A Framework for Conditional Sunset Clauses
Abstract
Sunset clauses are a legislative method ensuring that a law expires at a certain time. This legislative tool can be further divided into conditional and unconditional sunset clauses. While unconditional sunset clauses are well-known and without much controversy – the duration of a law in such a case is usually dependent on a specific date – conditional sunset clauses are more complex and less debated. This article develops a structured framework of conditional sunset clauses that distinguishes these clauses primarily by a measure of legal certainty. The article divides conditional sunset clauses into three distinct categories: formal, semi-formal, and non-formal sunset clauses. With examples of their use across jurisdictions, it shows their differences – formal sunset clauses are based on public authority and are an official source of law (they are typically also published in an official statute book or public register), while semi-formal ones are also based on public authority, but any transparently published information is sufficient for their classification. Non-formal sunset clauses may be linked to actors other than the public authority and the reference to them may be non-public; however, the key question regarding these sunset clauses is whether they can be considered legal. This study highlights the challenges in applying conditional sunset clauses, their impact on the predictability of law, the separation of powers and the democratic rule of law as a whole. This framework enables legislators, judges and especially legal scholars to effectively classify these sunset clauses and to contrast them with their local legal orders, constitutions and laws.
Keywords:
Conditional sunset clauses, Legal certainty, Legislative framework, Constitutional law, Comparative lawSupporting Agencies:
The work was supported by the grant SVV n. 260 749, “Global Change and the Public Law Response to It”.References
Alexy, Robert. “Legal Certainty and Correctness.” Ratio Juris 28, no. 4 (2015): 441–51. (Crossref)
Bar-Siman-Tov, Ittai. “Temporary Legislation, Better Regulation, and Experimentalist Governance: An Empirical Study.” Regulation & Governance 12, no. 2 (2018): 192–219. (Crossref)
Baugus, Brian, Feler Bose, and Jeffry Jacob. “Get in Line: Do Part-Time Legislatures Use Sunset Laws to Keep Executive Agencies in Check.” Regulation & Governance 15, no. 1 (2021): 185–99. (Crossref)
“Condition and Time Term – Max-EuP 2012.” Accessed January 7, 2025. https://maxeup2012.mpipriv.de/index.php/Condition_and_Time_Term.
Dienstbier, Jakub. Teorie mimořadneho vladnuti. Prague: Wolters Kluwer, 2024.
Fagan, Frank, and Fırat Bilgel. “Sunsets and Federal Lawmaking: Evidence from the 110th Congress.” International Review of Law and Economics 41 (2015): 1–16. (Crossref)
Fisch, Jill, and Steven Davidoff Solomon. “The Problem of Sunsets Symposium: Institutional Investor Activism in the 21st Century: Responses to a Changing Landscape.” Boston University Law Review 99, no. 3 (2019): 1057–94.
Fuller, Lon Luvois. The Morality of Law, rev. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973.
Ginsburg, Tom, Jonathan S. Masur, and Richard H. McAdams. “Libertarian Paternalism, Path Dependence, and Temporary Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 81, no. 1 (2013): 291–359.
Goodhart, Charles A.E. “The Changing Role of Central Banks.” Financial History Review 18, no. 2 (2011): 135–54. (Crossref)
Henderson, James. “The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on Global Gas Markets.” Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 11, no. 1 (2024): 1–9. (Crossref)
Ip, John. “Sunset Clauses and Counterterrorism Legislation.” Public Law 74, (2012). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1853945. (Crossref)
Janssen, Marijn, Yannis Charalabidis, and Anneke Zuiderwijk. “Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government.” Information Systems Management 29, no. 4 (2012): 258–68. (Crossref)
Kouroutakis, Antonios. “The Virtues of Sunset Clauses in Relation to Constitutional Authority.” Statute Law Review 41, no. 1 (2020): 16–31. (Crossref)
McGarrity, Nicola, Rishi Gulati, and George Williams. “Sunset Clauses in Australian Anti-Terror Laws.” Adelaide Law Review 33, no. 2 (2012): 307–33.
Molloy, Sean. “Approach with Caution: Sunset Clauses as Safeguards of Democracy?.” European Journal of Law Reform 23, no. 2 (2021): 147–66. (Crossref)
Morgan-Jones, Edward, and Mathew Loveless. “Early Election Calling and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Government and Opposition 58, no. 3 (2023): 598–622. (Crossref)
Pal, Michael. “Electoral Management Bodies as a Fourth Branch of Government.” Review of Constitutional Studies 21, no. 1 (2016): 85–114.
Popelier, Patricia. “Five Paradoxes on Legal Certainty and the Lawmaker.” Legisprudence 2, no. 1 (2008): 47–66. (Crossref)
Popelier, Patricia. “Legal Certainty and Principles of Proper Law Making.” European Journal of Law Reform 2, no. 3 (2000): 321–42.
Ranchordas, Sofia. Constitutional Sunsets and Experimental Legislation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.
Ranchordas, Sofia. “Snoozing Democracy: Sunset Clauses, De-Juridification, and Emergencies.” Minnesota Journal of International Law 25, no. 1 (2016): 29–77.
Řiha, Michal. “Dočasnost zakona jako hodnota chtěna a nechtěna.” Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica 66, no. 1 (2020): 69–76. (Crossref)
Urbano, Eva M., Konstantinos Kampouropoulos, and Luis Romeral. “Energy Crisis in Europe: The European Union’s Objectives and Countries’ Policy Trends-New Transition Paths?.” Energies 16, no. 16 (2023): 5957. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16165957. (Crossref)
Weng, Charlie Xiao-chuan, and Arena Jingjing Hu. “Every Sunset Is an Opportunity to Reset: An Analysis of Dual-Class Share Regulations and Sunset Clauses.” Journal of Corporate Law Studies 22, no. 1 (2022): 571–603. (Crossref)
Xanthaki, Helen. Drafting Legislation: The Art and Technology of Rules for Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014.
