Israel – In Search of Constitutional Common Sense
Paweł Sadowski
Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9480-643X
Abstract
The Israeli radical judicial overhaul program, aiming to seriously weaken the judiciary, has led the country to the brink of chaos and violence, with hundreds of thousands of demonstrators in the streets, society tearing itself apart and numerous sectors of society, such as medical service or reservists of IDF, announcing a suspension of their service to a nation they fear will no longer be a democracy. Despite the strong social protest, Knesset – representing an extremely right-wing coalition – adopted on the July 24, 2023 the amendment to Basic Law: The Judiciary to bar the judiciary from striking down decisions of the government and its ministers on the grounds of such decisions being unreasonable. The measure known as the reasonableness clause (standard) is rooted in English and American case law and it is frequently used in Israel to control administrative activity. It allows the courts to strike down governmental and administrative decisions and their regulations seen as having not taken into account all the relevant considerations of a particular issue, or not given the correct weight to those considerations – even if they do not violate any particular law or administrative rulings. The current right-wing coalition, led by Benjamin Netanyahu, argues that the clause as it stands gives too much power to the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court sitting as a High Court of Justice, to interfere with the actions of the executive, and that the powers of judges, who are not elected by the public, remain out of control in this procedure. Opponents of the government’s amendment argue that this standard is crucial in helping to protect civil rights that are not fully defined in Israeli law. Eliminating the standard of reasonableness will be another step towards giving the government unlimited power. It violates not only the separation of powers principle and the rule of law but it also harms the right to good administration. Irrespective of the Supreme Court’s decision on the constitutionality of the government’s amendment, the struggle to maintain the democratic principles of the Israeli system will continue.
Despite the strong social protest, Knesset – representing extremely right-wing coalition –adopted on the 24th of July 2023 the amendment to Basic Law: Judiciary to bar the judiciary from striking down decisions of the government and its ministers on the basis of being unreasonable. The measure known as the reasonableness clause (standard) is rooted in English and American case law bless and it is frequently used in Israel to control the administrative activity. It allows the courts to strike down governmental and administrative decisions and their regulations seen as having not taken into account all the relevant considerations of a particular issue, or not given the correct weight to those considerations – even if they do not violate and particular law or administrative rulings. The current right-wing coalition, led by Beniamin Netanyahu, argues that the clause as it stands gives too much scope to the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court sitting as a High Court of Justice, to interfere with the actions of the executive, and that the powers of judges, who are not elected by the public, remain out of control in this procedure.
Opponents to the government’s amendment argue that this standard is crucial in helping to protect civil rights that are not fully defined in Israeli law. Eliminating the standard of reasonableness will be another step towards giving the government unlimited power. It violates not only the separation of powers principle and rule of law but it also harms the right to good administration.
Irrespectively of the Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of the government's amendment, the struggle to maintain the democratic principles of the Israeli system will continue.
Keywords:
Israel, the principle of reasonableness, supreme court, high court of justiceReferences
Alexy, Robert. “Reasonableness of the Law.” In Reasonableness and Law, edited by Giorgio Bongiovanni, Giovanni Sartor, and Chiara Valentini, 3–15. Springer, 2009. (Crossref)
Barak, Aharon. Interpretation in the Law, Vol. 3 of constitutional interpretation, Tel Aviv: Nevo Publishing, 1994.
Barak, Aharon. “The Role of the Supreme Court in Democracy.” Hastings Law Review 53, (2002): 1205–16.
Barak-Erez, Daphne. “Israeli Administrative Law at the Crossroads: Between the English and American Model.” Israeli Law Review 40, no. 1 (2008): 56–71. (Crossref)
Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai, Itay Cohen, and Chani Koth. “The Changing Role of Judicial Review during Prolonged Emergencies: The Israeli Supreme Court during COVID-19.” Legal Policy and Pandemics: The Journal of the Global Pandemic Network, Bar Ilan University Faculty of Law Research Paper 1, no. 1–2–3 (2021): 271–7. (Crossref)
Bendor, Ariel, and Zeev Segal. “The Judicial Discretion of Justice A. Barak.” Tulsa Law Review 47, no. 2 (2013): 465–77.
Bendor, Ariel. “Are There Any Limits to Justiciability.” Indiana International Law and Comparative Law Review 7, no. 2 (1997): 311–77. (Crossref)
Diver, Colin S. “Israeli Administrative Law from American Perspective.” Mishpat Umimshal, Haifa University Law and Government Review 4 (1997).
Eyal, Yotam. “Hypocrisy Unmasked: The Supreme Court’s ‘Reasonableness’ Clause.” Israeli National News, January 30, 2023. Accessed October 12, 2023. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/373488.
Friedmann, Daniel. The Purse and the Sword. Oxford University Press, 2016. (Crossref)
Globes Whistleblower Team. “Why Is Reasonableness Making Us So Unreasonable?.” Accessed September 12, 2023. https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-why-is-reasonableness-making-us-so-unreasonable-1001451948.
