Apophasis and System. Dogmatic Theology in Apophatic Perspective
Robert Woźniak
The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Kraków , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-1514
Abstract
The subject of the article is the nature of theological apophasis in relation to the systematic aspirations of theological reflection. This relationship is analyzed from the perspective of the three essential truths of Christianity that form the hard core of its message: the Trinity, the personal union of the two natures in Christ, and deification. Accordingly, Trinitarian theology, Christology and anthropology are characterized, each area separately and in relation to the others, by a high degree of systematization. They constitute compact, organic and interrelated theological systems which, as constituent parts, form an organic whole. All three contain significant apophatic themes. An analysis of the connection between their systematicity and their apophatic dimension allows us to draw broader and more general conclusions about apophaticism in general and its place in theological systematization.
Keywords:
Trinity, Christ, Trinitarian theology, Christology, theological anthropology, deification, dogmatics, system, apophasisReferences
Brown, N. – Simmons, A.J. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy (London: Palgrave 2017).
Bruaire, C., Le droit de Dieu (Paris: Aubier Montaigne 1974).
Coakley, S., “What Does Chalcedon Solve and What Does It Not? Some Reflections on the Status and Meaning of the Chalcedonian ‘Definition’,” The Incarnation. An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God (eds. S.T. Davis – D. Kendall – G. O’Collins; Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002) 143–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199248451.003.0007.
Coward, H. – Fosbay, T. (eds.), Derrida and Negative Theology (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press 1992).
Douglass, S., Theology of the Gap. Cappadocian Language Theory and the Trinitarian Controversy (Oxford: Lang 2005).
Douglass, S., “Diastêma,” Brill Dictionary of Gregory of Nyssa (eds. L.F. Mateo-Seco – G. Maspero; Leiden: Brill 2009) 227–228.
Feiner, J. – Löhrer, M. (eds.), Mysterium Salutis. Grundriss heilsgeschichtlicher Dogmatik (Einsiedeln – Zürich: Benziger 1965–1976).
Francis, Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium (2013).
Gschwandtner, C.M., Postmodern Apologetics? Arguments for God in Contemporary Philosophy (New York: Fordham University Press 2012).
Hass, A.W., “Hegel and the Negation of the Apophatic,” Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy (eds. N. Brown – J.A. Simmons; London: Palgrave 2017) 131–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65900-8_9.
Heidegger, M., “Phenomenology and Theology,” M. Heidegger, Pathmarks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998) 39–62.
Humbrecht, T.-D., Théologie négative et noms divins chez Saint Thomas d’Aquin (Paris: Vrin 2006).
Humbrecht, T.-D., Trinité et création au prisme de la voie negative chez Saint Thomas d’Aquin (Paris: Parole et Silence 2011).
Lafont, G., Peut-on connaître Dieu en Jésus-Christ? Problématique (Paris: Cerf 1969).
Larchet, J.-C., Personne at nature (Paris: Cerf 2011).
Lévy, A., Le créé et l’incréé. Maxime le confesseur et Thomas d’Aquin – Aux sources de la querelle palamienne (Paris: Vrin 2006).
de Lubac, H., The Drama of Atheist Humanism (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press 1995).
de Lubac, H., The Mystery of the Supernatural (New York: Crossroad 1998).
Maspero, G., “Ontologia e dogma: il ruolo della schesis nella dottrina trinitaria greca,” Annales Theologici 27 (2013) 293–342.
McCormack, B.L., The Humility of the Eternal Son. Reformed Kenoticism and the Repair of Chalcedon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021).
Need, S.W., Human Language and Knowledge in the Light of Chalcedon (New York – Frankfurt: Lang 1996).
Ojell, A., “Apophatic Theology,” Brill Dictionary of Gregory of Nyssa (eds. L.F. Mateo-Seco – G. Maspero, Leiden: Brill 2009) 68–73.
Papanikolaou, A., Being With God. Trinity, Apophaticism, and Divine-Human Communion (Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press 2006).
Patterson, C., Chalcedonian Personalism (Oxford: Lang 2016).
Price, R. (ed.), The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon (Translated Texts for Historians 45; Liverpool: Liverpool University Press 2007) II.
Raffray, M., Métaphysique des relations chez Albert le Grand et Thomas d’Aquin (Paris: Vrin 2023).
Rocca, G.P., Speaking the Incomprehensible God. Thomas Aquinas on the Interplay of Positive and Negative Theology (Washington, DC:The Catholic University of America Press 2008).
Stępień, T. – Kochańczyk-Bonińska, K., Unknown God, Known in His Activities. Incomprehensibility of God during the Trinitarian Controversy of the 4th Century (Oxford: Lang 2018).
Taylor, C., Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1975).
Torrance, A., Human Perfection in Byzantine Theology. Attaining the Fullness of Christ (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020).
Usacheva, A., Knowledge, Language and Intellection from Origen to Gregory Nazianzen. A Selective Survey (Oxford: Lang 2017).
Vaggione, R.P., Eunomius of Cyzicus and the Nicene Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001).
Williams, R., “The Deflections of Desire: Negative Theology in Trinitarian Disclosure,” Silence and the Word Negative Theology and Incarnation (eds. O. Davies – D. Turner; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002) 115–135.
Woźniak, R.J., Primitas et plenitudo. Dios Padre en la teología trinitaria de San Buenaventura (Pamplona: Eunsa 2007).
Woźniak, R.J., Różnica i tajemnica. Objawienie jako teologiczne źródło ludzkiej sobości (Poznań: W drodze 2012).
Woźniak, R.J., “The Christological Prism: Christology as Methodological Principle,” Oxford Handbook of Christology (ed. F.A. Murphy; Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015) 519–530.
The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Kraków https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-1514
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author(s) grant (s) to the Licensee a non-exclusive and royalty-free license in accordance with the provisions of the Appendix: LICENSE TO USE THE WORK
