The ECHR Preamble vs. the European Arrest Warrant: balancing Human Rights protection and the principle of mutual trust in EU Criminal Law?
Nasiya Ildarovna Daminova
Chair for Public Law with Focus on International Law, University of Konstanz , Germanyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6112-7473
Abstract
As stated in the European Convention on Hu- man Rights Preamble, the aim of the Council of Europe is the achievement of greater unity between its members through the maintenance and realisation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms . Nowadays, the European Union includes the majority of the ECHR signatories (27 of 47) and incorporates the key legal instrument of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, namely the European Arrest Warrant Framework Decision . Nevertheless, the possible effects of the EAWFD on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights remain understudied – despite the crucial need to properly balance the enforcement of the principle of mutual recognition and Human Rights protection in the European Union. Since the first attempts to approach the EAWFD, the Strasbourg Court preferred to find the applications inadmissible (Pianese, Monedero Angora, Stapleton) or to establish a very high threshold for establishing a Convention violation within this context (Pirozzi). It will be argued that the newly developing Strasbourg Court’s case-law on the EAWFD (Castano, Bivolaru/Moldovan, Alosa) could potentially mark a new step in the judicial dialogue be- tween two European Courts. In the Castano and Bivolaru/ Moldovan rulings, the ECtHR – for the first time – found that the EU Member States had breached their obligations under Arts . 2 ( ́right to life ́) and 3 ( ́prohibition of torture ́) ECHR within the European Arrest Warrant context (murder/traffick- ing in human beings charges). At the same time, this interpre- tation opens the floor for discussion on potential applicability of other Convention provisions (Arts . 4, 5, 8, 13) to other offences listed in Art . 2(2) of the EAWFD (such as, for instance, corruption, fraud, computer-related crime etc .). Even though the Strasbourg Court has transposed the CJEU’s benchmarks of the EAW refusals legality assessment – i .e . a risk of inhuman or degrading treatment in the requesting State (Aranyosi/Căldăra ru), the EU Member States ́ courts are now forced – de facto – to consider an additional (ECHR-based) criterion for assessing the legality of refusals to execute the European Arrest Warrants. This can arguably pose further questions upon the entry into force of Protocol No. 15 ECHR which aims at the most effective realisation of the ́subsidiarity ́ principle in the European Convention system.
Keywords:
European Arrest Warrant , ECHR, CFREU, Castano, right to lifeReferences
Ardito, Stefania. “Protocollo n. 15 alla Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo.” Unionedirittiumani. 29 January, 2021. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://www.unionedirittiumani.it/protocollo-n-15-alla-convenzione-europea-dei-diritti-delluomo.
Biagioni, Giacomo. “Avotins v. Latvia. The Uneasy Balance Between Mutual Recognition
of Judgments and Protection of Fundamental Rights.” European Papers 1, no. 2 (2016): 578–596.
Bovend’Eerdt, Koen. “The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?” Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 32, no. 83 (2016): 112–121. (Crossref)
Callewaert, Johan. “Do we still need Article 6(2) TEU? Considerations on the absence of EU accession to the ECHR and its consequences.” Common Market Law Review 55, no. 6 (2018): 1685–1716. (Crossref)
Callewaert, Johan. “Manifest deficiency in the execution of a European arrest warrant – judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France.” Johan Callewaert. 4 April, 2021. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://johan-callewaert.eu/de/manifest-deficiency-in-the-execution-of-a-european-arrest-warrant-judgment-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-in-the-case-of-bivolaru-and-moldovan-v-france.
Callewaert, Johan. “Judgment of the ECHR in Romeo Castaño v. Belgium.” Johan Callewaert. 10 July, 2019. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://johan-callewaert.eu/de/judgment-of-the-echr-in-romeo-castano-v-belgium.
Colson, Renaud, and Steward Field, ed. EU Criminal Justice and the Challengesof Diversity: Legal Cultures in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. (Crossref)
Costello, Cathryn. The Human Rights of Migrants in European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. (Crossref)
De Burca, Grainne. “After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a Human Rights Adjudicator?” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 20, no.2 (2013): 168–184. (Crossref)
De Vries, Sybe, Ulf Bernitz, and Stephen Weatherill, ed. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Binding Instrument: Five Years Old and Growing. London: Hart Publishing, 2015.
