EU-Japan Agreements: Content, Context and Implications
Andżelika Kuźnar
Collegium of World Economy, Warsaw School of Economics , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7042-4592
Jerzy Brunon Menkes
Collegium of World Economy, Warsaw School of Economics , Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7744-8167
Abstract
The article analyses the agreements concluded by the EU with Japan: Economic Partnership Agreement, Strategic Partnership Agreementand the negotiated agreement: Investment Protection Agreement. EPA liberalizes trade in goods and services. By setting the legal framework for a strategic partnership, SPA facilitates cooperation against common challenges. IPA will regulate standards for investment protection and disputes resolution.
The analysis consists: – the content of the Agreements; – socio-economic and political potential of the parties; – EU’s legal powers to negotiate and conclude agreements, and its competence, whether exclusive or shared, to enter into these Agreements; – the importance of Agreements for their parties and for other international actors as well as for regional, trans-regional and global relations.
The thesis of the study is the statement that in a world where instability is increasing and security is reduced, the parties are fulfilling their, as real great powers, obligation to bear special responsibility for the implementation of the values represented. The Agreements confirm the community of values on which they are embedded and create conditions for strengthening these values.
The study consists of five parts. First we analyse the subject matter of the Agreements , then their actors, and the reasons of concluding them and why. In part IV \we explain the importance of the Agreements for the contracting parties and for the international community, and in part V we concentrate on the Agreements as seen from the external perspective.
The conclusions state that the Agreements institutionalise security communitywhere the security and defence policy component is still relatively weak, but is also being developed. The agreements making closer political and economic ties between the UE and Japan open the way to creation of the EU’s security community with “democratic diamonds” in the Asia–Pacific region.
Keywords:
EU, Japan, EPA, SPA, IPASupporting Agencies:
SGH w WarszawieReferences
Baker P., Trump Says NATO Allies Don’t Pay Their Share. Is That True? „The New York Times”, 26.05.2017. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/26/world/europe/nato-trump-spending.html (14.04.2018).
Cordesman A.H., President Trump’s New National Security Strategy, Center for Strategic & International Studies, 18.12.2017. Retrieved from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/president-trumps-new-national-security-strategy (19.03.2019).
Corong E. L., Hertel T. W., McDougall R., Tsigas M. E., van der Mensbrugghe D., The Standard GTAP Model, Version 7, “Journal of Global Economic Analysis”, 2017 Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 1–119.
Dasgupta R., The demise of the nation state, “The Guardian”, 05.04.2018. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/apr/05/demise-of-the-nation-state-rana-dasgupta (1.04.2019).
De Gucht K., Why we should open free trade negotiations with Japan. Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-562_en.htm?locale=en (10.03.2019)
Eyal J., Japan-India: An Alliance with a difference, “The Straits Time”, 07.11.2016. Retrieved from: http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/japan-india-an-alliance-with-a-difference (1.12.2017).
Felbermayr G., Kimura F., Okubo T., Steininger M., Yalcin E., On the Economics of an EU-Japan Free Trade Agreement, Study of the Ifo Institute on behalf of the Bertelsmann Foundation, Final Report on March 3, 2017.
Francois J., Manchin M., Norberg H., Economic impact assessment of an FTA between the EU and Japan, February 2011. Retrieved from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/july/tradoc_155782.pdf (15.03.2019).
Friedman T.L., The World is Flat. A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York 2005.
Fukuyama F., Liberal Democracy as a Global Phenomenon, “Political Science and Politics”, 1991, Vol. 24, No. 4.
Gaouette N., Tillerson raps China as 'predatory' rule breaker, “CNN Politics”, 19.10.2017. Retrieved from: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/18/politics/tillerson-china-rebuke-speech/index.html (1.12.2017).
Gregory J., Britain exploring membership of the TPP to boost trade after Brexit, “The Guardian”, 03.01.2018. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/03/britain-in-talks-to-join-the-tpp-to-boost-trade-after-brexit (18.04.2018).
Hamilton A., Concerning Dangers from Dissensions Between the States, “Federalist”, No 6. Retrieved from: https://www.congress.gov/resources/display/content/The+Federalist+Papers#TheFederalistPapers-6 (15.07.2018).
Hertel T.W. (ed.), Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York 1997.
Horn H., Mavroidis P. C., Sapir A., An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements, Bruegel Blueprint Series 2009, Vol. VII.
