Virtual Conciliation and Mediation Hearings: A Systematic Review
André Luiz Alves
ENFAM—National School for the Training and Improvement of Magistrates , Brazilhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-6648-1081
Fabrício Castagna Lunardi
ENFAM—National School for the Training and Improvement of Magistrates , Brazilhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9512-8394
Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia
University of Coimbra , Portugalhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3111-9843
Abstract
This article aims to conduct a systematic review on virtual conciliation and mediation hearings to identify their strengths, weaknesses, and areas for concern. The study employs a systematic review methodology, allowing for the identification, selection, analysis, and synthesis of relevant academic works. The research is directly linked to digital judicial governance, examining its dimensions in terms of accessibility, resources, structure, and judicial performance. By reviewing and analyzing the scientific studies available on Scopus, Web of Science, HeinOnline and Google Scholar databases, this study identifies recurring analytical dimensions and provides a framework that can serve as a basis for future research, contributing to the advancement of this area of knowledge.
Keywords:
virtual hearings, conciliation and mediation, technological transformation, judiciary, systematic reviewSupporting Agencies:
Funded by FCT-Portugal National Agency within the scope of its strategic project: UIDB/04643/2020. Funded by the ENFAM-National School for the Training and Improvement of Magistrates.References
Abreu, Raphaella, and Pedro Arruda Junior. “A conciliacao como metodo de solucao de conflitos: desafios enfrentados para sua efetivacao no periodo de pandemia do Covid-19.” In Anais do V Congreso Latinoamericano y Caribeno de Ciencias Sociais: Democracia, justicia e igualdad, 486–501. Montevideu: FLACSO Uruguay, 2022.
Alexander, Nadja M. “Mediation: The New Normal?.” Law and Covid-19 1, no. 1 (2021): 245–54.
Alves, Claudio J.F. “As adaptacoes do processo civil diante da pandemia de Covid-19: uma analise dos impactos nos processos de familias e nas audiencias de instrucao e julgamento.” Undergraduate diss., Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, 2021.
Alves, Thiago P.S.G. “As alteracoes do processo civil diante da pandemia da Covid-19: uma analise dos impactos nas audiencias de conciliacao e de instrucao e julgamento.”Revista Humanidades e Inovacao 9, no. 16 (2022): 350–62.
Amaral, Leticia R. “Mediacao e pandemia: os meios tecnologicos como ferramenta da mediacao em tempos de pandemia.” Undergraduate diss., Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Goias, 2021.
de Araujo Filho, Jose G., Fabricio C. Lunardi, Adalmir De Oliveira Gomes, and Pedro M.A.R. Correia. “Access to Justice and Digital Inclusion in the Amazon: Geographic Vulnerability and Riverside Communities.” Virtual Economics 7, no. 2 (2024): 31–49. (Crossref)
Arboleda Lopez, Adriana P., Catherin Ramirez Arango, Grecia S. Mancipe Vanegas, Luis F. Garces Giraldo, and Sebasti Arboleda Cardona. “The Extrajudicial Virtual Conciliation in Law: Reflections on Ethics.” Justicia 23, no. 34 (2018): 372–84. (Crossref)
Arinze-Umobi, Chinemelum, and Ifeanyi T. Okonkwo. “Alternative Dispute Resolution Practice in Nigeria and the Effect of Covid-19 Pandemic.” International Journal of Law and Clinical Legal Education 2, no. 1 (2021): 82–5.
Ayush. “Mediation: Its Future Perspective in India.” Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research 2, no. 1 (2021): 1–17.
de Azevedo Sanches, Arantcha, Inara A.P. Silva, Andreia C. Bugalho, and Jair A. Cardoso. “A Tecnologia como Ferramenta de Acesso a Justica: Conciliacao Online e sua Aplicabilidade no. Campo Juridico.” Anais do IX Congresso Brasileiro de Processo Coletivo e Cidadania, no. 9 (2021): 526–47.
