Detention Pending Execution of the European Arrest Warrant – Dutch and Polish Experience. Some Reflection from the Human Rights Perspective

Vincent Glerum

University of Groningen , Netherlands
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7668-1939

Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek

The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin , Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9761-3177


Abstract

This article focuses on detention pending surrender, i.e. detention of the requested person in the executing Mem­ber State on the basis of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). It defines the scope of application of Article 5 of the Euro­pean Convention on Human Rights to such detention and anal­yses the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on time limits of keeping the requested person in detention in the executing MS as well as on the notion of “the execut­ing judicial authority” entitled to decide on detention pending surrender. Both issues are explored with reference to national law and practice of the Netherlands and Poland. The article pro­vides the answer to the question whether national provisions which limit the duration of detention pending surrender prop­erly reflect the normative content of the framework decision on the EAW. The answer to this question is given with due regard to the standard of protection of the requested person stemming from Article 5 § 1 ECHR and Article 6 of the Charter of Funda­mental Rights. Furthermore, the analyses focus on Dutch and Polish provisions concerning the authority entitled to decide on detention pending surrender and their compliance with the CJEU’s jurisprudence on the notion of “the executing ju­dicial authority.” Recognising that detention is the basic meas­ure for ensuring the effectiveness of surrender, we try to define the limits of its use in the EAW procedure, stemming from the requirements of protection of human rights.

Keywords:

European Arrest Warrant, detention pending surrende, Article 5 ECHR, executing judicial authority

Augustyniak, Barbara. „Komentarz do art. 607n kodeksu postępowania karne¬go.” In Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, tom II, edited by Dariusz Świecki, 1202. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2022.

Baran, Bartosz. „Ograniczenia temporalne tymczasowego aresztowania w toku postępowania w przedmiocie wykonania ENA – glosa do postanowie¬nia Sądu Apelacyjnego w Katowicach z 30.06.2010 r.” Europejski Przegląd Sądowy, no. 6 (June 2011): 46–49.

Bargis, Marta. “Personal Freedom and Surrender.” In Handbook of Euro¬pean Criminal Procedure, edited by Roberto Kostoris, 297–352. Springer, 2018. (Crossref)

Glerum, Vincent, and Hans Kijlstra. “The Practice in the Netherlands.” In Euro¬pean Arrest Warrant. Practice in Greece, the Netherlands, and Poland, Maas¬tricht Law Series, 23, 93–236. The Hague: Eleven, 2022.

Glerum, Vincent. “Commentaar op Overleveringswet.” In T&C Internationaal strafrecht, edited by Jannemieke Ouwerkerk, Vincent Glerum, and Lachezar Yanev (Deventer: Wolters Kluwer, 2021; online updated to 1 July 2023).

Glerum, Vincent. “Dura lex, sed lex? Divergerende nationale rechtspraak, de verplichting tot kaderbesluitconforme uitleg en de eis van een duidelijke en voorzienbare wettelijke grondslag voor vrijheidsbeneming.” SEW 67, no. 12 (December 2019): 562–567.

Klip, André. European Criminal Law. An Integrative Approach. Cambridge–Ant¬werp–Chicago: Intersentia, 2021.

Martufi, Adriano, and Christina Peristeridou. “Pre-trial Detention and EU Law: Collecting Fragments of harmonisation within the Existing Legal Frame¬work.” European Papers 5, no. 3 (December 2020): 1477–1492.

Miąsik, Dawid, and Monika Szwarc. “Primacy and Direct Effect – Still Together: Popławski II.” Common Market Law Review 58, no. 2 (April 2021): 571–590. (Crossref)

Sakowicz, Andrzej, and Adam Górski. „Komentarz do art. 607n kodeksu postę¬powania karnego.” In Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, edited by Andrzej Sakowicz, 1772. Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 2023.

Sakowicz, Andrzej. Opinion on the Draft Law, 34, https://orka.sejm.gov.pl/rex-domk6.nsf/Opdodr?OpenPage&nr=1394.

Schilling, Theodor. „Europäischer Haftbefehl und europäisches Verfassungs¬recht.“ In Probleme des Rahmenbeschlusses am Beispiel des Europäischen Haftbefehls. Ein neues Instrument der europäischen Integration aus Sicht von Europarecht, Strafrecht, Verfassungsrecht und Völkerrecht, edited by Otto La¬godny, Ewald Wiederin, and Roland Winkler, 97–123. Neue Wissenschaft¬licher Verlag, 2007.

Skorupka, Jerzy. “The Limits of Interference with the Personal Liberty of an Individual and with the Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Criminal Proceedings.” In The Model of Acceptable Interference with the Rights and Freedoms of an Individual in the Criminal Process, edited by Jerzy Skorupka, 493–580. Warsaw: C.H. Beck, 2019.

Steinborn, Sławomir. „Komentarz do art. 607k kodeksu postępowania karnego.” In Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, tom III, edited by Lech Krzysz¬tof Paprzycki, 870–887. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2013.

Steinborn, Sławomir. „Komentarz do art. 607o kodeksu postępowania karnego.” In Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, tom III, edited by Lech Krzysz¬tof Paprzycki, 904–913. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2013.

Tak, Peter. “The Dutch Prosecution Service.” In Task and Powers of the Prosecu¬tion Services in the EU Member States, edited by Peter Tak, 16–26. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2004.

Trechsel, Stefan, with the assistance of Sarah J. Summers. Human Rights in Crim¬inal Proceedings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Van der Hulst, Jaap. “Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant in the Neth¬erlands.” Eucrim, no. 2 (June 2014): 64–68. (Crossref)

Wąsek-Wiaderek, Małgorzata, and Adrian Zbiciak. “The Practice of Poland on the European Arrest Warrant.” In European Arrest Warrant. Practice in Greece, the Netherlands and Poland, Maastricht Law Series 23, 237–321. The Hague: Eleven, 2022.

Wąsek-Wiaderek, Małgorzata. “»Dual Legal Representation« of a Requested Per¬son in European Arrest Warrant Proceedings – Remarks from the Polish Perspective.” Review of European and Comparative Law 41, no. 2 (June 2020): 35–54. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.8673. (Crossref)

Download

Published
2023-09-30


Glerum, V., & Wąsek-Wiaderek, M. (2023). Detention Pending Execution of the European Arrest Warrant – Dutch and Polish Experience. Some Reflection from the Human Rights Perspective. Review of European and Comparative Law, 54(3), 89–124. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.16268

Vincent Glerum 
University of Groningen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7668-1939
Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek  malgorzata.wasek-wiaderek@kul.pl
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9761-3177



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.