A Bottom-up Look at Mutual Trust and the Legal Practice of the Aranyosi Test
Abstract
This contribution offers an insight into the legal practice of the Aranyosi test during the EAW proceedings in seven Member States, an outcome of the research conducted during the ImprovEAW Project. Only the executing judicial authorities of some Member States do trigger the test. Member States are roughly differentiated between those having facilities with usually bad or usually good detention conditions, promoting antagonistic relationships instead of equal partnership. The lack of streamlining of the communication when supplementary information is requested, the lack of common standards and approach towards guarantees lead to further misunderstandings and frustration. The findings of this research have revealed the importance of departing from a pure legal understanding of mutual trust and follow a more empirical, experiential or bottom-up concept. Mutual trust is not only a legal concept, but it underpins the legal culture of the cooperation and collegial attitudes of authorities towards one another. This expression of mutual trust remains quite undiscovered: how is miscommunication affecting mutual trust? Do judicial authorities of legal systems express collegiality to one another? How do cultural aspects and preconceived ideas regarding the quality of other legal systems influence mutual trust? Accordingly, some suggestions have been made to improve the cooperation and the establishment of rapport when supplementary information is requested. Finally, I advocate for a more neutral view towards the Aranyosi test. As opposed to considering it as a supervisory mechanism, I have explored the idea of approaching it as a risk management tool: it tackles risks created by mutual trust. Such approach helps both sides to take responsibility to avert ad hoc risks, instead of experiencing Aranyosi as a testing moment. Such approach centres the real problem, i.e. the risks created by mutual trust for individuals and it can stimulate more proactive policy-making in this regard.
Keywords:
detention conditions, European Arrest Warrant, mutual trust, AranyosiReferences
Part of the research in this contribution was conducted under the EU-funded project ImprovEAW (2020-2022).
Barbosa, Renata, Vincent Glerum, Hans Kijlstra, André Klip, and Christina Peristeridou. Improving the European Arrest Warrant. Den Haag: Eleven, 2023.
Barbosa, Renata, Vincent Glerum, Hans Kijlstra, André Klip, Christina Peristeridou, Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek, and Adrian Zbiciak. European Arrest Warrant: Practice in Greece, the Netherlands and Poland. Den Haag: Eleven, 2022.
Bárd, Petra, and Wouter van Ballegooij “Judicial Independence as a Precondition for Mutual Trust? The CJEU in Minister for Justice and Equality v. LM.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 9, no. 3 (2018): 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284418801569. (Crossref)
Bárd, Petra, and Wouter van Ballegooij. “The Effect of CJEU Case Law Concerning the Rule of Law and Mutual Trust on National Systems.” In The Court of Justice and European Criminal Law: Leading Cases in a Contextual Analysis, edited by Valsamis Mitsilegas, Albert di Martino, and Leandro Mancano, 455–467. Chicago: Hart Publishing, 2019. (Crossref)
Brouwer, Eveline, and Gerard Damian. “Mapping Mutual Trust – an Introduction.” In Mapping Mutual Trust: Understanding and Framing the Role of Mu¬tual Trust in EU Law, edited by Evelien Brouwer and Damian Gerard, 1–3. EUI Working Paper: 2016.
Burchett, Julia, Anne Weyembergh, and Mart Ramat. Prisons and Detention Con¬ditions in the EU. Study PE 741.374, Policy Department for Citisens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate-General for Internal Policies, 2023.
ImprovEAW Research Project. Accessed April 2, 2023. https://www.improveaw.eu/.
ImprovEAW Research Project. Belgian Report on Improving Mutual Recogni¬tion of European Arrest Warrants through Common Practical Guidelines (ImprovEAW). 2021. https://www.improveaw.eu/files/belgiumpdf.
ImprovEAW Research Project. Irish Report on Improving Mutual Recogni¬tion of European Arrest Warrants through Common Practical Guidelines (ImprovEAW). 2021. https://www.improveaw.eu/files/irelandpdf.
