Methods of Dogmatic Discourse in the Dispute over the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary as Exemplified by German Dominican Theologians from the 13th to the 16th Century

Bogdan Ferdek

Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5787-0523


Abstract

The important problem of the publication is expressed by two questions: what method was used by German Dominican theologians who were supporters of the Immaculate Conception? How did the change in method change the view of the Immaculate Conception? The path to solving the problem has three stages. The first of them is a reconstruction of the views on the Immaculate Conception of German Dominican theologians. The next stage examines these views in terms of the method used. The final stage is a critical look at the methods used by Dominican supporters of the Immaculate Conception. The method used in the article consists of: systematization of the views of German Dominicans, analysis of the methods used by them and a discourse on the methods of the supporters of the Immaculate Conception with the opponent of this opinion, St. Thomas Aquinas. The change of method, from the scholastic method to the liturgical method (lex orandi – lex credendi), the argument from congruity (ex convenientia), and typological exegesis, has led a few Dominican theologians to the opinion that Mary was preserved or purified from original sin, or that she was conceived without original sin. The methods used by Dominican supporters of the Immaculate Conception have weaknesses. They resemble a circumstantial trial, which provides a high degree of probability, but not proof. This weakness of the methods is exposed by the discourse of these methods with the scholastic method of St. Thomas. This discourse results in the postulate of reinterpreting the Immaculate Conception. We should return to the biblical term “sanctification” and explain that Mary was saved by a more sublime sanctification. This would prevent the immaculate conception of Jesus from being equated with the immaculate conception of Mary. Only Jesus is Immaculate because He was conceived by the Holy Spirit, and His Mother, conceived by Joachim and Anna, was saved by a more sublime sanctification.

Keywords:

scholastic method, lectio divina, immaculate conception, sublime sanctification, heresy, reinterpretation



Albertus Magnus, In tertium sententiarum: Albertus Magnus. 1894. “Super III Sententiarum.” In Opera Omnia, by Albertus Magnus, edited by Auguste Borgnet, 28:46–48. Parisiis: Vivés.

Alexander VII. 2012. “Solicitudo omnium ecclesiarum.” In Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum, by Heinrich Denzinger. San Francisco: Ignatius.

Alva y Astorga, Pedro de. 1666. Radii solis. Lovanii: [s.n.]

Balić, Carlo. 1958. “The Mediaeval Controversy over the Immaculate Conception up to the Death of Scotus.” In The Dogma of the Immaculate Conception: History and Significance, edited by Edward D. O’Connor, 192–97. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Baron, Arkadiusz, and Henryk Pietras, eds. 2004. “De conceptione gloriosissime virginis Mariae.” In Konstancja, Bazylea – Ferrara – Florencja – Rzym (1414–1445), vol. 3 of Dokumenty Soborów Powszechnych: Tekst łaciński, grecki, arabski, ormiański, polski. Źródła Myśli Teologicznej 30. Kraków: WAM. (= CGVM).

Bartholomaeus de Bregantiis. 1993. “Sermones de Beata Virgine.” In I sermones de Beata Virgine (1266), by Bartolomeo da Breganze, edited by Laura Gaffuri. Padova: Antenore.

Bartnik, Czesław. 2020. “Metodologia teologii dogmatycznej.” [Methodology of Dogmatic Theology]. Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN, no. 2, 165–74. https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/snt/article/view/9556.

Benedykt XVI. 2011. Mistrzowie duchowi: Ojcowie i pisarze średniowiecza. [Masters of the Spirit: Fathers and Writers of the Middle Ages]. Poznań: W drodze.

