Christian Apophaticism in Jean-Luc Marion’s Early Works

Johannes Zachhuber

University of Oxford , United Kingdom
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-0711


Abstract

In this article, I investigate Jean-Luc Marion’s early interpretation of Christian apophaticism with special reference to his reading of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. I observe that the most remarkable, but rarely noted, aspect of this interpretation is Marion’s avoidance of the typical derivation of Dionysius’ negative theology from the Platonic tradition. Instead, he places him in the tradition of the critique of idols in the Old Testament. I argue that this intuition should not be lightly dismissed as early Christian apophaticism was at least partly developed in the context of Christian polemic against pagan idolatry. If Christian apophaticism is understood against this background, Marion’s claim that it foreshadows the modern and postmodern critique of theism appears more plausible than his detractors have been willing to admit.

Keywords:

apophaticism, Ps.-Dionysius, phenomenology, Jean-Luc Marion, idolatry, metaphysics, postmodern theology, Jacques Derrida

Ancient sources

Aristides, Apologia (ed. J. A. Robinson; Texts and Studies 1; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1891).

Anonymous, Epistula ad Diognetum, in Anonyme, À Diognète (ed. H.-I. Marrou; Sources chrétiennes 33 bis; 2 ed.; Paris: Cerf 1965).

Clemens Alexandrinus, Stromateis, in Clement of Alexandria, Stromateis (ed. L. Früchtel – O. Stählin – U. Treu; Griechische christliche Schriftsteller; 3 ed.; Berlin: Akademie Verlag 1960–1970) I–II.

Justin, Apologia prima, in Justin, Philosopher and Martyr, Apologies (eds. D. Minns – P. Parvis; Oxford Early Christian Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009) 80–268.

Maximus Confessor, Capita de caritate, in Massimo Confessore, Capitoli sulla carità (ed. A. Ceresa Gastaldo; Rome: Editrice Studium 1963).

Plato, Epistulae, in Platonis Opera. V. Tetralogia IX Definitiones et Spuria (ed. J. Burnet; Oxford: Oxford University Press 1907). (Crossref)

Plato, Parmenides, in Platonis Opera. II. Tetralogia III–IV (ed. J. Burnet; Oxford: Oxford University Press 1901).

Plato, Respublica (ed. S.R. Slings; Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003).

Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita, De mystica theologia, in Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita, Corpus Dionysiacum. II. Pseudo Dionysius Areopagita, De coelesti hierarchia, De ecclesiastica hierarchia, De mystica theologia, Epistulae (eds. G. Heil – A. M. Ritter; Patristische Texte und Studien 67; 2 ed.; Berlin: de Gruyter 2012) 133–210; English trans. P. Rorem – C. Luibhéid, Pseudo-Dionysius. The Complete Works (New York: Paulist Press 1987), 133–140.

Modern Literature

Athanassiadi, P. – Frede, M. (eds.), Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity (Oxford: Clarendon 1999).

von Balthasar, H.U., The Glory of the Lord. Studies in Theological Style. II. Clerical Styles (London: Continuum 1985). (Crossref)

Barth, K., Die kirchliche Dogmatik (Zürich: Theologischer Verlag 1932) I/1.

Bonnefoy, Y., Greek and Egyptian Mythologies (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press 1992).

Bruaire, C., Le Droit de Dieu (Paris: Aubier Montaigne 1974).

Caputo, J.D. – Scanlon, M.D. (eds.), God, the Gift, and Postmodernism (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press 1999).

Carabine, D., The Unknown God. Negative Theology in the Platonic Tradition. Plato to Eriugena (Louvain Theological and Pastoral Monographs 19; Louvain: Peeters 1995).

Carlson, T.A. “Translator’s Introduction,” J.-L. Marion, The Idol and Distance. Five Studies (trans. T.A. Carlson; New York: Fordham University Press 2001) xi-xxxi.

Daniélou, J., Platonisme et théologie mystique. Essai sur la doctrine spirituelle de Saint Grégoire de Nysse (Paris: Montaigne 1953).

Davies, O. – Turner, D., “Introduction,” Silence and the Word. Negative Theology and Incarnation (eds. O. Davies – D. Turner; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002) 1–10. (Crossref)

Dodds, E.R., “The Parmenides of Plato and the Origin of the Neoplatonic ‘One’,” The Classical Quarterly 22/3–4 (1928) 129–142. (Crossref)

Hägg, H.F., Clement of Alexandria and the Beginnings of Christian Apophaticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006). (Crossref)

Harnack, A., Der Vorwurf des Atheismus in den drei ersten Jahrhunderten (Leipzig: Hinrichs 1905). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31826/9781463228460-001. (Crossref)

Heidegger, M., Wegmarken (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann 1967).

Horner, R., Jean-Luc Marion. A Theo-logical Introduction (Aldershot: Ashgate 2005).

Janicaud, D., “The Theological Turn of French Phenomenology,” Phenomenology and the “Theological Turn”. The French Debate (eds. D. Janicaud et al.; New York: Fordham University Press 2000) 16–103.

Jones, T., “Dionysius in Hans Urs von Balthasar and Jean-Luc Marion,” Modern Theology 24/4 (2008) 743–754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2008.00497.x. Reprinted in S. Coakley – C.M. Stang (eds.), Re-Thinking Dionysius the Areopagite (Oxford: Wiley- (Crossref)

Blackwell 2009) 213–224.

Jones, T., A Genealogy of Marion’s Philosophy of Religion. Apparent Darkness (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press 2011).

