Beneficial Ownership – Demand for Transparency, Threat to Privacy

Sonja Cindori

University of Zagreb , Croatia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0134-9285


Abstract

The basic idea behind establishing the register of beneficial owners is to increase the transparency and accessibility of data on beneficial ownership of companies and other legal entities with the aim of ensuring the public availability of data on domestic and foreign natural and legal persons. However, the possibility of the data being accessible to the general public instead of to persons or organizations that can demonstrate a legitimate interest raised the issue of violating the principles of respect for private or family life and the protection of personal data. Consequently, this raises the question of drawing the line between contributing to the common good and fighting against money laundering and terrorist financing, on the one hand, and protecting personal data, with the possibility of their misuse, on the other. A balance as well as a response to the possibility of setting soft limits of legitimate interest that would result in the achievement of all set goals was sought in the practice of the European Court of Justice. One of the legislative solutions regarding the extent of access to data on beneficial owners for the entire public, along with the establishment of different types of registers in order to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, is described using the example of Croatia.

Keywords:

beneficial owner, register, transparency, fraud, due diligence

Buterin, Denis, Nikolina Blašković, and Aidone Eda Ribarić. “Suzbijanje kružnih prijevara u cilju zaštite javnih financija Hrvatske.” Zbornik Veleučilišta u Rijeci 2, no. 1 (2014): 91–105.

European Commission. “Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council assessing whether Member States have duly identified and made subject to the obligations of Directive (EU) 2015/849 all trusts and similar legal arrangements governed under their laws.” Brussels, Belgium, 16 September 2020, COM(2020) 560 final. Accessed April 27, 2023. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0560.

FATF. “Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons.” Paris, France, 2023. Accessed April 24, 2023. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/fatf-gafi/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Guidance-Beneficial-Ownership-Legal-Persons.html.

FATF. “Best Practices on Beneficial Ownership for Legal Persons.” Paris, France, 2019. Accessed April 24, 2023. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/fatf-gafi/en/publications/Methodsandtrends/Best-practices-beneficial-ownership-legal-persons.html.

FATF. “FATF Report to the G20 Beneficial Ownership.” Paris, France, 2016. Accessed April 18, 2023. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/fatf-gafi/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Guidance-Beneficial-Ownership-Legal-Persons.html.

OECD. “Lack of Proportionality Between Ownership and Control: Overview and Issues for Discussion.” OECD Steering Group on Corporate Governance, OECD, Paris, France, 2007. Accessed May 8, 2023. https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/40038351.pdf.

Vermeulen, Erik P. M. “Beneficial Ownership and Control: A Comparative Study – Disclosure, Information and Enforcement.” OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers, no. 7 (2013). Accessed March 28, 2023. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5k4dkhwckbzv-en.pdf?expires=1682345213&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=A7E39B2A0AF7BEB1079DD80ED29325CB.

Download

Published
2023-12-29


Cindori, S. (2023). Beneficial Ownership – Demand for Transparency, Threat to Privacy. Review of European and Comparative Law, 55(4), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.16352



License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.