Bernard z Clairvaux. 2015. “List do kanoników z Lyonu w sprawie Poczęcia Najświętszej Maryi Panny.” [Letter to the Canons of Lyons on the Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary]. In „Złota nić” Niepokalanego Poczęcia w myśli i w życiu bł. Jana Dunsa Szkota i św. Maksymiliana Marii Kolbego, [The “Golden Thread” of the Immaculate Conception in the Thought and Life of Blessed John Duns Scotus and St Maximilian Maria Kolbe], Bartosik, Grzegorz Maria and Warchoł, Paweł, 81–85. Teresin: Wydawnictwo Ojców Franciszkanów Niepokalanów.

Binnebesel, Bruno. 1934. “Die Stellung der Theologen des Dominikanerordens zur Frage nach der Unbefleckten Empfängnis Marias bis zum Konzil von Basel.” PhD diss., Schlesische FriedrichWilhelms-Universität zu Breslau.

Blažek, Pavel. 2014. “Due commenti di Johannes Streler, O.P. (†1459) alle Sentenze di Pietro Lombardo. Edizione dei prologhi e tabula quaestionum.” [Two Commentaries by Johannes Streler, O.P. (†1459) on the Sentences of Peter Lombard: An Edition of the Prologues and tabula quaestionum]. Angelicum 91 (4): 669–726. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26392477.

Bouman, Cornelius A. 1958. “The Immaculate Conception in the Liturgy.” In The Dogma of the Immaculate Conception: History and Significance, edited by Edward D. O’Connor, 113–60. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Council of Trent. 1546. Concerning Original Sin. http://www.thecounciloftrent.com/ch5.htm.

Council of Trent. 1547. On Justification. http://www.thecounciloftrent.com/ch6.htm.

Eckert, Willehard, and Elizabeth von Witzleben. 1989. “Dominikus.” In Marienlexikon, edited by Remigius Bäumer and Leo Scheffczyk, 2:210–12. St. Ottilien: EOS.

Fiedrowicz, Michael. 2009. Teologia ojców Kościoła. [Theology of the Fathers of the Church]. Translated by Wiesław Szymona. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Gay-Canton, Réjane. 2011. Entre dévotion et théologie scolastique: Réceptions de la controverse médiévale autour de l’Immaculée Conception en pays germaniques. Bibliothèque d’histoire culturelle du Moyen Age 11. Turnhout: Brepols.

The Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew. n.d. Accessed December 7, 2023. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0848.htm.

Herolt, Johannes. 1529. Sermones Discipuli, et de Te[m]pore [et] de Sanctis: Quadragesimale eiusde cu[m] promptuario: ac diuersis tabulis perq necessarijs; Cu[m] casibus papalibus ep libus: a sacra co munione inhibitionib nouissime Lugduni emendati oprimisq caracterib impressi.[s.l.]: [s.n.]

Herolt, Johannes. 1584. “Sermo V: De Conceptione B. Mariae Virginis.” In Sermones Discipuli, de tempore et de sanctis, 11. Venetiis: Apud haeredes Melchioris Sessae.

Horst, Ulrich. 1987. Die Diskussion um die Immaculata Conceptio im Dominikanerorden: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der theologischen Methode. Paderborn: Schöningh.

Horst, Ulrich. 2009. Dogma und Theologie: Dominikanertheologen in den Kontroversen um die Immaculata Conceptio. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Jordan z Saksonii. 2017. Najdroższej Dianie... [Dearest Diana...] 2nd ed. Translated by Paweł Krupa. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Prowincji Dominikanów W drodze.

Kaeppeli, Thomas. 1975. Scriptores Ordinis Praedicatorum Medii Aevi. Vol. 2. Romae: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.

Kochaniewicz, Bogusław. 2001a. “Maryja, łaski pełna w zbawczym planie Boga według Komentarza do Ave Maria św. Tomasza z Akwinu.” [Mary, Full of Grace in the Salvific Plan of God According to the Commentary on the Ave Maria of St. Thomas Aquinas]. Salvatoris Mater 3 (3): 168–86.

Kochaniewicz, Bogusław. 2001b. “Niepokalane poczęcie w średniowieczu.” [The Immaculate Conception in the Middle Ages]. Salvatoris Mater 3 (1): 349–61.