Hermann, Tamar, and Or Anabi. “Overhauling the Judicial System – What Do Israelis Think?.” IDI, February 3, 2023. Accessed September 12, 2023. https://en.idi.org.il/articles/47607.
Hofnung, Menachem. “The Unintended Consequences of Unplanned Constitutional Reform: Constitutional Politics in Israel.” American Journal of Comparative Law 44, no. 4 (1996): 585–604. (Crossref)
Israeli Policy Forum. “Judicial Legislation Tracker.” Accessed September 1, 2023. https://israelpolicyforum.org/judicial-legislation-tracker/.
Kantorovich, Eugene. “Why Netanyahu Is Right to Go After Overmighty Supreme Court.” The Jewish Chronicle, February 2, 2023. Accessed June 12, 2023. https://www.thejc.com/lets-talk/all/why-netanyahu-is-right-to-go-after-overmighty-supreme-court-2PO7FKJsgtBxFECAULuBeD.
Kapiszewski, Diana, Gordon Silverstein, and Robert A. Kagan. Consequential Courts. Judicial Roles in Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2013. (Crossref)
MacCormick, Neil. Rethoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford University Press, 2005.
Mashaw, Jerry. Reasoned Administration and Democracy Legitimacy. Cambridge University Press, 2018. (Crossref)
Meydani, Assaf. Anatomy of Human Rights in Israel. Cambridge University Press, 2014. (Crossref)
Navot, Suzie. “Does Israel Really Need Judicial Reform? 5 Better Ways to Fix Judiciary.” IDI, March 10, 2022. Accessed June 12, 2023. https://en.idi.org.il/articles/47921.
Navot, Suzie. Even in Friedman – Albashan’s „compromise” framework, there is only power, IDI, 10 marca 2023 r.
Navot, Suzie. “The Reasonableness Issue Requires Serious, Informed, and Consensual Discussion.” IDI, July 14, 2023. Accessed July 16, 2023. https://en.idi.org.il/articles/50172.
Navot, Suzie. “There’s No ‘Compromise’ in the Coalition’s Play for Unlimited Power.” IDI, March 22, 202. Accessed July 16, 2023. https://en.idi.org.il/articles/48542.
Neustadt, Richard E. Presidential power. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1980.
Roznai, Yaniv and Okubasu Munabi. “Stability of Constitutional Structures and Identity Amidst ‘Political Settlement’: Lessons from Kenya and Israel.” Comparative Constitutional Studies 1, no. 1 (2023): 101–23. (Crossref)
Roznai, Yaniv, Rosalind Dixon, and David Landau. “Judicial Reform or Abusive Constitutionalism in Israel.” Israel Law Review. Forthcoming, UNSW Law Research Paper, no. 23–55. Accessed September 4, 2023. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4556656&fbclid=IwAR2ZamiVnyGfXYlRD58VQGKNicRTYGaTZKOH0mvlj2ux2bBf3AJsk-_JM2k.
Roznai, Yaniv. Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments. The Limits of Amendment Powers. Oxford University Press, 2019. (Crossref)
Shany, Yuval. “Eliminating the Standard of Reasonableness Would be Another Step towards Giving the Government Unlimited Power.” IDI, July 6, 2023. Accessed July 7, 2023. https://en.idi.org.il/articles/50104.
Sharon, Jeremy. “A Time for Reason: Will the High Court Strike Down Government’s Reasonableness Law?.” Times of Israel. July 26, 2023. Accessed 16 July 2023. https://www.timesofisrael.com/a-time-for-reason-will-the-high-court-strike-down-governments-reasonableness-law.
Sharon, Jeremy. “The Reason for Reasonableness: A Doctrine at the Heart of the Overhaul Explained.” Times of Israel, July 8, 2023. Accessed July 16, 2023. https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-reason-for-reasonableness-a-doctrine-at-the-heart-of-the-overhaul-explained/.
Staff, Toi. “Ex-top Judge Refutes Pm’s Use of His Name: Reasonableness Bill Undermines Rule of Law.” Times of Israel, July 23, 2023. Accessed July 23, 2023. https://sephardicu.com/featured/ex-top-judge-refutes-pms-use-of-his-name-reasonableness-bill-undermines-rule-of-law/.
Wattad, Mohammed S. “The Reasonableness Standard: A Critical Administrative Tool for Oversite of Executive Authority.” The Institute of National Security Studies, July 24, 2023. Accessed July 25, 2023. https://www.inss.org.il/social_media/the-reasonableness-standard-a-critical-administrative-tool-for-oversight-of-the-executive-authority/.
Zamir, Yitzhak. “Courts and Politics in Israel.” Public Law, no. 529 (winter 1991): 534–5.
Zamir, Yitzhak. “Unreasonableness, Balance of Interests and Proportionality.” Tel Aviv University Studies in Law 11 (1992): 131–6.
Zaring, David. “Rule by Reasonableness.” Administrative Law Review 63, no. 3 (2011): 525–60.
Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9480-643X
