The Tradition of the 364-Day Calendar versus the Calendar Polemic in Second Temple Judaism


Abstract

The article presents the major hypotheses concerning the emergence of the 364-day calendar within Judaism and the related calendrical controversy, which presumably caused the separation of a certain group of Jews, known to us as the Qumran Community, from the temple cult in Jerusalem. It is not known whether the 364-day calendar tradition is older than that of the Astronomical Book, or whether the adoption of this tradition was accompanied by conflicts. The Qumran texts do not provide unequivocal evidence for any calendrical polemics. The only witness to these polemics is The Book of Jubilees, copies of which were found in the Qumran library. However, the Qumran Community itself did not share the radical line of The Book of Jubilees, which condemns reliance on the moon in time-keeping. The 364-day calendar is presumed to have been a distinctive feature of the Qumran Community, which however did not arouse any controversies within Second Temple Judaism.


Keywords

calendar; 364-day; polemics; Qumran

Abegg, M.G., “The Calendar at Qumran,” Judaism in Late Antiquity. V. The Judaism of Qumran. A Systematic Reading of the Dead Sea Scrolls. 1. Theory of Israel (ed. A.J. Avery-Peck) (Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 1. The Near and Middle East 56; Leiden: Brill 2001) 154–171.
Albani, M., Astronomie und Schöpfungsglaube. Untersuchungen zum astronomischen Henochbuch (Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 68; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener 1994).
Albani, M., “Der Zodiakos in 4Q318 und die Henoch-Astronomie,” Mitteilungen und Beiträge. Forschungsstelle Judentum 7 (1993) 3–42.
Avigad, N., “Epigraphical Gleaning from Gezer,” Palestine Exploration Quarterly 82 (1950) 43–49.
Baumgarten, J.M., “4Q503 (Daily Prayers) and the Lunar Calendar,” Revue de Qumrân 12/3 (1986) 399–407.
Baumgarten, J.M., “The Calendar of the Book of Jubilees and the Bible,” Tarbiz 32 (1962) 317–328 (= Studies in Qumran Law [Leiden: Brill 1997] 101–114).
Beckwith, R.T., Calendar and Chronology, Jewish and Christian. Biblical, Intertestamental and Patristic Studies (Arbeiten zur Geschichte des antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums 33; Leiden: Brill 1996).
Beckwith, R.T., “The Essene Calendar and the Moon: A Reconsideration,” Revue de Qumrân 15 (1992) 457–466.
Beckwith, R.T., “The Modern Attempt to Reconcile the Qumran Calendar with the True Solar Year,” Revue de Qumrân 7 ( 1970 ) 379–396.
Beckwith, R.T., “The Significance of the 364-Day Calendar for the Old Testament Canon,” Calendar, Chronology and Worship (ed. R.T. Beckwith) (Leiden: Brill 2005) 54–66.
Ben-Dov, J., “The 364-Day Year in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Jewish Pseudepigrapha,” Calendars and Years II. Astronomy and Time in the Ancient and Medieval World (ed. J.M. Steele) (Oxford: Oxbow 2011) 69–106.
Ben-Dov, J., Head of All Years. Astronomy and Calendars at Qumran in Their Ancient Context (Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 78; Brill: Leiden 2008).
Ben-Dov, J., “Lunar Calendars at Qumran?: A Comparative and Ideological Study,” Living the Lunar Calendar (eds. J. Ben-Dov –W. Horowitz – J.M. Steele) (Oxford: Oxbow 2012) 173–189.
Ben-Dov, J. – Horowitz, W., “The Babylonian Lunar Three in Calendrical Scrolls from Qumran,” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 95 (2005) 104–120.
Bernstein, M.J., “‘Walking in the Festivals of the Gentiles’: 4QpHoseaa 2.15-17 and Jubilees 6:34-38,” Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 9 (1991) 21–34.