Kochaniewicz, Bogusław. 2004. “Średniowieczni dominikanie a niepokalane poczęcie Matki Bożej.” [Medieval Dominicans and the Immaculate Conception of the Mother of God]. Salvatoris Mater 6 (1): 199–230.

Kochaniewicz, Bogusław. 2008. Średniowieczni dominikanie o Matce Bożej. [The Medieval Dominicans about the Mother of God]. Kraków: Societas Vistulana.

Kochaniewicz, Bogusław. 2021. “Bernard z Clairvaux, Tomasz z Akwinu i uświęcenie Najświętszej Maryi Panny.” [Bernard of Clairvaux, Thomas Aquinas and the Sanctification of the Blessed Virgin Mary]. Studia Koszalińsko-Kołobrzeskie 28:159–76. https://doi.org/10.18276/skk.2021.2808.

Lamy, Marielle. 2000. L’Immaculée Conception: Étapes et enjeux d’une controverse au moyen-âge (XIIe–XVe siècles). Paris: Institut des Études Augustiniennes.

Lauchert, Friedrich. 1897. “Der Dominikaner Wigand Wirt und seine Streitigkeiten.” Historisches Jahrbuch 18:759–91.

Lauchert, Jakob. 1898. “Wirt, Wigand.” In Allgemeine deutsche Biographie, 43:522–25. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

Laurentin, René. 1958. “The Role of the Papal Magisterium in the Development of the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception.” In The Dogma of the Immaculate Conception: History and Significance, edited by Edward D. O’Connor, 271–324. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Löhr, Gabriel Maria. 1934. Die Dominikaner an der Leipziger Universität. Leipzig: Albertus-MagnusVerlag.

Lohrum, Meinolf. 1989. “Dominikaner.” In Marienlexikon, edited by Remigius Bäumer and Leo Scheffczyk, 2:207–8. St. Ottilien: EOS.

Lombard, Piotr [Peter Lombard]. 2015. Wstęp, księga III–IV. [Four Books of Sentences]. Vol. 2 of Cztery księgi sentencji, translated by Julian Wojtkowski. Olsztyn: Wojtkowski.

Master Eckhart. 2020. “Kazanie 93.” [Sermon 93]. In Kazania 87–117: [Sermons 87–117], vol. 4 of Mistrz Ekhart: Dzieła wszystkie, [Master Eckhart. Complete Works], edited by Ewa Kubiak, translated by Wiesław Szymona. Poznań: W drodze.

Mayberry, Nancy. 1991. “The Controversy over the Immaculate Conception in Medieval and Renaissance Art, Literature, and Society.” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 21 (2): 207–24.

Napiórkowski, Stanisław Celestyn. 2005. “Podstawy prawdy o niepokalanym poczęciu i podanie jej przez Kościół do wierzenia.” [Fundamentals of the Truth about the Immaculate Conception and the Way the Church Accepted this Belief]. In Niepokalane poczęcie i życie chrześcijańskie: Materiały z sympozjum mariologiczno-maryjnego, Niepokalanów, 15–17 października 2004 roku, [The Immaculate Conception and the Christian Life], edited by Danuta Mastalska, 19–22. Częstochowa: Polskie Towarzystwo Mariologiczne.

Nicolaus Mediolanensis. 1997. “Collationes de beata virgine.” In Collationes de Beata Virgine: A Cycle of Preaching in the Dominican Congregation of the Blessed Virgin Mary at Imola 1286–1287, by Fra Nicola da Milano, edited by M. Michèle Mulchahey. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

Powitz, Gerhardt. 1995. “Streler, Johannes OP.” In Die deutsche Literatur des Mittelalters – Verfasserlexikon, 9:411–16. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Protoevangelium of James. n.d. Accessed December 7, 2023. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0847.htm.