Dörr, Oliver, and Kristen Schmalenbach, ed. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd ed). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2018. (Crossref)
Ferreira, Nuno, and Dora Kostakopoulou, ed. The Human Face of the European Union: Are EU Law and Policy Humane Enough? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. (Crossref)
Follesdal, Andreas. “The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in International Law.” Global Constitutionalism 2 (2013): 37–62. (Crossref)
Gáspár-Szilágyi, Szilard. “Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: Converging Human Rights Standards, Mutual Trust and a New Ground for Postponing a European Arrest Warrant.” European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 24, no. 2 (2016): 197–219. (Crossref)
Ghosh, Julian. “Tax Law and the Internal Market: A Critique of the Principle of Mutual Recognition.” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 16 (2014): 190. (Crossref)
Gill-Pedro, Eduardo, and Xavier Groussot. “The Duty of Mutual Trust in EU Law and the Duty to Secure Human Rights: Can the EU's Accession to the ECHR Ease the Tension?” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 35, no. 3 (2017): 258– 274. (Crossref)
Gragl, Paul. “An Olive Branch from Strasbourg: Interpreting the European Court of Human Rights' Resurrection of Bosphorus and Reaction to Opinion 2/13 in the Avotins Case: ECtHR 23 May 2016, Case No. 17502/07, Avotins v. Latvia.” European Constitutional Law Review 13, no. 3 (2017): 551–567. (Crossref)
Green, James, and Christopher Waters, ed. Adjudicating International Human Rights Essays in Honour of Sandy Ghandhi. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2014. (Crossref)
Hemme, Battjes. “The Soering Threshold: Why Only Fundamental Values Prohibit Refoulement in ECHR Case Law.” European Journal of Migration and Law 11, no. 3 (2009): 205–220. (Crossref)
Jahn, Jannika. “Normative Guidance from Strasbourg Through Advisory Opinions: Deprivation or Relocation of the Convention’s Core?” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 74, no. 4 (2014): 821–846.
Kanalan, Ibrahim. “Extraterritorial State Obligations Beyond the Concept of Jurisdiction.” German Law Journal 19, no. 1 (2018): 43–64. (Crossref)
Klimek, Libor. European Arrest Warrant. Heidelberg: Springer 2014. (Crossref)
Korenica, Fisnik, and Doli Dren. “No more unconditional ‘mutual trust’ between the Member States: an analysis of the landmark decision of the CJEU in Aranyosi and Caldararu.” European Human Rights Law Review 5 (2016): 542–555.
Korenica, Fisnik. The EU Accession to the ECHR: Between Luxembourg’s Search for Autonomy and Strasbourg’s Credibility on Human Rights Protection. Heidelberg: Springer, 2015. (Crossref)
Krommendijk, Jasper. “Bivolaru t. Frankrijk (EHRM, nr. 40324/16) – Bosphorus bijt in Bivolaru: over EHRM-toetsing tenuitvoerlegging EU-arrestatiebevelen.” EHRC. 7 June, 2021. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://www.ehrc-updates.nl/commentaar/211497?skip_boomportal_auth=1.
Kuijer, Martin. “The challenging relationship between the European Convention on Human Rights and the EU legal order: consequences of a delayed accession.” The International Journal of Human Rights 24, no. 7 (2020): 998–1010. (Crossref)
Lenaerts, Koen. “The Contribution of the European Court of Justice to the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59, no. 2 (2010): 255–301. (Crossref)
Lenaerts, Koen. “The Principle of Mutual Recognition in the EU's Area of Freedom,
Security and Justice: The fourth annual lecture in honour of Sir Jeremy Lever.” 30 January, 2015. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/news/2015-02-18-principle-mutual-recognition-eus-area-freedom-security-and-justice-judge-lenaerts.
Lovall, Erin. “European Court of Human Rights Released Judgment in Romeo Castaño v. Belgium Case Holding Belgium Failed to Uphold Obligations Under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.” ASIL. 19 August, 2019. Accessed September 20, 2021.https://www.asil.org/ILIB/european-court-human-rights-released-judgment-romeo-casta%C3%B1o-v-belgium-case-holding-belgium.
Miettinen, Samuli. Criminal Law and Policy in the European Union. London: Routledge, 2013. (Crossref)
Milner, David. “Protocols no. 15 and 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights in the context of the perennial process of reform: a long and winding road.” Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien 17, no. 1 (2014): 19–51. (Crossref)
Mitsilegas, Valsamis. “The Symbiotic Relationship Between Mutual Trust and Fundamental Rights in Europe’s Area of Criminal Justice.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 4 (2015): 457–480. (Crossref)
Mitsilegas, Valsamis. EU Criminal Law after Lisbon: Rights, Trust and the Transformation of Justice in Europe. London: Hart Publishing, 2016.
