The Right to be Forgotten: Emerging Legal Issues
Oksana Vasylivna KiriiakYuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University , Ukraina
This paper contextualizes and analyzes the main emerging approaches to the understanding of the right to be forgotten and its application in praxis, using legislation and judicial practice of the European Union and Ukraine as reference scales. By bridging the gap between positive and interpretative orders of law implementation, which were previously imperatively opposed and considered mutually exclusive in the Ukrainian legal system, the paper supports the arguments that the process of mastering the protection of right to be forgotten requires a further mindset shift equally for-Internet providers and all involved law enforcers.
Słowa kluczowe:right to be forgotten, right to remember, court jurisdiction, trials, human rights and freedoms
Adams Shoor, Emily. “Narrowing the Right to Be Forgotten: Why the European Union Needs to Amend the Proposed Data Protection Regulation.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 39 (2014): 487–521.
Daskal, Jennifer. “Google, Inc v. Equustek Solutions.” American Journal of International Law 112, Issue 4 (2018): 727–733.
Erdos, David. “The right to be forgotten’ beyond the EU: an analysis of wider G20 regulatory action and potential next steps.” Journal of Media Law 13 (2021): 18–30.
Fabbrini, Federico, and Edoardo Celeste. “The Right to Be Forgotten in the Digital Age: The Challenges of Data Protection Beyond Borders.” German Law Journal 21 (2020): 55–65.
Globocnik, Jure. “The Right to Be Forgotten is Taking Shape: CJEU Judgments in GC and Others (C-136/17) and Google v CNIL (C-507/17).” GRUR International 69(4) (2020): 380–388.
Goldmann, Mattias. “As Darkness Deepens: The Right to be Forgotten in the Context of Authoritarian Constitutionalism.” German Law Journal 21 (2020): 45–54.
Kwak, Chanhee, Lee Junyeong, and Lee Heeseok. “Could You Ever Forget Me? Why People Want to be Forgotten Online.” Journal of Business Ethics 168, Issue 5 (2021): 3–21.
Machowicz, Kinga. “Observance of human rights as an element of shaping the position of the European enterprise in the knowledge-based economy.” Review of European and Comparative Law 44, no. 1 (2021): 7–18.
Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor. Delete: The virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.
Myers, Cayce. “Digital Immortality vs. “The Right to be Forgotten”: A Comparison of U.S. and E.U. Laws Concerning Social Media Privacy.” Revista Română de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice, no. 3XVI (2014): 47–60.
Jankélévitch, Vladimir. Forgiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
Jones, Meg Leta. Ctrl + Z: The Right to Be Forgotten. New York: New York University Press, 2018.
Kuner, Christopher. “The Court of Justice of the EU Judgment on Data Protection and Internet Search Engines.” LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 3 (2015). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2496060. Accessed March 27, 2021.
Larsen, Rebekah. “Mapping Right to be Forgotten frames: Reflexivity and empirical payoffs at the intersection of network discourse and mixed network methods.” New media & society 22(7) (2020): 1245–1265.
Pagallo, Ugo, and Massimo Durante. “Legal Memories and the Right to be Forgotten.” In Protection of Information and the Right to Privacy – A New Equilibrium?, edited by Luciano Floridi, 144. Oxford: Springer, 2014.
Rosen, Jeffrey. “The Right to Be Forgotten.” Stanford Law Review, Symposium Issue (2012): 88–95.
Tabaszewski, Robert. “The Permissibility of Limiting Rights and Freedoms in the European and National Legal System due to the Health Protection.” Review of European and Comparative Law 42, no. 3 (2020): 51–89.
Uncular, Selen. “The right to removal in the time of post-Google Spain: myth or reality under general data protection regulation?.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 33 (3) (2019): 309–329.
Wulff, Carsten M. “The Right to be Forgotten in Post-Google Spain Case Law: an Example of Legal Interpretivism in Action?.” Comparative Law Review 26 (2020): 255–279.