Branch-Trevathan, G., “Why Does 4Q394 Begin with a Calendar?,” The Dead Sea Scrolls in Context. Integrating the Dead Sea Scrolls in the Study of Ancient Texts, Languages and Cultures (Vetus Testamentum Supplements 140; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2011) 923–933.
Burrows, M. – Trever, J.C. – Brownlee, W.H. (eds.) The Dead Sea Scrolls of St. Mark's Monastery. I. The Isaiah Manuscript and the Habakkuk Commentary. II.2. Plates and Transcription of the Manual of Discipline (New Haven, CT: American Schools of Oriental Research 1950, 1951).
Callaway, P.R., “The 364-Day Calendar Traditions at Qumran,” Mogilany 1989. Papers on the Dead Sea Scrolls Offered in Memory of Jean Carmignac. I. General Research on the Dead Sea Scrolls, Qumran and the New Testament. The Present State of Qumranology (ed. Z.J. Kapera) (Kraków: Enigma 1993) 19–28.
Callaway, P.R., “4QMMT and Recent Hypotheses on the Origin of the Qumran Community,” Mogilany 1993. Papers on the Dead Sea Scrolls Offered in Memory of Hans Burgmann (ed. Z.J. Kapera) (Kraków: Enigma 1993) 15–29.
Chyutin, M., “The Controversy of the Calendars in Miqsat Maʿaseh ha-Torah – 4QMMT,” Beit Mikra 44/3 (1999) 209–214.
Cryer, F.H., “The 360-Day Calendar Year and Early Judaic Sectarian,” Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 1 (1987) 116–122.
Davies, P.R., “Calendrical Change and Qumran Origins: An Assessment of VanderKam’s Theory,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 45 (1983) 80–89.
Drawnel, H., The Aramaic Astronomical Book (4Q208–4Q211) from Qumran. Text, Translation, and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011).
Drawnel, H., “Moon Computation in the Aramaic Astronomical Book,” Revue de Qumrân 23 (2007) 3–41.
Elior, R., The Three Temples. On the Emergence of Jewish Mysticism (trans. D. Louvish) (Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization 2004).
Eshel, H., “4Q390, the 490-Year Prophecy, and the Calendrical History of the Second Temple Period,” Enoch and Qumran Origins. New Light on a Forgotten Connection (ed. G. Boccaccini) (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2005) 102-110.
Feldman, R.H., “The 364-Day ‘Qumran’ Calendar and the Biblical Seventh–Day Sabbath: A Hypothesis Suggesting Their Simultaneous Institutionalization by Nehemiah,” Henoch 31/2 (2009) 342-365.
Fraade, S.D., “Theory, Practice, and Polemic in Ancient Jewish Calendars,” Diné Israel 26–27 (2009–2010) 147–181.
Fraade, S.D., “To Whom It May Concern: 4QMMT and Its Addressee(s),” Revue de Qumrân 19 (2000) 507–526.
García Martínez, F., “Dos notas sobre 4QMMT,” Revue de Qumrân 16 (1993) 293–297.
Glessmer, U., “Calendars in the Qumran Scrolls,” The Dead Sea Scrolls After Fifty Years. A Comprehensive Assessment (eds. P. Flint – J.C. VanderKam) (Leiden: Brill 1999) II, 213–278.
Glessmer, U., “Horizontal Measuring in the Babylonian Astronomical Compendium MUL.APIN and in the Astronomical Book of 1 Enoch,” Henoch 18 (1996) 259–282.
Glessmer, U., “The Otot-Texts (4Q319) and the Problem of Intercalations in the Context of the 364-Day Calendar,” Qumranstudien. Vorträge und Beiträge der Teilnehmer des Qumranseminars auf dem internationalen Treffen der Society of Biblical Literature, Münster, 25.-26. Juli 1993 (eds. H.-J. Fabry – A. Lange – H. Lichtenberger) (Schriften des Institutum Judaicum Delitzschianum 4; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1996) 125–164.
Greenfield, J.C. – Sokoloff, M., “An Astrological Text from Qumran (4Q318) and Reflections on Some Zodiacal Names,” Revue de Qumrân 16 (1995) 507–525.
Gropp, D.M., “The Samaria Papyri from Wadi Daliyeh,” Wadi Daliyeh II and Qumran Cave 4. XXVIII (eds. D.M. Gropp – J.C. VanderKam – M. Brady) (Discoveries in the Judaean Desert 28; Oxford: Clarendon 2001) 3–116.