Bateson, David. “Virtual Arbitration: The Impact of Covid-19.” Indian Journal of Arbitration Law 9, no. 1 (2020): 159–69.
Bello, Temitayo, and Tolulope Adeosun. “Arbitral Proceedings Configuration and Covid-19 Pandemic: Evaluation of Success and Shortcomings – Europe, USA and Canada.” SSRN Electronic Journal 1, no. 1 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4137570. (Crossref)
Bessa, Adriana D., and Alaide C.L. Nascimento. “Efetividade das audiencias de mediacao e conciliacao online.” Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciencias e Educacao 9, no. 11 (2023): 3140–54. (Crossref)
Bezerra, Bruna V. O., Lucas G.D. Neris, and Jose A. Bezerra Junior. “Judiciario e Pandemia da Covid-19: uma analise a luz das atividades de conciliacao e dos dados estatisticos referentes ao Tribunal de Justica do Rio Grande do Norte.” Revista Juridica Luso-Brasileira 8, no. 6 (2022): 253–86.
Bhushan, Tripti. “The Impact of Digital Technologies on Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution 5, no. 10 (2023): 329–52. (Crossref)
Borba, Livia L.O., Fabricio C. Lunardi, and Tomas A. Guimaraes. “Judge’s Managerial Competences: A Case Study in a High-Performance Court.” Revista Direito GV 20 (2024): 1–23. (Crossref)
Cameron, Christopher D.R. “Virtually the Same? Videoconference Arbitrations and Some Myths and Ethics about Conducting Them.” ABA Journal of Labor & Employment 3, no. 1 (2021): 479–94.
Cavalcante, Marcus V.C., and Joselito S. Abrantes. “Inovacoes tecnologicas em audiencias de conciliacao: a utilizacao da videoconferencia no ambito do TJAP.” Revista Cientifica Multidisciplinar do CEAP 3, no. 1 (2021): 1–9.
Chatterjee, Subham. “Virtual Hearing Platform: The Use of Technology to Ensure Access to Justice.” International Journal of Law Management & Human 5, no. 5 (2022): 503–13.
Conselho Nacional de Justica. “Recomendacao n. 101/2021, do CNJ: Recomenda aos tribunais brasileiros a adocao de medidas especificas para o fim de garantir o acesso a Justica aos excluidos digitais.” Brasil, 2021. Accessed March 10, 2025. https://atos.cnj.jus.br/atos/detalhar/4036.
Correia, Pedro M.A.R., Maria B. Sousa, Sandra P.M. Pereira, and Fabricio C. Lunardi. “User-Centric Approach: Investigating Satisfaction with Portuguese Justice Services.” Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas 14, no. 2 (2024): 439–63. (Crossref)
Costa, Juliana de Castro. “A virtualizacao do acesso a justica: uma visao sobre o impacto das audiencias de conciliacao por videoconferencia durante a pandemia da Covid-19 no ambito do Tribunal de Justica do Distrito Federal e dos Territorios.” Undergraduate diss., Centro Universitario do Planalto Central Apparecido dos Santos, 2021.
de Costa, Rafael L. “Audiencias virtuais e sua influencia na governanca judicial.” MA diss., Escola Nacional de Formacao e Aperfeicoamento de Magistrados, 2023.
de Costa, Rafael L., Fabricio C. Lunardi, and Tomas de Aquino Guimaraes. “Audiencias Virtuais e Governanca Judicial: Acesso a Justica e Desempenho do Judiciario.” In Acesso a justica: pesquisas, politicas publicas e boas praticas, edited by Fabricio C. Lunardi, Tomas de Aquino Guimaraes, and Eloisa G. Da Silva Torlig, 189–214. Sao Paulo: Thomson Reuters Brasil, 2024.
Costa, Valda P., and Vanessa P. Costa. “O acesso a justica durante pandemia de COVID-19: Uma analise dos atos normativos expedidos pelo CNJ e TJTO no contexto das audiencias de conciliacao.” Revista Humanidades e Inovacao 9, no. 6 (2022): 84–92.