Ratzinger, Joseph. 2022. Pochodzenie i przeznaczenie. [Origin and Destiny]. Edited by Krzysztof Góźdź and Marzena Górecka. Translated by Joachim Kobienia. Opera Omnia 5. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Rusecki, Marian. 2010. “Problematyka metody w teologii.” [The Problem of Method in Theology]. In Tożsamość teologii, edited by Andrzej Anderwald, Tadeusz Dola, and Marian Rusecki, 43–83. Opole: Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.

Schenk, Richard. 1991. “Herolt, Johannes, OP.” In Marienlexikon, edited by Remigius Bäumer and Leo Scheffczyk, 3:157–59. St. Ottilien: EOS.

Schiewer, Hans-Jochen. 1991. “Johannes Nider.” In Marienlexikon, edited by Remigius Bäumer and Leo Scheffczyk, 3:410. St. Ottilien: EOS.

Sebastian, Wenceslaus. 1958. “The Controversy over the Immaculate Conception from after Scotus to the End of the Eighteenth Century.” In The Dogma of the Immaculate Conception: History and Significance, edited by Edward D. O’Connor, 213–70. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Second Vatican Council. 1964. Dogmatic Constitution on the Church Lumen Gentium. (= LG) https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html.

Segl, Peter. 2016. “Deutsche Dominikaner im Kampf gegen Dämonen, Ketzer und Hexen.” In Die deutschen Dominikaner und Dominikanerinnen im Mittelalter, edited by Sabine von Heusinger, Elias H. Füllenbach, Walter Senner, and Klaus-Bernward Springer, 499–530. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110482386–028.

Sesboüé, Bernard, and Christoph Théobald. 2003. Słowo zbawienia. [The Word of Salvation]. Edited by Tadeusz Dzidek. Translated by Piotr Rak. Historia Dogmatów 4. Kraków: Wydawnictwo M.

Siebert, Hermann. 1906. “Die Heiligenpredigt des ausgehenden Mittelalters.” Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie 30 (3): 470–91.

Sixtus IV. 2012. Cum praeexcelsa. San Francisco: Ignatius. English translation: The Immaculate Conception I – Cum Praeexcelsa. https://catholicheritage.blogspot.com/2010/12/immaculate-conception-i-cum-praeexcelsa.html.

Sixtus IV. n.d. The Immaculate Conception I – Cum Praeexcelsa. https://catholicheritage.blogspot.com/2010/12/immaculate-conception-i-cum-praeexcelsa.html.

Steitz, Georg Eduard. 1877. “Der Streit über die unbefleckte Empfängnis der Maria zu Frankfurt a. M. im Jahre 1500 und sein Nachspiel in Bern 1509.” Archiv für Frankfurts Geschichte und Kunst: NS 6:1–35.

Streler, Johannes. 1924. Informationes. cod. E.III.13, 47. Basel, Universitätsbibliothek: Löhr.

Strozzi, Thomas. 1700. Controversia dell‘immacolata concezione. Palermo: [s.n.]

Suzo, Henryk. 2016. Księga Mądrości Przedwiecznej. [The Book of Eternal Wisdom]. 2nd ed. Translated by Wiesław Szymona. Poznań: W drodze.

Tauler, Jan. 2016. “Kazanie 55.” [Sermon 55]. In Kazania, [Sermons], 2nd ed., translated by Wiesław Szymona, vol. 2. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Prowincji Dominikanów W drodze.

Download

Published
2024-09-30


Ferdek, B. (2024). Methods of Dogmatic Discourse in the Dispute over the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary as Exemplified by German Dominican Theologians from the 13th to the 16th Century. Verbum Vitae, 42(3), 557–582. https://doi.org/10.31743/vv.17404

Bogdan Ferdek  bferdek@pwt.wroc.pl
Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5787-0523



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The author(s) grant (s) to the Licensee a non-exclusive and royalty-free license in accordance with the provisions of the Appendix: LICENSE TO USE THE WORK