When a State Is a Party to a Dispute – (Court-)Administrative Mediation in Poland and in Ukraine (A Comparative Perspective)
Anna Kalisz
UMCS , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-0067
Alina Serhieieva
Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University of Kharkiv , Lithuaniahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-4062
Abstract
Ukraine’s status as a candidate country for the European Union membership reinforces the need for comparative analysis between Ukrainian regulations and the laws of other EU Member States, as well as European regulations. One of the fields of comparative law is the development of mediation as a legal institution, also in cases when the state is involved – for disputes covered by administrative law. This has already been a subject of interest and promotion of both the EU and the Council of Europe, as European standards of democracy provide for the state’s cooperation with citizens/individuals. The aim of this article is – firstly – to compare the current development of mediation in administrative and court-administrative cases in Poland and in Ukraine, the similarities in successes and challenges, and – secondly – to determine to what extent both countries follow the latest CEPEJ guidelines. Although
References
“Vinnytsia District Administrative Court.” Accessed March 10, 2023, http://voas. gov.ua/work/medats-ya/med-ats-ya-efektivne-vir-shennya-konfl-kt-v.
Federczyk, Wojciech. Mediacja w postępowaniu administracyjnym i sądowo administracyjnym. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2013.
Gmurzyńska, Ewa, and Rafał Morek, eds. Mediacja. Teoria i praktyka. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2014.
Judiciary of Ukraine. “Mediation Week in the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeals.” Accessed March 10, 2023. https://apladm.dn.court.gov.ua/sud9102/pres-centr/news/3889.
Kalisz, Anna, and Adam Zienkiewicz. Mediacja sądowa i pozasądowa. Zarys wykładu. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2014.
Kalisz, Anna. „Mediacja administracyjna i sądowoadministracyjna,” Państwo i Prawo, no. 2 (March 2018): 19–39.
Kalisz, Anna. Mediacja jako forma dialogu w stosowaniu prawa. Warsaw: Difin, 2016.
Kyselova, Tatiana. Integration of Mediation into Ukrainian Court System: Policy Pa- per (October 17, 2017). Council of Europe, Kyiv, 2017. (Crossref)
Maan, Bert, Remco van Rhee, Luiza Romanadze, Aliana Serhieieva, Svitlana Sergeyeva, and Volodymyr Rodchenko. “Mediation Gap Analysis Report.” Pravo-Justice. Accessed March 10, 2023. https://www.pravojustice.eu/storage/app/uploads/public/5f7/435/116/5f743511604ec221015187.pdf.
Mayer, Bernard. “Facilitative mediation.” In Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Methods, and Applications, edited by Jay Folberg, Ann L. Milne, and Peter Salem, 29–52. London: Routledge, 2004.
Mazaraki, Nataliya. “Mediation in Ukraine: problems of theory and practice.” Foreign Trade, Economics, Finance, Law 84, no. 1 (January 2016): 92–100.
Accessed June 16, 2023. http://journals.knute.edu.ua/foreign-trade/article/ view/533.
Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości. “Dane statystyczne dotyczące mediacji.” Accessed March 10, 2023. https://www.gov.pl/web/sprawiedliwosc/dane-statystyczne-dotyczace-mediacji.
Plucińska-Nowak, Martyna. Status i oblicza mediacji w społeczeństwie polskim. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM, 2021.
Płeszka, Krzysztof, Janina Czapska, Michał Araszkiewicz, and Michał Pękala. Mediacja. Teoria, normy, praktyka. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2017.
Rochowicz, Paweł. “Klapa mediacji, ale uproszczenia działają – resort rozwoju ocenia wprowadzone procedury.” Prawo.pl. Accessed March 10, 2023. https:// www.prawo.pl/samorzad/uproszczenia-procedur-administracyjnych-nie-zawsze-dzialaja,516368.html.
Rostovska, Karyna, Nataliia Hryshyna, Olesia Kaidash, and Marharyta Syromiatnikova. “Mediation as a Means to Resolve Administrative Disputes: An Appraisal of the Historical and Legal.” Journal of International Legal Communication 1, no. 1 (June 2021): 197–204. (Crossref)
Sydelnikov, Oleksander. “The Institution of conciliation of the parties in administrative proceedings.” Abstract of a dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Law. https://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/AVTOREF_2017/Sydielnikov_2017.pdf.
Tabernacka, Magdalena. Negocjacje i mediacje w sferze publicznej. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer, 2018.
Tatiana Tsuvina, “Introduction of the Institute of Court Mediation as a Promising Area for Reforming the Civil Procedure Legislation of Ukraine.” In Ukraine on the way to Europe: reform of civil procedural legislation. 36. scientific works. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Kyiv, 7 July 2017), edited by I.O. Izarova and R.Y. Khanyk-Pospolitak, 195–200. Kyiv: Dakor Publishing House, 2017. https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bit-stream/123456789/12731/1/Cuvina_195–200.pdf.
The Supreme Administrative Court. “Annual Reports.” Accessed March 10, 2023. http://www.nsa.gov.pl/sprawozdania-roczne.php.
The Supreme Administrative Court. “Centralna Baza Orzeczeń Sądów Administracyjnych.” Accessed March 10, 2023. https://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Tsuvina, Tatiana. “National Mechanisms of the Enforcement of Agreements Resulting from Mediation: EU Experience and Ukrainian Perspectives.” Problems of Legality, no. 158 (2022): 110–123. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-99 0X.158.264998. (Crossref)
United Nations. “UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Mediation and International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation, 2018.” Accessed March 10, 2023. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/mediation/model-law/commercial_conciliation.
Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University of Kharkiv https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-4062