Dias, Paulo C., and Heitor M. de Oliveira. “As sessoes de conciliacao de mediacao virtuais: um breve ensaio sobre a ampliacao do acesso a justica.” Revista Direito UNIFACS – Debate Virtual 269, no. 1 (2022): 1–15.
Dixon, Susan A. “Virtual Courtrooms: Technical and Jurisprudential Challenges and Solutions – Lessons Learned by the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales.” Environmental and Planning Law Journal 39, no. 4 (2023): 321–8.
Exon, Susan N., and Soomi Leet. “Building Trust Online: The Realities of Telepresence for Mediators Engaged in Online Dispute Resolution.” Stetson Law Review 49, no. 1 (2019). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3403279.
Farias, James M.A. “O Uso de Meios Eletronicos pelo Direito Processual Brasileiro Durante a Pandemia da Covid-19.” Revista de Ciencias Juridicas e Sociais 1, no. 1 (2020): 96–103. (Crossref)
de Freitas, Luiz O.R., Fabricio C. Lunardi, and Pedro M.A.R. Correia. “Liberdade de Expressao na Era Digital: Novos Intermediarios e Censura por Atores Privados.” Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais 11, no. 2 (2024): 1–22. (Crossref)
Galvao, Maria C.B., and Ivan L.M. Ricarte. “Revisao Sistematica da Literatura: Conceituacao, Producao e Publicacao.” Logeion: Filosofia da Informacao 6, no. 1 (2019): 57–73. (Crossref)
Gomez-Moreno, Juan P. “Advocacy for Online Proceedings: Features of the Digital World and Their Role in How Communication Is Shaped in Remote International Arbitration.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 37 (2024): 865–85. (Crossref)
Goyal, Unnaty, and Aaryushi Goyal. “The Evolution and Effectiveness of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Platforms: A Comprehensive Analysis of ADR in the Digital Age.” Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law 3, no. 5 (2023): 1–26.
Gregorio, Daniely C. da Silva, and Rodrigo V.G. Teixeira. “Analise critica quanto a virtualizacao das audiencias de conciliacao e de mediacao no ambito do Poder Judiciario e os seus reflexos na garantia dos direitos de personalidade.” Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) 16, no. 1 (2024): 1–16. (Crossref)
Gregory, John D. “Current Practices of Online Dispute Resolution: The Canadian Experience.” E-Commerce and ODR: Current Status and Prospects in the Region 16, no. 1 (2012): 1–12. (Crossref)
Gross, Jill. “Post-Pandemic FINRA Arbitration: To Zoom or not to Zoom?.” Stetson Law Review 52 (2022). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4369697. (Crossref)
Horton, David. “Forced Remote Arbitration.” Cornell Law Review 108, no. 137 (2022). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4035835. (Crossref)
Iannarone, Nicole G. “A Model for Post-Pandemic Remote Arbitration?.” Stetson Law Review 52 (2023). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4430153.
Kaur, Manjit. “Reform of Civil Procedure in Italy: The Purpose of Lawmakers.” Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research 5, no. 2 (2023): 1–10.
Kluss, Katrina J. “Mediation Mediums: The Benefits and Burdens of Online Alternative Dispute Resolution in Australia.” Australian Alternative Dispute Resolution Law Bulletin 1, no. 1 (2008): 1–8.
Koh, Harold. “The ‘Gants Principles’ for Online Dispute Resolution: Realizing the Chief Justice’s Vision for Courts in the Cloud.” Boston College Law Review 62, no. 1 (2021): 2768–94.
Lindsey, Jaime. “Open Justice, Participation and Materiality: Virtual Hearings and the Court of Protection.” In Covid-19, Law and Human Rights: Essex Dialogues, edited by Carla Ferstman and Andrew Fagan, 257–64. Colchester: University of Essex, 2020.
