Suspension of the Main Proceedings and Referral for a Preliminary Rul-ing. Gloss to the Judgment of the CJEU in Case C-176/22, Bk And ZhP, of 17 May 2023
Dimitris Liakopoulos
International and European Criminal and Procedural Law in various Universities in US and Europe , United Kingdomhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6803-5774
Abstract
The preliminary reference as an appeal of the Court of Justice of the European Union presents many complexities and complicated interpretations over time, given that we have a national judge in the scene of the appeal process, often creating problems but also solutions for greater effectiveness of the law of the European Union and respect for domestic law. The preliminary ruling aims to resolve disputes between internal jurisdictions and evaluate compatibility with EU law, especially in the national procedural sector. Ensuring a postponement of the EU and, above all, protecting the rights of individuals in a concrete, complete and effective way is still questionable research, not so much on a theoretical level but also on a procedural one.Keywords:
CJEU, preliminary ruling, Article 23 of the Statute of the CJEU, Article 267 TFEU, interpretationReferences
Blanke, Hermann-Josef, and Stelio Mangiameli. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. A Commentary. Berlin: Springer, 2021. (Crossref)
Bobek, Michal, and Jeremias Adams-Prassl. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Member States. Oxford & Oregon, Portland: Hart Publishing, 2020. (Crossref)
Broberg Morten, and Niels Fenger. Broberg and Fenger on Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. (Crossref)
Broberg, Morten, and Niels Fenger. “The European Court of Justice’s Transformation of Its Approach Towards Preliminary References from Member State Administrative Bodies.” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 24 (2022): 169–200. (Crossref)
Jarass, Hans P. Charta der Grundrecht der Europäischen Union: GRCh. München: C.H. Beck, 2020.
Liakopoulos, Dimitris. “Transnationality and Application of EU Law in National Legislation. Analysis, Critics and Comparison in CJEU Jurisprudence.” In Revista General de Derecho Constitucional, no. 30 (2019): 2–80.
Peers, Steve, et al. (eds.). The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, A Commentary. Oxford & Oregon, Portland: Hart Publishing, Nomos, C.H. Beck, 2021.
Pertek, Jacques. Le renvoi préjudiciel. Droit, liberté ou obligation de coopération des jurisdictions nationales avec la CJUE. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2021.
Rodriguez Medal, Jaime. “Concept of a Court or Tribunal under the Reference for a Preliminary Ruling: Who Can Refer Questions to the Court of Justice of the EU?.” In European Journal of Legal Studies 8, no. 1 (2015): 104–46.
Tinière, Romain, and Claire Vial. Les dix ans de la Charte des droits fondamentaux e l'Union europèenne. Bruxelles: Larcier, 2020. (Crossref)
Wägenbaur, Bertrand. “Art. 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.” In Bertrand Wägenbaur, Court of Justice of the EU. Commentary on Statute and Rules of Procedure (München, Oxford, Oregon, Baden: C.H. Beck, Nomos, Hart Publishing, 2013).
International and European Criminal and Procedural Law in various Universities in US and Europe https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6803-5774
