The Question of Public Participation in the Procedure for Authentic Interpretation of Laws
Gordan Struić
University Specialist in Comparative Politics, and PhD Candidate at the Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb , Croatiahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6528-4436
Abstract
Authentic interpretation of laws is an interpretation of legal provisions that, due to their lack of clarity or misinterpretation in their application, is provided by the parliament. Unlike the legislative procedure, which is conducted, as a rule, in two (exceptionally three) readings, a proposal for giving an authentic interpretation is discussed in one reading. Starting from the understandings of some authors that the act of authentic interpretation of laws is contrary to the principle of democratic pluralism, and that it lacks the necessary level of democratic control and citizen participation, the author examines whether the Croatian parliamentary law enables public participation in the procedure for authentic interpretation of laws and, if so, what legal instruments can be used to implement it in parliamentary practice. To this end, the paper analyzes several relevant constitutional, legal, and procedural provisions of the Croatian parliamentary law, with reference to a parliamentary practice. Given the fact that the procedure for authentic interpretation in the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of Northern Macedonia, the Republic of Slovenia and the Republic of Serbia is regulated in a similar way by the rules of procedure of their respective parliaments, the relevant regulations of the latter three countries on the possibility of public participation in this procedure are analyzed as well. It was concluded that Croatian parliamentary law enables public participation in the procedure for authentic interpretation, through the instruments of petition, information and involvement in working groups and working bodies, and the same instruments, with certain specifics, are recognized in the parliamentary law of the latter three countries.
Keywords:
authentic interpretation, parliament, public participation, legislative procedureReferences
Bačić, Arsen. “Konstitucionalizam i parlamentarno pravo.” Vladavina prava 3, no. 6 (1999): 129–155.
Freie, John F. “Participatory democracy.” In Encyclopedia of community: from the village to the virtual world, Volume 1, edited by David Levinson, and Karen Christensen, 162. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003.
Giunio, Miljenko. “Ustavnost i vjerodostojnost autentičnog tumačenja zakona u hrvatskoj praksi.” Pravo u gospodarstvu 44, no. 5 (2005): 3–34.
Maldini, Pero. Demokracija i demokratizacija. Dubrovnik: Sveučilište u Dubrovniku, 2008.
Maldini, Pero. “Postkomunizam i postdemokracija: kriza demokracije i mjerila demokratičnosti.” In Demokracija i postdemokracija, edited by Anđelko Milardović, and Nikolina Jožanc, 209–239. Zagreb: Pan liber i Institut za europske i globalizacijske studije, 2013.
Malsch, Marijke. Democracy in the courts: lay participation in European criminal justice systems. Ashgate: Surrey, 2009.
Michels, Ank M. B. “Citizen participation and democracy in the Netherlands.” Democratization 13, no. 2 (2006): 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340500524067.
Pateman, Carole. “Participatory democracy revisited.” Perspectives on politics 10, no. 1 (2012): 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592711004877.
Phillips, Anne. (O)rađanje demokracije. Zagreb: Ženska infoteka, 2001.
Posavec, Zvonko. “Javnost i demokracija.” Politička misao 41, no. 1 (2004): 5–10.
Rodin, Siniša. “Demokratsko-pluralistička kritika instituta tzv. vjerodostojnog tumačenja.” Informator 53, no. 5337-5338 (2005): 1–4.
Struić, Gordan. “Vjerodostojno tumačenje zakona u hrvatskom parlamentarnom pravu od 1947. do danas.” Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava 16, no. 3 (2016): 553–585. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.16.3.3.
Struić, Gordan. “Postupak za autentično (vjerodostojno) tumačenje zakona u hrvatskom, makedonskom, slovenskom i srbijanskom parlamentarnom pravu i praksi.” Pravni vjesnik 32, no. 3-4 (2016): 133–156.
Struić, Gordan. “Uloga i način uređenja javnosti u hrvatskom parlamentarnom pravu od 1947. do 1953.” Pravni vjesnik 33, no. 2 (2017): 101–122. https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/5111.
Struić, Gordan. “Pitanje totalitarne naravi autentične interpretacije zakona kao relikta prošlosti.” In Identiteti – kulture – jezici, Godišnjak Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Mostaru: Nasljeđa totalitarizama u suvremenom društvu, edited by Dražen Barbarić, Miljenko Brekalo, Mate Buntić, Karsten Dümmel, Gordana Iličić, Miro Jakovljević, Katica Krešić, Ivica Musić, Marko Odak, Jelena Sabljić-Vujica, and Ugo Vlaisavljević, 55–68. Mostar: Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Mostaru, 2018.
Struić, Gordan, and Bratić Vjekoslav. “Sudjelovanje javnosti u zakonodavnom postupku: primjer Odbora za financije i državni proračun Hrvatskoga sabora.” Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava 17, no. 1 (2017): 131–152.
Struić, Gordan, and Bratić Vjekoslav. “Public participation in the budgetary process in the Republic of Croatia.” Public Sector Economics 42, no. 1 (2018): 67–92.
Vuković, Mihajlo, and Vuković Đuro. Znanost o izradi pravnih propisa: nomotehnika. Zagreb: Informator, 1997.
University Specialist in Comparative Politics, and PhD Candidate at the Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb
Gordan Struić, M.A., University Specialist in Comparative Politics, and PhD Candidate at the Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb, Republic of Croatia; Advisor in the Office of the President of the Croatian Parliament (Speaker’s Office); correspondence address: Trg. sv. Marka 6, 10000 Zagreb, Republic of Croatia; e-mail: gordan.struic@gmail.com; http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6528-4436.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6528-4436