Horowitz, W., “The 360 and 364 Day Year in Ancient Mesopotamia,” Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Studies 24 (1996) 35–44.
Horowitz, W., “The 364 Day Year in Mesopotamia Again,” Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 49 (1998) 49–51.
Hunger, H. – Pingree, D., Mul.Apin. An astronomical Compendium in Cuneiform (Archiv für Orientforschung 24; Horn: Berger 1989).
Jacobus, H.R., “Calendars in the Qumran Collection,” The Dead Sea Scrolls at Qumran and the Concept of a Library (eds. S.W. Crawford – C. Wassen) (Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 116; Leiden: Brill 2015) 217–243.
Jacobus, H.R., Zodiac Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Their Reception. Ancient Astronomy and Astrology in Early Judaism (IJS Studies in Judaica 14; Leiden – Boston, MA: Brill 2014).
Jaubert, A., “Le Calendrier des Jubilés et de la Secte de Qumrân: Ses origines bibliques,” Vetus Testamentum 3 (1953) 250–264.
Jaubert, A., The Date of the Last Supper (trans. I. Rafferty) (Staten Island, NY: Alba 1965).
Klukowski, M., “Tradycja roku 364-dniowego w judaizmie okresu Drugiej Świątyni,” Verbum Vitae 35 (2019) 145–164.
Koch, J., “AO 6478, MUL.APIN und das 364 Tage Jahr,” Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 111 (1996) 97–99.
Koch, J., “Ein für allemal: Das antike Mesopotamien kannte kein 364 Tage-Jahr,” Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 12 (1998) 112–114.
Koch, J., “Kannte man in Mesopotamien das 364 Tage-Jahr wirklich seit dem 7. Jahrhundert v. Chr?,” Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 119 (1997) 109–112.
Kutsch, E., “Der Kalender des Jubiläenbuches und das Alte und das Neue Testament,” Vetus Testamentum 11 (1961) 39–47.
Milik, J.T., The Books of Enoch. Aramaic Fragments of Qumrân Cave 4 (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1976).
Milik, J.T., Ten Years of Discovery in the Wilderness of Judaea (Studies in Biblical Theology 26; Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock 2009).
Murphy-O'Connor, J., “Demetrius I and the Teacher of Righteousness,” Revue Biblique 83 (1976) 400–420.
Murphy-O'Connor, J., “The Essenes and Their History,” Revue Biblique 81 (1974) 215–244.
Newsom, C.A., The Dead Sea Scrolls. Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Texts with English Translations. Angelic Liturgy. Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice (eds. J.H. Charlesworth et al.) (The Princeton Theological Seminary Dead Sea Scrolls Project 4B; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck – Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox 1999).
Newsom, C.A., “‘Sectually Explicit’ Literature from Qumran,” The Hebrew Bible and Its Interpreters (eds. W. H. Propp – B. Halpern – D.N. Freedman) (Biblical and Judaic Studies from the University of California, San Diego 1; Winona Lake, IN; Eisenbrauns 1990) 167–187.
Nickelsburg, G.W.E. – VanderKam, J.C., 1 Enoch 2. A Commentary on the Book of 1 Enoch. Chapters 37–82 (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2012).
Nodet, É., “On the Biblical »Hidden« Calendar,” Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 124 (2012) 583–597.
Olson, D.C., “1 Enoch,” Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible (eds. J.D.G. Dunn – J.W. Rogerson) (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2003) 904–941.
Porten, B., “The Calendar of Aramaic Texts from Achaemenid and Ptolemaic Egypt,” Irano-Judaica. II. Studies Relating to Jewish Contacts with Persian Culture Throughout the Ages (eds. S. Shaked – A. Netzer) (Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute 1990) 13–32.
Porten, B. – Yardeni, A. (eds.), Textbook of Aramaic Documents from Ancient Egypt (Jerusalem: Hebrew University 1989) II.