Martins, Dayse B., and Iara A. de Holanda. “Audiencias Online em Tempo de Pandemia de Covid-19 no Ambito do TJ-CE.” Revista Eletronica de Direito do Centro Universitario Newton Paiva 42, no. 1 (2020): 377–95.
de Melo, Luiz G.S.V., Witalo B.M. Acioli, Natali D. da Silva, and Marcos A.F.S. Junior. “A mediacao e a conciliacao como ferramentas para diminuir a morosidade nas resolucoes dos litigios: uma analise a luz do principio do acesso a justica.” Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFOR 11, no. 2 (2020): 181–99. (Crossref)
Mello, Jackeline C. “Aplicabilidade da mediacao e da conciliacao no metaverso: uma analise a luz da advocacia 5.0.” Trabalho de Conclusao de Curso de Direito, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, 2022.
Middha, Megha, and Aseem C. Paliwal. “Access to Justice During COVID-19 Challenges and Issues Created by a Virus.” In Recent Developments in Machine and Human Intelligence, edited by S. Suman Rajest, Bhopendra Singh, Ahmed J. Obaid, R. Regin, and Karthikeyan Chinnusamy, 49–63. Hershey: IGI Global, 2023. (Crossref)
Mishra, Ashutosh. “Online Mediation: Prospects and Challenges in India.” International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education 14, no. 2 (2022): 10054–9. (Crossref)
Mol, Ana L.R., and Joao P.S. Rodrigues. “O Paradoxo das Novas Tecnologias e as Audiencias Virtuais de Conciliacao dos Juizados Especiais Civeis: Uma Analise Acerca dos Impactos da Lei no 13.994/2020 sobre as Garantias do Contraditorio e da Ampla Defesa.” In Anais do III Seminario Internacional em Direitos Humanos e Sociedade, vol. 3, 1–17. Criciuma, 2021.
de Moraes, Beatriz F., Fabricio C. Lunardi, and Pedro Correia. “Digital Access to Judicial Services in the Brazilian Amazon: Barriers and Potential.” Social Sciences 13, no. 2 (2024): 1–17. (Crossref)
Moura, Gisele L.S., and Simone C. Dufloth. “Politica autocompositiva: camaras privadas no cenario nacional.” Revista Direito GV 20 (2024): 1–25. (Crossref)
Oliveira, Antonio M., Ricardo L.D. Pedro, Pedro M.A.R. Correia, and Fabricio C. Lunardi. “An Overview of the Portuguese Electronic Jurisdictional Administrative Procedure.” Laws 12, no. 5 (2023): 1–24. (Crossref)
Oliveira, Heitor M., and Paulo C. Dias. “Audiencias de conciliacao e mediacao por videoconferencia no Estado de Sao Paulo: Beneficios e desvantagens segundo relatos empiricos dos conciliadores e mediadores judiciais.” Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution 4, no. 8 (2022): 147–86.
de Paula, Hanna T., and Maria E.S. Nascimento. “A Possibilidade da Continuidade de Audiencias de Conciliacao Judicial Telepresencial no Periodo Pos-Pandemia.” In Anais do V Encontro de Pesquisas Judiciarias da Escola Superior da Magistratura do Estado de Alagoas, 380–99. Maceio, 2020.
Ramos, Manoel F. Pensando convergencias entre a meta 9 do CNJ e o ODS 16 da Agenda 2030: um estudo sobre a tecnologia a servico da consensualidade no acesso a Justica. MA diss., Universidade Federal do Maranhao, 2023.
Rooney, Kim M. “The Global Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Commercial Dispute Resolution in the First Seven Months.” DRI Speedread 14, no. 1 (2020): 83–192.
Sa, Alexander R., Andre B.F. Negreiros, Maria D.B.A. Monteiro, and Elke C.B. Lima. “Effectiveness of Mediation and Conciliation in Extrajudicial Services as an Effective Means in Resolution of Disputes.” In Methodology Focused on the Area of Interdisciplinarity, 1–28. Sao Jose dos Pinhais: Seven Publicacoes, 2023. (Crossref)
Schmitz, Amy J. “Arbitration in the Age of COVID: Examining Arbitration’s Move Online.” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 22 (2021): 245–78.
