SEARCHING FOR A NEW RATIONALE FOR COMPENSATING LOSS OF A CHANCE IN POLISH TORT LAW. LESSONS TO BE LEARNED FROM ENGLAND AND WALES

Piotr Sitnik

City Law School, City, University of London , Poland


Abstract

The question of compensation of loss of a chance is relatively rarely debated in the Polish doctrine of the law of tort. One reason for such a state of affairs may be the virtually unanimous opinion of both courts and academic comment-ators with regard to the permissibility of granting damages for loss of a chance of obtaining a benefit – loss of a chance, traditionally defined as potential harm, does not give rise to damages and falls beyond the scope of Article 361 § 2 of the Polish Civil Code. The paper attempts to show, by reference to the latest experiences of common law jurisdictions, that there exist rational bases for an extension of the notion of harm so that it encompasses loss of a chance where a potential acquisition of a benefit is contingent upon an action of a third party or force majeure, on which the victim has no bearing, subject to the caveat that the victim put an effort into generating the chance in question. In the course of the analysis an attempt will be made to demonstrate, with reference to a selec-tion of factual scenarios considered by Polish courts, that it would be possible to achieve fairer results (whilst avoiding placing unfair compensatory burdens upon the other party) to recognize liability for loss of a chance where the victim put a significant effort into making the chance viable, material, and where, based on ordinary life experience, materialization of such a chance may be considered a natural course of events.

Keywords:

loss of a chance, compensation, causation, potential harm

Bagińska, Ewa. 2015. „Kompensacja utraconej szansy – problem związku przyczynowego czy szkody?”. [in:] Współczesne problemy prawa zobowiązań, (ed.) J. Haberko, A. Olejniczak, A. Pyrzyńska, D. Sokołowska. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.

Chen-Wishart, Mindy. 2015. Contract Law. Oxford: OUP.

Czachórski, Witold. 2003. Zobowiązania – zarys wykładu. Warszawa: LexisNexis.

Fordham, Margaret. 2005. “Loss of Chance – a Lost Opportunity?”. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies.

Gardner, John. 2004. “The Wrongdoing that Gets Results”. Philosophical Perspectives 18.

Green, Sarah. 2015. Causation in Negligence. London: Bloomsbury.

Grzebyk, Patrycja. 2007. „Rekompensata utraty szansy”. [in:] Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza, (ed.) J. Jastrzębski. Warszawa: CH Beck 2007.

Harpwood, Vivienne. 2005. Modern Tort Law. Hove: Psychology Press.

Honore, Antony M. 1988. “Responsibility and Luck”. Law Quarterly Review 104.

Kaliński, Maciej. 2009. „Glosa do wyroku SN z dnia 28 maja 2008 r., II CSK 35/08”. Glosa 3.

Kaliński, Maciej. 2014. Szkoda na mieniu i jej naprawienie. Warszawa: CH Beck.

Karaszewski, Grzegorz. 2014. „Art. 361”. [in:] Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, (ed.) J. Ciszewski. Warszawa: LexisNexis.

Khoury, Lara. 2006. Uncertain Causation in Medical Liability. London: Blooms-bury.

Koch, Andrzej. 1975. Związek przyczynowy jako podstawa odpowiedzialności odszkodowawczej w prawie cywilnym. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydaw. Naukowe.

Koziol, Helmut. 2007. “Comparative Report”. In: Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Digest of European Tort Law), ed. B. Winiger, H. Koziol, B.A. Koch, R. Zimmermann. Berlin: Springer.

Laleng, Per. 2011. „Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd. And Willmore v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council: A Material Contribution to Uncertainty?”. Modern Law Review 74(5):777-793.

McIvor, Claire. 2013. “Debunking some judicial myths about epidemiology and its relevance to UK tort law”. Medical Law Review 21(4).

Miller, Chris. “Gregg v. Scott: loss of chance revisited”. Law, Probability and Risk 4.

Morgan, Jonathan. 2003. “Lost Causes in the House of Lords: Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services”. Modern Law Review 66:277-284.

Nesterowicz, Mirosław. 2004. Prawo medyczne. Toruń: Dom Organizatora TNOiK.

Olejniczak, Adam. 2014. „Art. 361”. [in:] Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz LEX. Tom III. Zobowiązania. Część ogólna, (ed.) A. Kidyba. Warszawa: LEX.

Sobolewski, Przemysław. 2017. „Art. 361”. [in:] Tom III A. Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz. Zobowiązania. Część ogólna, (ed.) K. Osajda. Warszawa: CH Beck.

Steel, Sandy. 2015. Proof Causation in Tort Law. Cambridge: CUP.

Szpunar, Adam. 1975. Ustalenie odszkodowania w prawie cywilnym. Warszawa : Wydawnictwo Prawnicze.

Thomson, Joe. 2006. “Barker v Corus: Fairchild Chickens come home to roost”. Edinburgh Law Review 10:421-426.

Waldron, Jeremy. 1995. “Moments of Carelessness and Massive Loss”. [in:] Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law, ed. D. Owen. Oxford: OUP.

Wishart, Gordon C., Andrew Axon. 2013. “Proof of causation: a new approach in cancer cases”. Clinical Risk 19(6).

Van den Heever, Pat. 2007. The Application of the Doctrine of a Loss of a Chance to Recover in Medical Law. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press.

Zagrobelny, Krzysztof. 2017. „Art. 361”. [in:] Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, (ed.) E. Gniewek. Warszawa: CH Beck 2017.
Download

Published
2017-09-15


Sitnik, P. (2017). SEARCHING FOR A NEW RATIONALE FOR COMPENSATING LOSS OF A CHANCE IN POLISH TORT LAW. LESSONS TO BE LEARNED FROM ENGLAND AND WALES. Review of European and Comparative Law, 30(3), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.4164

Piotr Sitnik  Piotr.Sitnik@city.ac.uk
City Law School, City, University of London