Gloss on the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 9 November 2023, Staatsanwaltschaft Aachen, C-819/21
Marek Ryszard Smarzewski
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0910-9128
Abstract
The subject of considerations undertaken in the paper is the judgment of CJEU of 9 November 2023, Staatsanwaltschaft Aachen, C-819/21. The commented judgment was issued in response to preliminary questions submitted by the Landgericht Aachen (Regional Court, Aachen). It primarily addresses the possibility to recognise and enforce a custodial sentence by a court of the executing state if there are grounds to believe that the conditions in the issuing state – at the time of the judgment to be enforced or subsequent judgments concerning it – are inconsistent with the fundamental right to a fair trial, in particular because the judicial system in the Member State in question has been found to be incompatible with the rule of law and has a specific, adverse effect on the convicted person in the proceedings. CJEU ruled that the application of an exceptional ground for refusal not expressly regulated in FD 2008/909 is possible after conducting two-step test developed in CJEU’s case law with respect to the procedure for enforcing an EAW. This position of CJEU does not deserve uncritical approval, even though it is essentially consistent with the CJEU’s approach to the significance of abstract and concrete deficiencies relating to fundamental rights, including those affecting the right to a fair trial, in relation to the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and the exceptional possibility of derogation from it. The solution developed in the judgment of 9 November 2023 fails to take into account the fundamental differences between the EAW procedure and that set out in FD 2008/909 and raises doubts as to its functionality.
Keywords:
Transfer of the penalty of imprisonment, two-stage test, refusal to recognise and execute the judgment, Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA, mutual recognitionReferences
Augustyniak, Barbara. 2025. „Komentarz do art. 611(tk) Kodeksu postępowania karnego”, In: Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz aktualizowany, vol. II, ed. Dariusz Świecki, LEX/el.
Górski, Adam. 2025. „Komentarz do art. 611tk Kodeksu postępowania karnego”, In: Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, ed. Andrzej Sakowicz, Warsaw: C.H. Beck, Legalis.
Montaldo, Stefano. 2020. „Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA and Fundamental Rights Concerns: In Search of Appropriate Remedies”, In: The Transfer of Prisoners in the European Union. Challenges and Prospects in the Implementation of Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA, ed. Stefano Montaldo, 37-60. Hague: Eleven International Publishing/G. Giappichelli Editore.
Montaldo, Stefano. 2022. „Intersection among EU judicial cooperation instruments and the quest for an advanced and consistent European judicial space: The case of the transfer and surrender of convicts in the EU”. „New Journal of European Criminal Law” 13(3): 252-269.
O’Neill, Ruairi. 2025. „Defending Judicial Independence in Court: A Subjective Right to Independence in EU Law”, Liverpool Law Review 46: 65-84.
„Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 4 May 2023. Case C-819/21. Staatsanwaltschaft Aachen”, ECLI:EU:C:2023:386.
Ouwerkerk, Jannemieke. 2024. „The Missing Link in CJEU Staatsanwaltschaft Aachen (C-891/21) and the Argument for Humanitarian Considerations in Prison Transfer Proceedings”. „European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice” 32: 181-195.
Partyk, Tomasz. 2023. „Systemowe problemy sądownictwa to nie konkretne wyroki. Omówienie wyroku TS z dnia 9 listopada 2023 r., C-819/21 (Staatsanwaltschaft Aachen)”. LEX.
Rosanò, Alessandro. 2023. „Staatsanwaltschaft Aachen, ovvero la tutela dei diritti fondamentali sulla base del test LM nelle procedure di transferimento interstatale di detenuti”, European Papers 8(3): 1105-1120.
Smarzewski, Marek. 2025. „Przejęcie i przekazanie kary pozbawienia wolności do wykonania na podstawie decyzji ramowej Rady 2008/909/WSiSW”, In: System Prawa Karnego Procesowego. Vol. XVIII. Współpraca międzynarodowa w sprawach karnych, ed. Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek, 1102-1161. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0910-9128