Sharad, Dave, and Siddharth Misrab. “An Analysis of Online Dispute Resolution in India with Special Emphasis on the Impact of Covid-19: Opportunities and Obstacles.” Jus Corpus Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2023): 507–21.
Shawani, Megha, and Shubhangi Tiwari. “Impact of Covid-19 on Arbitration Proceedings: Online Dispute Resolution a Way Forward.” Supremo Amicus 19, no. 1 (2020): 1–7.
Silva, Francicleide B., Jean P. Silva, and Ana P.C. Sales. “A Mediacao como Contribuicao para o Desafogamento do Judiciario.” Revista Mangaio Academico 8, no. 5 (2023): 223–38.
da Silva, Michel B. A Audiencia Telepresencial e a Seguranca Juridica no Processo do Trabalho. MA diss., Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo, 2022.
Silva, Pedro D.D., Ana C. de Morais Garcia, Juliana R. da Silva, Lucyana L. Rodrigues Barbosa, Mariana Franca, and Wemerson N. da Cruz. “The Virtualization of the Hearing and Its Consequences in the Context of Civil Procedure Regarding Speed and Monetary Economy.” Seven Editora 17, no. 1 (2023): 2–10. (Crossref)
Smyth, Bruce M., Lawrence J. Moloney, Jacqueline M. Brady, Judge J. Harman, and Marian Esler. “COVID-19 in Australia: Impacts on Separated Families, Family Law Professionals, and Family Courts.” Family Court Review 58, no. 4 (2020): 1022–39. (Crossref)
Soares, Carlos H., and Lucelia de Sena Alves. “Audiencia Telepresencial e Devido Processo Constitucional.” Revista Etica, Direitos e Nosso Humanismo 5, no. 8 (2020): 301–30. (Crossref)
Sourdin, Tania, and John Zeleznikow. “Courts, Mediation and Covid-19.” Australian Business Law Review 8, no. 1 (2020): 1–30. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3595910. (Crossref)
Spengler, Fabiana M., Humberto D.B. de Pinho. “A mediacao digital de conflitos como politica judiciaria de acesso a justica no Brasil.” Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG 72 (2018): 219–58.
Tartuce, Fernanda, and Debora Brandao. “Mediacao e Conciliacao On-line, Vulnerabilidade Cibernetica e Destaques do Ato Normativo no 1/2020 do NUPEMEC/SP.”Cadernos Juridicos 21, no. 55 (2020): 153–62.
Thornburg, Elizabeth G. “Observing Online Courts: Lessons from the Pandemic.” Family Law Quarterly 54, no. 3 (2021): 181–244.
Torlig, Eloisa, Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes, and Fabricio C. Lunardi. “Access to Justice: An Epistemological Guide for Future Research.” Lex Humana 15, no. 3 (2023): 205–24.
United Nations. “Digital Exclusion.” Accessed October 1, 2024. https://www.un.org/techenvoy/sites/www.un.org.techenvoy/files/general/Definition_Digital-Inclusion.pdf.
Vitale, Carla M.F.L., Ricardo M.F. Soares, and Luciana de Aboim Machado. “Aplicacao da Mediacao de Conflitos no Ambiente Virtual: Desafios e Possibilidades.” Revista Direito UNIFACS – Debate Virtual 281, no. 1 (2023): 1–15.
Zein, Tala. “Virtual Hearings in Arbitration.” Journal of Legal Studies 2022, no. 13 (2023): 2–10. (Crossref)
ENFAM—National School for the Training and Improvement of Magistrates https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6648-1081
ENFAM—National School for the Training and Improvement of Magistrates https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9512-8394
University of Coimbra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3111-9843