Hutt D., The 'Indo-Pacific' Vision: Room for Britain And France? “Forbes”, 14.11.2017. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhutt/2017/11/14/the-indo-pacific-vision-room-for-britain-and-france/ (18.04.2018).
Jaipragas B., Why is the US calling Asia-Pacific the Indo-Pacific? Donald Trump to ‘Clarify’, 07.11.2017. Retrieved from: http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/2118806/why-us-calling-asia-pacific-indo-pacific-trump-clarify (1.12.2017).
Kagan R., America’s Crisis of Legitimacy, “Foreign Affairs”, 2004, Vol. 83, No. 2, p. 65-87.
Kagan R., Of Paradise and Power. America and Europe in the New World Order, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2003.
Khanna P., The End of the Nation-State, “The New York Times”, 14.10.2013. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/13/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-the-nation-state.html (20.06.2018).
Khurana G.S., Security of Sea Lines: Prospects for India-Japan Cooperation, ”Strategic Analysis”, Jan-Feb 2007, Vol. 31, No. 1.
Layne Ch., Kant or Cant. The Myth of the Democratic Peace, “International Security”, 1994, Vol. 19, No. 2.
Lehmann J.-P., Engammare V., Beyond Economic Integration: European Lessons for Asia Pacific? “The Globalist”, 03.02.2014. Retrieved from: https://www.theglobalist.com/beyond-economic-integration-european-lessons-asia-pacific/ (13.03.2017).
Lieberthal K., The American Pivot to Asia, “Foreign Policy”, December 21, 2011.
Mansfield E.D., Solingen E., Regionalism, “Annual Review of Political Science”, 2010, Vol. 13, pp. 145-163.
Medcalf R., The Indo-Pacific. What’s in a Name? Brookings, October 2013. Retrieved from: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-indo-pacific-whats-in-a-name/ (16.06.2017).
Nye J. S., The U.S.-Japan Alliance. Getting Asia Right through 2020, CSIS, February 2007.
Nye Jr. J. S., Amerikas Macht (in:) Empire Amerika – Perspektiven einer neuen Weltordnung, eds. U. Speck, N. Sznaider, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, Stuttgart 2003.
Sanger D.E., Haberman M., Donald Trump sets conditions for defending NATO Allies against attack, “New York Times”, 20.07.2016. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/politics/donald-trump-issues.html (14.04.2018).
Singh S., WTO Plus Commitments in RTAs, Centre for WTO Studies, New Delhi 2014. Retrieved from: http://wtocentre.iift.ac.in/CBP/WTO%20Plus%20Commitments_Shailja.pdf (10.03.2018).
Siriwardana M., Yang J., GTAP Model Analysis of the Economic Effects of an Australia-China FTA: Welfare and Sectoral Aspects, “Global Economic Review”, 2008, Vol. 37, No. 3, p. 341–62.
Sunesen E.R, Francois J.F., Thelle M.H., Assessment of barriers to trade and investment between the EU and Japan. Final report, Copenhagen Economics 2010.
Suzuki K., Perspectives on an Uncertain World: Japan-EU Views on the United States and Russia, Instituto Affari Internationali Commentaries, 18, 21.03.2018. Retrieved from: https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/perspectives-uncertain-world-japan-eu-views-united-states-and-russia (20.06.2019).
Tongzon J. L., China’s Membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Exports of the Developing Economies of Viray P. L., US: We will not ignore China's challenge to rules-based order, “The Philippine Star”, 19.10.2017. Retrieved from: http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/10/19/1750399/us-we-will-not-ignore-chinas-challenge-rules-based-order (1.12.2017).
Wallerstein I., The Curve of American Power, “New Left Review”, 2006, no. 40, Retrieved from: http://www.iwallerstein.com/wp-content/uploads/ docs/NLRCURVE.PDF (10.05.2018).
Waltz K. N., Structural Realism after the Cold War, “International Security”, 2000, Vol. 25, No 1, Retrieved from: http://www.columbia.edu/itc/sipa/U6800/readings-sm/Waltz_Structural%20Realism.pdf (15.07.2018).
Webster Ch. (ed.), British Diplomacy 1813-1815. Selected Documents Dealing with the Reconciliation of Europe, London 1931.
What on earth is the CPTPP? “The Economist”, 12.03.2018. Retrieved from: https://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2018/03/economist-explains-8 (15.03.2019).
Collegium of World Economy, Warsaw School of Economics https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7042-4592
Collegium of World Economy, Warsaw School of Economics https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7744-8167