Jüngel, E., God as the Mystery of the World. On the Foundation of the Theology of the Crucified One in the Dispute between Theism and Atheism (trans. D.L. Guder; London: Bloomsbury 2014).

Kerr, F., After Aquinas. Versions of Thomism (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell 2002). (Crossref)

Koch, H., Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita in seinen Beziehungen zum Neuplatonismus und Mysterienwesen. Eine litterarhistorische Untersuchung (Mainz: Kirchheim 1900).

Laird, M., “‘Whereof We Speak’: Gregory of Nyssa, Jean-Luc Marion and the Current Apophatic Rage,” The Heythrop Journal 42/1 (2001) 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2265.00151. (Crossref)

Levinas, E., Totality and Infinity. An Essay on Exteriority (Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press 2007).

López, A., Spirit’s Gift. The Metaphysical Insight of Claude Bruaire (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press 2006).

Louth, A., Maximus the Confessor (London: Routledge 1996).

Louth, A., Denys the Areopagite (London: Continuum 2001).

Louth, A., The Origins of the Christian Mystical Tradition. From Plato to Denys (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007). (Crossref)

Luther, M., D. Martin Luthers Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Weimar: Böhlau 1883–2009) I-LX (= Weimarer Ausgabe).

Luther, M., The Church Held Captive in Babylon (ed., trans. D. Janz; Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019).

Mainoldi, E., Dietro “Dionigi l’Areopagita”. La genesi e gli scopi del Corpus Dionysiacum (Rome: Città Nuova 2018).

Marion, J.-L., “La double idolâtrie: Remarques sur la difference ontologique et la pensée de Dieu,” Heidegger et la question de Dieu (eds. R. Kearney – J.S. O’Leary; Paris: Presses universitaires de France 2009) 67–94.

Marion, J.-L., God Without Being. Hors-Texte (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press 1991). French original: J.-L. Marion, Dieu sans l'être. Hors texte (Paris: Fayard 1982).

Marion, J.-L., Reduction and Givenness. Investigations of Husserl (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press 1998).

Marion, J.-L., “In the Name: How to Avoid Speaking of ‘Negative Theology’,” God, the Gift, and Postmodernism (eds. J.D. Caputo – M.D. Scanlon; Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press 1999) 20–42.

Marion, J.-L., The Idol and Distance. Five Studies (trans. T.A. Carlson; New York: Fordham University Press 2001). French original: Marion, J.-L., L’idole et la distance. Cinq études (Paris: Grasset 1977).

Marion, J.-L., Being Given. Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press 2002).

Marion, J.-L., Au lieu de soi. L’approche de Saint Augustin (Paris: Presses universitaires de France 2008). (Crossref)

Marion, J.-L. – Littlejohn, M.E. – Rumpza, S., “From Idolatry to Revelation: A Conversation with Jean-Luc Marion,” Journal for Continental Philosophy of Religion 2/2 (2020) 208–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/25889613-00202006. (Crossref)

Marion, J.-L., D’ailleurs, la révélation (Paris: Grasset 2020).

Mooney, T., “Hubris und Humility: Husserl’s Reduction and Givenness,” Givenness and God. Questions of Jean-Luc Marion (eds. I.G. Leask – E.G. Cassidy; New York: Fordham University Press 2005) 47–68. (Crossref)

Mortley, R., From Word to Silence (Bonn: Hanstein 1986) I–II. Osborn, E.F., Justin Martyr (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1973).

Palmer, D.W., “Atheism, Apologetic, and Negative Theology in the Greek Apologists of the Second Century,” Vigiliae Christianae 37/3 (1983) 234–259. (Crossref)

Rorem, P., “Negative Theologies and the Cross,” Harvard Theological Review 101/3–4 (2008) 451–464. (Crossref)

Sandnes, K.O., “Paul and Socrates: the Aim of Paul’s Areopagus Speech,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 15 (1993) 13–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X9301505002. (Crossref)

Soards, M.L., The Speeches in Acts. Their Content, Context, and Concerns (Lexington, KY: Westminster John Knox 1994).

Stiglmayr, J., “Der Neuplatoniker Proclus als Vorlage des sogenannten Dionysius Areopagita in der Lehre vom Übel,” Historisches Jahrbuch 16 (1895) 253–273; 721–748.

Wear, S.K. – Dillon, J.M., Dionysius the Areopagite and the Neoplatonist Tradition. Despoiling the Hellenes (Aldershot: Ashgate 2007).

Yocum, J., “A Cry of Dereliction? Reconsidering a Recent Theological Commonplace,” International Journal of Systematic Theology 7/1 (2005) 72–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2400.2005.00152.X. (Crossref)

Zachhuber, J., “Jean-Luc Marion’s Reading of Dionysius the Areopagite. Hermeneutics and Reception History,” Reading the Church Fathers (eds. S. Douglass – M. Ludlow; Edinburgh: Clark 2011) 3–22.

Zachhuber, J., “Luther on Dionysius,” The Oxford Handbook of Dionysius the Areopagite (eds. M. Edwards – D. Pallis – G. Steiris; Oxford: Oxford University Press 2022) 516–534. (Crossref)

Download

Published
2023-10-03


Zachhuber, J. (2023). Christian Apophaticism in Jean-Luc Marion’s Early Works. Verbum Vitae, 41(3), 767–788. https://doi.org/10.31743/vv.16158



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The author(s) grant (s) to the Licensee a non-exclusive and royalty-free license in accordance with the provisions of the Appendix: LICENSE TO USE THE WORK