Qimron, E. – Strugnell, J., Qumran Cave 4. V. Miqṣat Maʿaśe ha-Torah (Discoveries in the Judaean Desert 10; Clarendon: Oxford 1994).
Schiffman, L.H., The Halakhah at Qumran (Studies in Judaism in Late Antiquity 16; Leiden: Brill 1975).
Schiffman, L.H., “The Place of 4QMMT in the Corpus of Qumran Manuscripts,” Reading 4QMMT. New Perspectives on Qumran Law and History (eds. J. Kampen – M. Bernstein) (Society of Biblical Literature Symposium Series 2; Atlanta, GA: Scholar Press 1997) 81–98.
Schremer, A., “The Name of the Boethusians: A Reconsideration of Suggested Explanations and Another One,” Journal of Jewish Studies 48 (1997) 290–299.
Stegemann, H., The Library of Qumran. On the Essenes, Qumran, John the Baptist and Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1998).
Stern, S., “The Babylonian Calendar at Elephantine,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 130 (2000) 159–171.
Stern, S., Calendar and Community. A History of the Jewish Calendar Second Century BCE–Tenth Century CE (Oxford: Oxford University 2001).
Stern, S., Calendars in Antiquity. Empires, States, and Societies (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).
Stern, S., “Qumran Calendars and Sectarianism,” The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls (eds. T.H. Lim – J.J. Collins) (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010) 232–253.
Stern, S., “The ‘Sectarian’ Calendar of Qumran,” Sects and Sectarianism in Jewish History (ed. S. Stern) (Leiden: Brill 2011) 39–62.
Strugnell, J., “Appendix 3. Additional Observations on 4QMMT,” E. Qimron – J. Strugnell, Qumran Cave 4.V. Miqsat Maʿaśe ha-Torah (Discoveries in the Judaean Desert 10; Oxford: Clarendon 1994) 203–206.
Strugnell, J., “MMT: Second Thoughts on a Forthcoming Edition,” The Community of the Renewed Covenant. The Notre Dame Symposium on the Dead Sea Scrolls (eds. E. Urlich – J.C. VanderKam) (Christianity and Judaism in Antiquity 10; Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame 1994) 57–73.
Sussman, Y., “The History of Halakha and the Dead Sea Scrolls: Preliminary Observations on Miqsat Maʿase Ha-Torah (4QMMT),” E. Qimron – J. Strugnell, Qumran Cave 4. V. Miqṣat Maʿaśe ha-Torah (Discoveries in the Judaean Desert 10; Oxford: Clarendon 1994) 179–200.
Talmon, S., “Anti-Lunar-Calendar Polemic in the Covenanters’ Writings,” Das Ende der Tage und die Gegenwart des Heils. Begegnungen mit dem Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt. Festschrift für Heinz-Wolfgang Kuhn zum 65. Geburtstag (eds. M. Becker – W. Fenske) (Arbeiten zur Geschichte des antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums 44; Brill: Leiden 1999) 29–40.
Talmon, S., “Calendar Controversy in Ancient Judaism: The Case of the ‘Community of the Renewed Covenant,’” The Provo International Conference on the Dead Sea Scrolls. Technological Innovations, New Texts, and Reformulated Issues (eds. D. W. Parry – E. Ulrich) (Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 30; Leiden: Brill 1999) 379–395.
Talmon, S., “The Calendar Reckoning of the Sect from the Judean Desert,” Aspects of the Dead Sea Scrolls (eds. C. Rabin – Y. Yadin) (Scripta Hierosolymitana 4; Jerusalem: Magnes 1958) 162–199.
Talmon, S., “Calendars and Mishmarot,” Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls (eds. L.H. Schiffman – J.C. VanderKam) (New York: Oxford University 2000) I, 108–117.
Talmon, S., “The New Hebrew Letter from the Seventh Century B.C.E. in Historical Perspective,” King, Cult and Calendar in Ancient Israel (ed. S. Talmon) (Jerusalem: Magnes 1986) 89–112.
Talmon, S., “Qumran Studies: Past, Present and Future,” Jewish Quarterly Review 85 (1994) 1–31.
Talmon, S., “Yom Hakkippurim in the Habakkuk Scroll,” Biblica 32 (1951) 549–563.
