COMMENTARY ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S JUDGMENT OF 27 NOVEMBER 2012 (FILE ACT NO. U 4/12)

Konrad Walczuk





Abstract

In its judgment of 27 November 2012 (File Act no. U 4/12) The Constitutional Court has rightly concluded with reference to the so-called ritual slaughter that § 8. 2 Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development dated 9 September 2004 concerning the qualifications of persons entitled to the professional slaughter, and the conditions and methods of slaughter and killing of animals is incompatible with Art. 34 paragraph 1 and 6 of the Act of 21 August 1997 about Protection of animals, and by this Article 92 paragraph 1 of the polish Constitution. It should be emphasized that the judgment of the Court concerned essentially only formal issues beyond its scope, leaving the matter of the relationship between particular freedoms and rights (mainly human and civil), which imamy dealing with ritual slaughter. It is expected that these issues also will be subject to the substantive activities of the Constitutional Court.

Keywords:

ritual slaughter, sources of law, religious freedom, animal rights, the Constitutional Court

Bibliografia znajduje się w przypisach dolnych głównego tekstu.

Published
2020-11-30


Walczuk, K. (2020). GLOSA DO WYROKU TRYBUNAŁU KONSTYTUCYJNEGO Z DNIA 27 LISTOPADA 2012 ROKU (SYGN. AKT U 4/12). Zeszyty Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II, 57(2), 47–58. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/znkul/article/view/11494

Konrad Walczuk 



License

This is an open access journal.

Beginning with Issue 1/2024, all texts published under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence

The texts in Issues from 3/2018 to 4/2023 are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence

For aricles till 2/2018 your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation – see: Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych.