Magic in Sermons by Caesarius of Arles
Abstract
Caesarius of Arles was one of the most prominent figures of his time. He sought to influence the behaviour of his subordinate community through impassioned and deeply thoughtful sermons. Various types of magical practices were among the issues addressed in them. Among other things, he condemned: divination by examining the entrails of animals (haruspicia), divination by examining the behaviour of birds (auguria) or astrology, as well as the use of conjurers, sorcerers, fortune-tellers and soothsayers. According to the Bishop of Arles, all forms of magical activities shared one characteristic – a link to the activity of the devil. The focus of this article is the magical practices that were considered harmful in Sermons by the Gallic preacher. The author employs historical, comparative and philological methods.
Keywords:
Caesarius of Arles, magic, magicians, fortune-tellers, magical practicesReferences
Burczak K., Sacrilegium w „Dekrecie” Gracjana, Lublin 2010.
Dębiński A., Polityka ustawodawcza rzymskich cesarzy chrześcijańskich w sprawach religijnych, Lublin 2020.
Dickie M.W., Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World, London–New York 2005.
Dunn G.D., Rhetoric in the Patristic Sermons of Late Antiquity, w: Preaching in the Patristic Era: Sermons, Preachers, and Audiences in the Latin West, red. A. Dupont, Sh. Boodts, G. Partoens, J. Leemans, Leiden–Boston 2018. (Crossref)
Gaddis M., There Is No Crime for Those Who Have Christ. Religious Violence in the Christian Roman Empire, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London 2005. (Crossref)
Hemperek P., Reforma święceń niższych i subdiakonatu, Prawo Kanoniczne 1973, t. 16, nr 3–4, DOI: 10.21697/pk.1973.16.3-4.09. (Crossref)
Hemperek P., Góralski W., Przytuła F., Bakalarz J., Komentarz do Kodeksu Prawa Kanonicznego z 1983 r., t. 3, ks. III. Nauczycielskie zadanie Kościoła, ks. IV. Uświęcające zadanie Kościoła, Lublin 1986.
Jońca M., Głośne rzymskie procesy karne, Wrocław 2009.
Jońca M., Laudatio Turiae – funeberis oratio uxori dedicata. Pochwała Turii – mowa pogrzebowa ku czci żony, Poznań 2011.
Jońca M., Parricidium w prawie rzymskim, Lublin 2008.
Jońca M., Prawo rzymskie. Mirabilia, Warszawa 2020.
Jońca M., Rzymskie prawo karne. Instytucje, Lublin 2021.
Jońca M., s.v. venenum, w: Leksykon rzymskiego prawa karnego. Podstawowe pojęcia, red. M. Jońca, Warszawa 2022.
Klingshirn W.E., Caesarius of Arles: The Making of a Christian Community in Late Antique Gaul, Cambridge 2004.
Klingshirn W., Charity and Power: Caesarius of Arles and the Ransoming of Captives in Sub-Roman Gaul, The Journal of Roman Studies 1985, t. 75, DOI: 10.2307/300659. (Crossref)
Krukowski J., s.v. Święcenia, Sakrament święceń, w: Leksykon prawa kanonicznego, red. M. Sitarz, Lublin 2019.
De Maeyer N., Partoens G., Preaching in Sixth-Century Arles. The Sermons of Bishop Caesarius, w: Preaching in the Patristic Era: Sermons, Preachers, and Audiences in the Latin West, red. A. Dupont, Sh. Boodts, G. Partoens, J. Leemans, Leiden–Boston 2018. (Crossref)
Marasco G., L’accusa di magia e i cristiani nella tarda antichità, Augustinianum 2011, t. 51, nr 2, DOI: 10.5840/agstm201151217. (Crossref)
Pochwat J., Dzień Pański w nauczaniu św. Cezarego z Arles w świetle studium jego „Kazań do ludu”, Vox Patrum 2013, t. 60, DOI: 10.31743/vp.3990. (Crossref)
Pochwat J., Sprawiedliwość i miłosierdzie. Studium Kazań do ludu św. Cezarego z Arles, Kraków 2008.
Pochwat J., Wstęp, w: Św. Cezary z Arles. Kazania do ludu (1–80), przeł. S. Ryznar (kaz. 1–55), J. Pochwat (kaz. 56–80), Kraków 2011.
Wygralak P., Stanowisko Kościoła wobec idolatrii i magii na terenach Galii i Hiszpanii w późnej starożytności chrześcijańskiej (VI–VII w.), Poznań 2011.
Wygralak P., Stanowisko Ojców Kościoła wobec magii, w: Wczesne chrześcijaństwo a religie, red. I.S. Ledwoń, M. Szram, Lublin 2012.
Wygralak P., Zło magii w pastoralnych wskazaniach Ojców Kościoła, Vox Patrum 2013, t. 59, DOI: 10.31743/vp.4032. (Crossref)
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Author declares that the Work is original and does not infringe any personal or proprietary rights of third parties, and that She/He has unlimited rights to the Work which are the subject of the Agreement signed with the Publisher.
Author of the publication transfers to the Publisher the economic copyrights to the Work (article) submitted for publication, free of charge, without time and territorial restrictions in the following fields of use:
a) production, recording and reproduction of the copies of the Work by a specific technique, including printing, magnetic recording and digital technology;
b) marketing, lending or rental of the original or copies of the Work, and distribution in the form of open access, in accordance with the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (also known as CC BY), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.pl;
c) inclusing the Work in the composition of the collective work;
d) publishing on the website of the journal, public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and rebroadcasting, and making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to them in a place and at a time chosen by them;
e) uploading the Work in an electronic form to electronic platforms or other uploading of the Work in an electronic form to the Internet or other network.
The proprietary copyright to the Work is transferred to the Publisher free of charge upon signing the contract wit the Publisher.
