The European Citizens’ Initiative Reform: Does it Matter?
Agnieszka Parol
Faculty of Law, Canon Law and Administration, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4354-680X
Abstract
The reform of the entered into force at the beginning of 2020. The changes are intended to popularize and to give effect to the ECI, especially through the strengthening of the position of this tool as an instrument of e-democracy and the reinforcing of the principle of subsidiarity and the model of multi-level governance. The reform is a step in the right direction, however, it is rather unlikely that it could boost the ECI as an instrument of indirect legislative initiative, which so far has had little impact. The sheer scale of this issue can be illustrated by the juxtaposition of the over seventy registered ECIs with the merely two initiatives in which the EC decided to follow up with legislative proposals. Such a situation results from the fact that the ECI is treated as a subsidiary tool to the instruments of representative democracy, generally accepted as the basis of the system. This is also the effect of the way the quasi-monopoly of the European Commission in the area of legislative initiative is interpreted. In consequence, the effectiveness of the ECI is currently perceived through the prism of collecting over one million signatures and conducting noncommittal dialogue. Nevertheless, in this context it should be remembered that the most effective form of encouraging the civil society to participate in political activity is to reinforce its agency. Indeed, increasing the impact of the ECI on decision-making processes is not dependent on potential changes in primary or secondary law. The change of attitude will suffice. Indeed, an increased number of legislative proposals stemming from the ECIs might be the result of a change in EU political culture and a greater respect for democratic rules.
Keywords:
European Citizens’ Initiative, indirect legislative initiative, participatory democracy, direct democracyReferences
2. Alexios Anagnostakis v. European Commission, case T-450/12, ECLI:EU:T:2015:739.
3. Athanasiadou Natassa, “The European Citizens’ Initiative:Lost in admissibility?", Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2(2019).
4. Balázs-Árpád Izsák and Attila Dabis v. European Commission, case T-529/13, ECLI:EU:T:2016:282.
5. Balázs-Árpád Izsák and Attila Dabis v. European Commission, case C-420/16, ECLI:EU:C:2019:177.
6. Barcz Jan, “Inicjatywa obywatelska - aspekty prawne i instytucjonalne”, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 10 (2011).
7. Bruno Costantini et al. v. European Commission, case T-44/14 ECLI:EU:T:2016:223.
8. Bürgerausschuss für die Bürgerinitiative Minority SafePack - one million signatures for diversity in Europe v. European Commission, case T-646/13, ECLI:EU:T:2017:59.
9. Commission Decision (EU) 2017/652 of 29 March 2017 on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled ‘Minority SafePack — one million signatures for diversity in Europe’, (O.J. L 92 z 6.4.2017, p. 100).
10. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1179/2011 of 17 November 2011 laying down technical specifications for online collection systems pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the citizens’ initiative (O.J. L 301, 18.11.2011, p. 3).
11. Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities, (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, 1).
12. Craig Paul, The Lisbon Treaty. Law, Politics, and Treaty Reform, UOP Oxford 2010.
13. Cuesta-López Victor, “A Preliminary Approach to the Regulation on European Citizens’ Initiative from Comparative Constitutional Law”, Bruges Political Research Papers / Cahiers de recherche politique de Bruges No 24 / February 2012, 8, https://www.coleurope.eu.
14. European Citizens' Initiative One of Us et al. v. European Commission, case T-561/14, ECLI:EU:T:2018:210.
15. G. Schwarze v. Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel, case 16/65, ECLI:EU:C:1965:117.
16. Głogowski Paweł, “European Citizens’ Initiative in Central and Eastern European Countries – The Bumpy Road of Participatory Democracy in the EU”, Studia Europejskie 1(2017).
17. Głogowski Paweł, Maurer Andreas, “The European Citizens‘ Initiative – Chances, Constraints and Limits”, Political Science Series, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna 2013.
18. HB et al. European Commission, case T-361/14, ECLI:EU:T:2017:252.
19. Juncker Jean-Claude, A new start for Europe:My agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_14_546.
20. Karatzia Anastasia, “The European Citizens' Initiative and the EU Institutional Balance:On Realism and the Possibilities of Affecting EU lawmaking”, Common Market Law Review (1)2017.
21. Kubin Tomasz, “Znaczenie europejskiej inicjatywy obywatelskiej w kontekście deficytu demokracji w Unii Europejskiej”, Politeja 54(2018).
22. Longo Eric, “The European Citizens’ initiative:too much democracy for EU policy?”, German Law Journal 20(2019).
23. Mendes Joana, “Participation and the Role of Law after Lisbon:A Legal View on Article 11 TEU”, Common Market Law Review 6(2011).
24. Michael Efler et al. v. European Commission, case T-754/14, ECLI:EU:T:2017:323.
25. Opinion of Advocate General Michał Bobek presented on 29 July 2019, ECLI:EU:C:2019:640.
26. Organ James, “Decommissioning Direct Democracy? A Critical Analysis of Commission Decision-Making on the Legal Admissibility of European Citizens Initiative Proposals”, European Constitutional Law Review 10(2014).
27. Patrick Grégor Puppinck et al. v. European Commission, case C-418/18 P, ECLI:EU:C:2019:1113.
28. Petrescu Oana - Mariuca, “The European Citizens' Initiative:a Useful Instrument for Society and for Citizens?”, Revista Chilena de Derecho 3(2014).
29. Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast), COM(2017) 753.
30. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon 2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020), COM(2011) 809.
31. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and sustainability of EU risk assessment in the food chain (…),COM (2018) 179.
32. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the citizens' initiative, COM (2010)119.
33. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European citizens’ initiative, COM (2017) 482.
34. Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation, (OJ L 378, 27.12.2006, 41).
35. Regulation (EU) 2019/1381 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain (…), (OJ L 231, 6.9.2019, p. 1).
36. Regulation (EU) 2019/788 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the European citizens' initiative, (O.J. L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 55).
37. Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on the citizens’ initiative (O.J. L 65, 11.3.2011, p. 1).
38. Report on the application of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 on the citizens' initiative, Brussels, 28.3.2018, COM(2018)157.
39. Romania v. Commission, case C-899/19 P (ongoing).
40. Romania v. European Commission, case T391 / 17, ECLI:EU:T:2019:672.
41. Sadurski Wojciech, “Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union:a Diagnosis and Some Modest Proposals”, XXXII Polish Yearbook of International Law 2012.
42. Śledzińska-Simon Anna, „Obywatelstwo Unii Europejskiej jako demos, czyli fiasko demokratycznego telos?”, in:Ochrona praw obywatelek i obywateli Unii Europejskiej. 20 lat - osiągnięcia i wyzwania na przyszłość, ed. Adam Bodnar, ed. Grażyna Baranowska, ed. Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Warszawa:Wolters Kluwer 2015.
43. Treaty on the European Union, (O.J. C 202, 7.06.2016, p. 13, consolidated version).
Faculty of Law, Canon Law and Administration, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4354-680X
