The European Union in multi-crisis: towards differentiated legal integration?

Piotr Tosiek

University of Warsaw , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3585-0262


Abstract

The aim of this article is to present a general forecast of the development of processes of legal integration in the European Union in the coming years. The European Union is in ‘multi-crisis’, which may force the member states to adopt an organizational development scenario based on differentiation. The selectivity of this differentiation is understood both in terms of the heterogeneity of integration in some areas and the reduction in the number of states fully participating in integration. An analysis of the current trends and solutions proposed and taken by EU decision-makers shows that the EU legal system is not subject to federalization, but in fact the tendency to deepen integration does not conflict with intergovernmentalism. The multiplicity of problems resulting from the multi-crisis will most likely require the deepening of the current differentiation mechanisms and the emergence of new ones.

Keywords:

European Union, differentiated integration, crisis, legal system, member state

Barcz, Jan. “Flexible Integration as a Target System of Governance for the European Union.” Yearbook of Polish European Studies 18 (2015): 59–79.

Barcz, Jan. Od lizbońskiej do polizbońskiej Unii Europejskiej. Główne kierunki reformy ustro-jowej procesu integracji europejskiej. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2020.

Bickerton, Christopher J., Dermot Hodson, and Uwe Puetter. “The New Intergovernmental-ism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era.” Journal of Common Market Studies 53, no. 4 (2015): 703–722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12212

Cianciara, Agnieszka K. “Does Differentiation Lead to Disintegration? Insights from Theories of European Integration and Comparative Regionalism.” Yearbook of Polish European Studies 18 (2015): 39–58.

De la Porte, Caroline, and Mads Dagnis Jensen. “The Next Generation EU: An Analysis of the Dimensions of Conflict Behind the Deal.” Social Policy & Administration 55, no. 2 (2021): 388–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12709

Duttle, Thomas, Katharina Holzinger, Thomas Malang, Thomas Schäubli, Frank Schimmelfen-nig, and Thomas Winzen. “Opting out from the European Union Legislation: the Differen-tiation of Secondary Law.” Journal of European Public Policy 24, no. 3 (2017): 406–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1149206

Everson, Michelle, and Christian Joerges. “Reconfiguring the Politics-Law Relationship in the Integration Project through Conflicts-Law Constitutionalism.” European Law Journal 18, no. 5 (2012): 644–666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00622.x

Grosse, Tomasz Grzegorz. “Can ‘Differentiated Integration’ Lead to a Federation in Eu-rope?.” Yearbook of Polish European Studies 18 (2015): 15–38.

Hendriarto, Prasetyono. “Undestanding of the Role of Digitalization to Business Model and Innovation: Economics and Business Review Studies.” Linguistics and Culture Review 5, no. S1 (2021): 160–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1347

Holzinger, Katharina, and Frank Schimmelfennig. “Differentiated Integration in the European Union: Many Concepts, Sparse Theory, Few Data.” Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 2 (2012): 292–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.641747

Jensen, Christian B., and Jonathan B. Slapin. “Institutional Hokey-Pokey: the Politics of Mul-tispeed Integration in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 6 (2012): 779–795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.610694

Joerges, Christian. “Integration durch Entrechtlichung. Ein Zwischenruf.” ZERP-Diskussionspapier, no. 1 (2007).

Joerges, Christian. “The Lisbon Judgement, Germany’s Sozialstaat, the ECJ’s Labour-Law Jurisprudence, and the Reconceptualisation of European Law as a New Type of Conflicts Law.” ZERP-Diskussionspapier, no. 1 (2010).

Joerges, Christian. Unity in Diversity as Europe’s Vocation and Conflicts Law as Europe’s Constitutional Form. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1723249

Kubin, Tomasz. “A ‘Last Resort’ or a ‘Bypass’? Development of Enhanced Cooperation and Its Meaning for the Problem of Stagnation of Integration in the European Union.” Year-book of Polish European Studies 20 (2017): 31–60.

Kubin, Tomasz. “Enhanced Cooperation, EMU Reforms and Their Implications for Differen-tiation of the European Union.” Baltic Journal of European Studies 7, no. 2 (2017): 84–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0011

Markakis, Menelaos. “Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in the EU: Brexit, the Eurozone Crisis, and Other Troubles.” Journal of International Economic Law, no. 23 (2020): 489–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa004

Moravcsik, Andrew. “Preferences, Power and Institutions in 21st-Century Europe.” Journal of Common Market Studies 56, no. 7 (2018): 1648–1674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12804

Nathwani, Jatin, Niels Lind, Ortwin Renn, and Hans Joachim Schnellnhuber. “Balancing Health, Economy and Climate Risk in a Multi-Crisis.” Energies 14, no. 4067 (2021): 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144067

Phelan, William. “European Legal Integration: Towards a More Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach.” Journal of Common Market Studies 56, no. 7 (2018): 1562–1577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12782

Puchala, Donald J. “Institutionalism, Intergovernmentalism, and European Integration: a Re-view Article.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37, no. 2 (1999): 317–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00165

Sassoli, David, Antonio Costa, and Ursula von der Leyen. Joint Declaration on the Confer-ence on the Future of Europe. Brussels, 10 March, 2021.

Schimmelfennig, Frank. Differentiation and Self-Determination in European Integration. Bar-celona and Leuven: Centre on Constitutional Change and Centre for Global Governance Studies, 2017.

Schimmelfennig, Frank. “Is Differentiation the Future of European Integration?.” In Perspec-tives on the Future of the EU, edited by Björn Fägersten, and Göran von Sydow, 102–103. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 2019.

Schimmelfennig, Frank, Dirk Leuffen, and Berthold Rittberger. The European Union as a System of Differentiated Integration: Interdependence, Politicization and Differentiation. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020835

Schimmelfennig, Frank. “The Choice for Differentiated Europe: an Intergovernmentalist The-oretical Framework.” Comparative European Politics 17, no. 2 (2019): 176–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00166-5

Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Thomas Winzen. “Grand Theories, Differentiated Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 26, no. 8 (2019): 1172–1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1576761

Tosiek, Piotr. “Integracja zróżnicowana jako cecha systemowa Unii Europejskiej. Perspektywa liberalno-międzyrządowa.” In Europa wielu prędkości. Problemy. Wyzwania. Konsekwen-cje, edited by Marek Golińczak, and Robert Klementowski, 53–68. Wrocław-Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IPN, 2021.

Tosiek, Piotr. Member State in the Decision-Making System of the European Union. The Example of Poland. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS, 2018.

Tosiek, Piotr. “Prawne gwarancje pozycji państwa członkowskiego w systemie decyzyjnym Unii Europejskiej.” In Unia Europejska po Traktacie z Lizbony. Pierwsze doświadczenia i nowe wyzwania, edited by Piotr Tosiek, 27–51. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS, 2011.

Download

Published
2022-03-10


Tosiek, P. (2022). The European Union in multi-crisis: towards differentiated legal integration?. Review of European and Comparative Law, 48(1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.13007

Piotr Tosiek  piotrtosiek@wp.pl
University of Warsaw

Dr. habil., Assistant Professor, Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw; correspondence address: ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 3, 00-047 Warszawa, Poland.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3585-0262



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons CC-BY