Talmon, S. – Ben-Dov, J. – Glessmer, U., Qumran Cave 4. XVI. Calendrical Texts (Discoveries in the Judaean Desert 21; Clarendon: Oxford 2001).
VanderKam, J.C., “2 Maccabees 6–7a and Calendrical Change in Jerusalem,” Journal for the Study of Judaism 12 (1981) 52–74 (= From Revelation to Canon. Studies in the Hebrew Bible and Second Temple Literature [Journal for the Study of Judaism Supplements 62; Leiden: Brill 2000] 105–127).
VanderKam, J.C., The Book of Jubilees (Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium 511. Scriptores Aethiopici 88; Louvain: Peeters 1989).
VanderKam, J.C., “The Calendar, 4Q327, and 4Q394”, Legal Texts and Legal Issues. Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies, Cambridge 1995. Published in Honour of Joseph M. Baumgarten (eds. J. Kampen – M. Bernstein – F. García Martínez) (Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 23; Leiden: Brill 1997) 179–194.
VanderKam, J.C., Calendars in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Measuring Time (New York: Taylor & Francis eLibrary 2005).
VanderKam, J.C., “The Origin, Character and Early History of the 364-Day Calendar,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 41 (1979) 390–411.
VanderKam, J.C., Textual and Historical Studies in the Book of Jubilees (Harvard Semitic Monographs 14; Missoula, MT: Scholars Press for Harvard Semitic Studies 1977).
VanderKam, J.C. – Milik, J.T., “Jubilees,” Qumran Cave 4. VIII. Parabiblical Texts. I (ed. J.C. VanderKam) (Discoveries in the Judaean Desert 13; Oxford: Clarendon 1994) 1–140.
Vermes, G., The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English, 7 ed. (London: Penguin 2012).
Wacholder, B.Z., “Calendar Wars Between the 364 and the 365 Day Year,” Revue de Qumrân 20 (2001) 207–222.
Wacholder, B.Z. — Wacholder S., “Patterns of Biblical Dates and Qumran's Calendar: The Fallacy of Jaubert’s Hypothesis,” Hebrew Union College Annual 66 (1995) 1–40.
von Weissenberg, H., 4QMMT. Reevaluating the Text, the Function, and the Meaning of the Epilogue (Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 82; Leiden: Brill 2009).
Wise, M.O., “The Teacher of Righteousness and the High Priest of the Intersacerdotium: Two Approaches,” Revue de Qumrân 14 (1990) 587–613.
Wise, M.O., “Thunder in Gemini: An Aramaic Brontologion (4Q318) from Qumran,” Thunder in Gemini And Other Essays on the History, Language and Literature of Second Temple Palestine (Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha Supplement Series15; Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 1994) 13–50.
Download

Published : 2020-12-21


Klukowski, M. (2020). The Tradition of the 364-Day Calendar versus the Calendar Polemic in Second Temple Judaism. Verbum Vitae, 38(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.31743/vv.4831

Michał Jarosław Klukowski  michael.klukowski@yahoo.com
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II  Poland
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1130-7406

Michał Klukowski, a graduate of the Faculty of Theology of Opole University, from which he received S.T.M.; since 2013, a doctoral student at the Institute of Biblical Studies of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin. In 2018, he received a Licentiate in Theology: Biblical Studies (S.T.L.). On 21 September 2020, he defended his doctoral dissertation (S.T.D. & Ph.D.) entitled 4QMMT – „Niektóre Uczynki Prawa”. Rekonstrukcja tekstu – tłumaczenie – komentarz.






Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

(1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC license Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 

(2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

(3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).