The Scope of the Employee’s Right to Allowed Public Criticism of the Supervisor. Gloss to the Judgment of the Supreme Court of August 28, 2013, I PK 48/13. Critical Voice
Łucja Kobroń-Gąsiorowska
Pedagogical University of Krakow , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-452X
Abstract
This gloss discusses the position of the Supreme Court adopted in the judgment of August 28, 2013, I PK 48/13. The main thesis of the Court concerned the employee’s possibility of allowed public criticism of the supervisor, i.e. the right to whistleblowing, which is the disclosure of irregularities in the functioning of the workplace consisting in various types of acts of dishonesty, unfairness involving the employer or its representatives, when this does not lead to a breach of the employee’s duties consisting, in particular, in caring for the interests of the workplace and maintaining the confidentiality of information, the disclosure of which could cause damage to the employer (duty of loyalty; not to infringe the employer’s interests – Article 100 § 2 (4) of the Polish Labor Code. The Supreme Court’s lack of consistency in its ruling between informing the public about irregularities in the workplace and the employee’s duty of loyalty provides for even more doubts on the part of employees wishing to report irregularities. In the author’s opinion, the position taken in the case does not explain when loyalty is binding on the employee. The Supreme Court duplicated the lack of consistency in subsequent rulings, e.g. of May 10, 2018.
Keywords:
the right to fair criticism of the employer, disclosure of irregularities, whistleblowing, duty of loyalty, employer's interestReferences
Bowie, Norman. Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1982.
Bowie, Norman, and Ronald Duska. Business ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1992.
Dral, Antoni. Powszechna ochrona trwałości stosunku pracy. Tendencje zmian. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2009.
Florek, Ludwik. “Ochrona przed wypowiedzeniem w prawie pracy Republiki Federalnej Niemiec.” In Prawo pracy państw obcych, edited by Maria Matey, vol. II (Wrocław: Ossolineum, 1985).
Latos-Miłkowska, Monika. “Kształt powszechnej ochrony przed wypowiedzeniem we współczesnym prawie pracy.” Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne, no. 10 (2008): 11 et seq.
Matey, Maria. “Prawo do pracy.” In Prawa człowieka. Model prawny, edited by Roman Wieruszewski. Wrocław-Kraków-Warsaw: Ossolineum, 1991.
Rycak, Artur. Powszechna ochrona trwałości stosunku pracy. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska, 2013.
Szewczyk, Helena. “Ochrona trwałości zatrudnienia w gospodarce rynkowej (wybrane zagadnienia).” In Studia z prawa pracy. Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Docenta Jerzego Logi, edited by Zbigniew Góral. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2007.
Walas, Antoni. “Prawna ochrona trwałości stosunku pracy.” Państwo i Prawo, no. 5–6 (1961).
Walas, Antoni. “Prawo wypowiedzenia umowy o pracę.” Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Rozprawy i Studia 42, (1961).
Pedagogical University of Krakow https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-452X