ImprovEAW Research Project. Romanian Report on Improving Mutual Recogni¬tion of European Arrest Warrants through Common Practical Guidelines (Im¬provEAW). 2021. https://www.improveaw.eu/files/romaniapdf.
Klip, André. “Eroding Mutual Trust in an European Criminal Justice Area with¬out Added Value.” European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 28, no. 2 (2020): 109–119. (Crossref)
Klip, André. “The European Arrest Warrant, from Mutual Recognition to Mu¬tual Supervision.” European Criminal Law Review 12, no. 1 (2022): 80–98. (Crossref)
Koncewicz, Tomasz Tadeusz. “The Consensus Fights Back: European First Princi¬ples Against the Rule of Law Crisis.” Verfassungsblog, 5 April 2018. https://verfassungsblog.de/the-consensus-fights-back-european-first-principles-against-the-rule-of-law-crisis-part-1/.
Łazowski, Adam. “Aranyosi and Căldăraru through the Eyes of National Judges.” In The Court of Justice and European Criminal Law: Leading Cases in a Contextual Analysis, edited by Valsamis Mitsilegas, Albert di Martino, and Lean¬dro Mancano, 437–454. Chicago: Hart Publishing, 2019. (Crossref)
Marguery, TP. “Towards the End of Mutual Trust? Prison Conditions in the Con¬text of the European Arrest Warrant and the Transfer of Prisoners Framework Decisions,” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 25, no. 6 (2018): 712–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X18818662. (Crossref)
Martufi, Adriano, and Christina Peristeridou. “Pre-trial Detention and EU Law: Collecting Fragments of Harmonisation Within the Existing Legal Framework.” European Papers: A Journal on Law and Integration 5, no. 3 (2020):1477–1492. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/423.
Martufi, Adriano, and Daila Gigengack. “Exploring Mutual Trust through the Lens of an Executing Judicial Authority. The Practice of the Court of Amsterdam in EAW Proceedings.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 11, no. 3 (2020): 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284420946105. (Crossref)
Mitsilegas, Valsamis. “Conceptualising Mutual Trust in European Criminal Law: the Evolving Relationship between Legal Pluralism and Rights-Based Justice in the European Union.” In Mapping Mutual Trust: Understanding and Framing the Role of Mutual Trust in EU Law, edited by Evelien Brouwer and Damian Gerard, 23–36. EUI Working Paper: 2016.
Mitsilegas, Valsamis. “The Symbiotic Relationship between Mutual Trust and Fundamental Rights in Europe’s Area of Criminal Justice.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 6, no. 4 (2015): 457–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441500600410. (Crossref)
Rizcallah, Cecilia. Le principe de confiance mutuelle en droit de l’Union européenne. Un principe essentiel à l’épreuve d’une crise de valeurs. Bruxelles: BruyLant, 2020. (Crossref)
Rogan, Mary. “What Constitutes Evidence of Poor Prison Conditions after Aranyo¬si and Căldăraru? Examining the Role of Inspection and Monitoring Bodies in European Arrest Warrant Decision-Making.” New Journal of European Crimi¬nal Law 10, no. 3 (2019): 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284419858698. (Crossref)
van Ballegooij, Wouter. European Arrest Warrant – European Implementation As¬sessment. Study PE 642.839, European Parliamentary Research Service, 2020.
van Ballegooij, Wouter. The Nature of Mutual Recognition in European Law. Re-Examining the Notion from an Individual Rights Perspective with a View to Its Further Development in the Criminal Justice Area. Antwerp: Intersentia, 2015.
Weyembergh, Anne, and Lucas Pinelli. “Detention Conditions in the Issuing Member State as a Ground for Non-Execution of the European Arrest War¬rant: State of Play and Challenges Ahead”. European Criminal Law Review 12, no. 1 (2022): 25–52. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2022-1. (Crossref)
Zimmermann, Frank. “Concerns Regarding the Rule of Law as a Ground for Nonexecution of the European Arrest Warrant: Suggestions for a Reform.” European Criminal Law Review 12, no. 1 (2022): 4–24. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2022-1-4. (Crossref)
Maastricht University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6607-7583
