2004–2005) 123–172.
Simmonds, A.R., “Woe to You . . . Hypocrites!’ Re-reading Matthew 23:13–36,” Bibliotheca Sacra 166 (2009) 336–349.
Sion, A., Judaic Logic. A Formal Analysis of Biblical, Talmudic and Rabbinic Logic (Geneva: Slatkine 1995).
Smith, D.M., John Among the Gospels (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press 2001).
Stein, P., “The Two Schools of Jurists in the Early Roman Principate,” Cambridge Law Journal 31/1 (1972) 8–31.
Stol, M., “Women in Mesopotamia,” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 38/2 (1995) 123–144.
Šubrt, J., “Jesus and Aeneas (The Epic Mutation of the Gospel Story in the Paraphrase of Juvencus),”Listy filologicke 116 (1993) 10–17.
Thomas, J.C., “The Fourth Gospel and Rabbinic Judaism,” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der Älteren Kirche 82 (1991) 159–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zntw.1991.82.3-4.159.
Villeneuve, A., Nuptial Symbolism in Second Temple Writings, the New Testament and Rabbinic Literature. Divine Marriage at Key Moments of Salvation History (Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 92; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2016).
Watson, A., “Roman Law,” Civilizations of the Ancient Mediterranean. Greece and Rome (eds. M. Grant – R. Kitzinger; New York: Scribner’s 1988) I, 607–629.
Wenger, J.R., Chattel or Person? The Status of Women in the Mishnah (New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988).
Wijngaards, J., “Death and Resurrection in Covenantal Context (Hos. VI 2),” Vetus Testamentum 17/2 (1967) 226–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853367X00493.
Winandy, J., “Le Cantique des Cantiques et le Nouveau Testament”, Revue Biblique 71/2 (1964) 161–190.
Zeitlin, S., “The Halaka: Introduction to Tannaitic Jurisprudence,” The Jewish Quarterly Review NS 39/1 (1948) 1–40.
Andrew Simmonds hold a Bachelor of Arts in history from George Washington University, a Juris Doctors from the University of Miami Law School, and a Masters in Law in taxation from New York University Law School. For forty years he practiced law on Wall Street, initially as an orator in trial and appellate courts and subsequently advising clients in matters relating to major financial frauds. He has lectured at Cornell University and has published numerous articles in law reviews and biblical scholarship journals.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8392-7025License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author(s) grant (s) to the Licensee a non-exclusive and royalty-free license in accordance with the provisions of the Appendix: LICENSE TO USE THE WORK