Mjöll Arnardóttir, Oddný. “Res Interpretata, Erga Omnes Effect and the Role of the Margin of Appreciation in Giving Domestic Effect to the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.” The European Journal of International Law 28, no. 3 (2017): 819–843. (Crossref)
Morano-Foadi, Sonia, and Lucy Vickers, ed. Fundamental Rights in the EU: A Matter for Two Courts. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015.
Neumann, Eva. “Europäische Einigkeit in Action: Menschenwürde im Strafvollzug: EuGH konkretisiert Mindestanforderungen für Haftbedingungen im Kontext des Europäischen Haftbefehls.” Voelkerrechtsblog. 31 October, 2019. Accessed September, 20 2021. https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/de/europaische-einigkeit-in-action-menschenwurde-im-strafvollzug.
O’Leary, Siofra. “Courts, Charters and Conventions: Making Sense of Fundamental Rights in the EU.” Irish Jurist 56 (2016): 4–41.
Ostropolski, Tomasz. “The CJEU as Defender of Mutual Trust.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 2 (2015): 166–178. (Crossref)
Pejčinović Burić, Marija. The Interlaken process: measures taken from 2010 to 2019 to secure the effective implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2020.
Pinto, Mattia. “Romeo Castaño: ‹meticulously elaborated interpretations› for the sake of prosecution.” Strasbourgobservers. 10 September, 2019.Accessed September 20, 2021. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2019/09/10/romeo-castano-meticulously-elaborated-interpretations-for-the-sake-of-prosecution.
Ruggeri, Stefano, and Serena Quattrocolo, ed. Personal Participation in Criminal Proceedings: A Comparative Study of Participatory Safeguards and in absentia Trials in Europe. Heidelberg: Springer, 2019.
Ruggeri, Stefano, ed. Human Rights in European Criminal Law: New Developments in European Legislation and Case Law after the Lisbon Treaty.
Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.
Ruggeri, Stefano. “Inaudito reo Proceedings, Defence Rights, and Harmonisation Goals in the EU: Responses of the European Courts and New Perspectives of EU Law.” The European Criminal Law Associations Forum 1 (2016): 42–51. (Crossref)
Ruiz Yamuza, Florentino-Gregorio. “LM case, a new horizon in shielding fundamental rights within cooperation based on mutual recognition. Flying in the coffin corner.” ERA Forum 20 (2020): 371–404. (Crossref)
Schabas, William, ed. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary (1st ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Smith, Emily. “Running Before We Can Walk? Mutual Recognition at the Expense of Fair Trials in Europe's Area of Freedom, Justice and Security.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 1 (2013): 82–98. (Crossref)
Tigroudja, Hélène. “Procedural Developments at International Human Rights Courts and Bodies.” The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 19,no. 2 (2020): 304–341. (Crossref)
Tinsley, Alex. “The Reference in Case C-396/11 Radu: When does the Protection of Fundamental Rights Require Non-execution of a European Arrest Warrant?” European Criminal Law Review 2 (2012): 338– 352. (Crossref)
Top, Sibel, and Paul De Hert. “Castaño avoids a clash between the ECtHR and the CJEU, but erodes Soering. Thinking human rights transnationally.” New Journal of European Criminal Law, 12, no. 1 (2021): 52–68. (Crossref)
Van den Brink, Ton. “The Impact of EU Legislation on National Legal Systems: Towards a New Approach to EU – Member State Relations.” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 19 (2017): 211–235. (Crossref)
Van den Herik, Larissa, and Nico Schrijver, ed. Counter-Terrorism Strategies in a Fragmented International Legal Order: Meeting the Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. (Crossref)
Von Danwitz, Luc. “In Rights We Trust: The ECtHR’s judgment in Romeo Castaño v. Belgium and the relationship between the ECHR and the principle of mutual trust in EU law.” Verfassungsblog. 21 August, 2019. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://verfassungsblog.de/in-rights-we-trust.
Wahl, Thomas. “ECtHR: EAW Cannot be Automatically Executed.” EUCRIM. 26 April, 2021. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://eucrim.eu/news/ecthr-eaw-cannot-be-automatically-executed.
Wouters, Jan and Michal Ovádek, Michal, ed. The European Union and Human Rights: Analysis, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. (Crossref)
Zamboni, Matteo. “Romeo Castaño v Belgium and the Duty to Cooperate under the ECHR.” Ejiltalk. 19 August, 2019. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://www.ejiltalk.org/romeo-castano-v-belgium-and-the-duty-to-cooperate-under-the-echr.
Chair for Public Law with Focus on International Law, University of Konstanz
Dr., Postdoctoral researcher, Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht mit internationaler Ausrichtung, Universität Konstanz, correspondence address: Universität Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.
