The Right to Self-Determination of Peoples through Examples of Åland Islands and Quebec : Recommendations for a Peaceful International Legal Order
Mirza Ljubović
International University of Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovinahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3574-4811
Abstract
In contemporary public international law, it is increasingly common that in many countries of the world and Europe, political representatives of the peoples are calling for an inalienable right to the external self-determination of the peoples involving secession to try to achieve their independence and autonomy, forming their national states to the detriment of already existing countries in which they are currently living. However, this may cause destabilization and wars in many complex multiethnic states and the European Union. Therefore, the Aland Islands and Quebec cases are extremely important for today’s understanding of the exercise of the right to self-determination of the people in contemporary public international law, in particular as the International Court of Justice in The Hague and the domestic courts invoke them as precedents to address all future cases of reference to the right of the people to external self-determination involving secession. Based on those cases, it has developed that the issue of secession is the question of the internal legal order of each sovereign country, which should deal with this issue through its constitutional legal order, and contemporary public international law should deal with its consequences. In connection with this, it is necessary to investigate and offer answers that will highlight possible abuses of the right to self-determination of all peoples as a collective human right in contemporary public international law. Such unlawful conduct may result in adverse legal consequences, in particular, the violation of basic principles of public international law, including the principles of territoriality and sovereignty of the states, the distortion of world peace and order, economic progress, the rule of law and the pursuit of basic human rights and freedoms, as well as other collective human rights, which may ultimately be the cause of provocation and lead to international and civil wars.
Keywords:
contemporary public international law; right to self-determination; peoples; secession; peaceReferences
Buchanan, Allen. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Bursać, Slobodanka. “Pravo Na Samoopredeljenje Naroda.” Međunarodni Problemi 62, no. 2 (2010): 276–313. (Crossref)
Cassese, Antonio. “The Approach of the Helsinki Declaration to Human Rights.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 13, no. 2 (2021): 275–291.
Castellino, Joshua, and Jérémie Gilbert. “Self-Determination, Indigenous Peoples and Minorities.” Macquarie Law Journal, no. 3 (2003): 155–178.
Costa, Daniel. “Great Power.” Britannica. Accessed February 3, 2023. https://www.britannica.com/topic/great-power.
Crawford, James. The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd ed. Oxford: New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 2006.
Gavrilović, Bojan. “Istorija Prava Na Samoopredeljenje, (R)Evolucija Prava Na Samoopredeljenje.” 2013, 1–26.
Hannum, Hurst. “Rethinking Self-Determination.” Virginia Journal of International Law 34, no. 1 (1993): 1–69.
Harris, Erika. “Paradoks, Kontroverza i Nacionalno Samoodređenje.” Politička Misao 52, no. 1 (2015): 191–202.
International Court of Justice. “East Timor (Portugal v. Australia.” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/84.
International Court of Justice. “Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970).” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/53.
Karadzoski, Mladen, and Goran Ilik. “Will the European Union Europeanise the Balkans to Avoid the Balkanisation of Europe?.” Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs 23, no. 4 (December 23, 2019): 41–72. (Crossref)
LII/Legal Information Institute. “Uti Possidetis Juris.” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/uti_possidetis_juris.
Lynch, Allen. “Woodrow Wilson and the Principle of ‘National Self-Determination’: A Reconsideration.” Review of International Studies 28, no. 2 (2002): 419–436. (Crossref)
O’Brien, Patricia. “The Åland Islands Solution A Precedent for Successful International Disputes Settlement.” Speech presented in the United Nations Headquarters, Delegates Entrance Lobby, January 17, 2012.
Office of the Historian. “Milestones: 1914–1920 – Wilson’s Fourteen Points, 1918.” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1914–1920/fourteen-points.
Office of the Historian. “Milestones: 1969–1976 – Helsinki Final Act, 1975.” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969–1976/helsinki.
Office of the Historian. “Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919, Volume XIII – The Covenant of the League of Nations (Art. 1 to 26).” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1919Parisv13/ch10subch1.
OHCHR. “Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples.” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-granting-independence-colonial-countries-and-peoples.
OHCHR. “International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights.
Pavković, Aleksandar, and Peter Radan. Creating New States: Theory and Practice of Secession, 2nd ed. Aldershot, Hampshire, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, 2013.
Pellet, Alain. “The Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee A Second Breath for the Self-Determination of Peoples.” European Journal of International Law 3, no. 1 (1992): 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035802. (Crossref)
Perry, Frederick V., and Scheherazade Rehman. “Secession, the Rule of Law and the European Union.” Connecticut Journal of International Law 123, no. 31 (2015): 61–91.
Šarčević, Edin. “Pravo Naroda Na Samoopredjeljenje Sa Otcjepljenjem.” May 8, 2022. https://edinsarcevic.wordpress.com/2022/05/08/pravo-naroda-na-samoopredjeljenje-sa-otcjepljenjem/.
Sasich, Angelina M. “The Right to Self-Determination and Its Implication on the Sovereign Right of States: The Inconsistent Application of International Standards for Independence concerning Kosovo.” Michigan State International Law Review 20, no. 2 (2012): 495–519.
Sterio, Milena. “On the Right to External Self-Determination: Selfistans, Secession, and the Great Powers’ Rule.” Minnesota Journal of International Law 19, no. 1 (2010): 137–76.
Supreme Court in Canada. “Reference Re Secession of Quebec – SCC Cases.” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1643/index.do.
The United Nations and Decolonization. “Non-Self-Governing Territories.” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://www.un.org/dppa/decolonization/en/nsgt.
United Nations Digital Library. “UN General Assembly (25th. sess.: 1970): Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States following the Charter of the United Nations, 1971.” https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/202170.
United Nations. “UN Charter.” Accessed February 3, 2023. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter.
Vidmar, Jure. “Remedial Secession in International Law: Theory and (Lack of) Practice.” St Antony’s International Review 6, no. 1 (2010): 37–56.
Zoubir, Yahia H. “The United States, the Soviet Union and Decolonization of the Maghreb, 1945–62.” Middle Eastern Studies 31, no. 1 (1995): 58–84. (Crossref)
International University of Sarajevo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3574-4811
