Judicial Independence in Croatia Under European Scrutiny: Analysis of the Ruling Hann-Invest and Others (Or How to Save Judges from Other Judges)
Susana Sanz-Caballero
Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera , Spainhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-0300
Abstract
This contribution analyses the first case presented to the Court of Justice of the EU that questions the independence of the judiciary in Croatia. The case has several unique aspects. First, it addresses threats to judicial independence from within the judiciary itself, which is unusual, as most cases typically involve external pressures from the executive or legislative branches. Second, while the judicial practice under scrutiny was deemed contrary to EU law, interestingly the Court explained to Croatian authorities how they could rectify the situation. Third, the Advocate General’s Conclusions largely diverge from the Court’s ruling. While this is not so uncommon, it proves that this was not an easy case. Last, the case challenges and ultimately deems unjust a judicial practice that persists in Croatia as a remnant of the country’s communist past and which draws inspiration from an era when judges were subject to a strict judicial hierarchy to the detriment of their own autonomous opinion. The paper delves into the specifics of the Croatian case. It compares the legal reasoning of the Advocate General and that the Court of Justice, illustrating their differing approaches. The contribution explores other arguments that were not raised in the Conclusions that, interestingly, were included in the Court’s judgement. The Court ruled that Croatia’s practice – where a registrar judge, not involved in the case, could override a decision made by the court handling the case, and where an extended section of the court could also force the judges handling the case to give up their legal reasoning before they could even rule on the case – was incompatible with Article 19 TEU.
Keywords:
judicial independence, internal interference, rule of law decline, Croatia, Court of Justice of the European Union, European UnionSupporting Agencies:
This article was conducted within the framework of the project PID2021-126765NB-I00 of the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain.References
Bačić Selanec, Nika, and Petrić, Davor. “Internal Judicial Independence in the EU and Ghosts from the Socialist Past: Why the Court of Justice Should Not Follow AG Pikamäe in Hann Invest.” Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy 20, (2024): 155–79. (Crossref)
Bačić Selanec, Nika, and Petrić, Davor. “New Frontiers for Article 19(1) TEU: A Comment on Joined Cases C-554/21, C-622/21 and C-727/21 Hann-Invest.” Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy 20, (2024): 127–54. (Crossref)
Bačić Selanec, Nika, and Petrić, Davor. “Reshaping National Judiciaries under Article 19(1) TEU: The Grand Chamber’s Decision in Hann-Invest.” EU Law Live. The Week, no. 35 (2024). Accessed April 25, 2025. https://eulawlive.com/oped-reshaping-national-judiciaries-under-article-191-teu-the-grand-chambersdecision-in-hann-invest.
Bačić Selanec, Nika, Iris Goldner Lang, and Petrić, Davor. “Rule of Law in the EU and the State of Croatian Judiciary.” In Crisis Era European Integration: Economic, Political and Social Lessons from Croatia, edited by Jakša Puljiz and Hrvoje Butković, 77–96. London: Routledge, 2024. (Crossref)
Barbić, Jakša. “Administration of Justice and the Rule of Law in the Republic of Croatia.” Croatian Academy of Legal Sciences Yearbook 13, no. 1 (2022): 161–72.
Cassani, Andrea, and Tomini, Luca. “Reversing Regimes and Concepts: From Democratization to Autocratization.” European Political Science 19, no. 3 (2020): 272–87. (Crossref)
Čehulić, Mateja, and Čepo, Dario. “Hiding behind Digitalization: Judiciary Reform Strategies.” In .La Europa de los valores? El declive del Estado de Derecho en la UE, edited by Susana Sanz-Caballero, 371–92. Navarra: Aranzadi, 2023.
Đaković, Tina. Policy Insight: Partial Reforms and Incomplete Europeanisation – Croatia’s Experience in Conducting Reforms in the Context of the Chapter 23 Negotiations with the EU. Skopje: European Policy Institute. https://epi.org.mk/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Insight-_Partial-Reforms-and-Incomplete-Europeanisation_Croatia’s-Experience-in-Conducting-Reforms-in-the-Context-of-.pdf.
Dauses, Manfred A. “La Protection des Droits Fondamentaux dans l’Ordre Juridique Communautaire.” Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Europeen, no. 3 (1984): 401–24.
Gyöngyi, Petra M. “Judicial Reforms in Hungary and Romania. The Challenging Implementation of EU Rule of Law Standards.” PhD diss., Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2019.
Jambrač, Josip. “Croatian Post-Socialist Transition or Transformation: Lost in Translation.” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 20, no. 4 (2020): 649–76. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.20.4.3. (Crossref)
Kochenov, Dimitry. EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2008.
Kochenov, Dimitry, and Bard, Petra. “Rule of Law Crisis in the New Member States of the EU: The Pitfalls of Overemphasising Enforcement.” Reconnect Working Paper, no. 1 (2018). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3221240.
Moitinho de Almeida, José C. “La Protección de los Derechos Fundamentales en la Jurisprudencia del TJCE.” In El Derecho Comunitario Europeo y su Aplicacion Judicial, edited by Gil C. Rodríguez Iglesias and Diego J. Linán Nogueras, 97–131. Madrid: Cívitas, 1993.
Schmidt, Alessandro. “When the Threat Comes from Home: The Grand Chamber’s Review of the Croatian Judicial Uniformity Mechanism under Article 19 (1) TEU in Hann-Invest.” BlogDUE, November 5, 2024. Accessed April 25, 2025. https://www.aisdue.eu/alessandro-schmidt-when-the-threat-comes-fromhome-the-grand-chambers-review-of-the-croatian-judicial-uniformity-mechanism-under-article-19-1-teu-in-hann-invest/.
Wakelin, Elyse. “EU Conditionality: An Effective Means for Policy Reform?,” November 2013. Accessed April 25, 2025. https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/43900.
de Werd, Marc. “Uninvited Oversight: Judges Watching Judges – The ECJ Hann- Invest Case.” Amsterdam Centre on the Legal Professions and Access to Justice, July 16, 2024. Accessed April 25, 2025. https://aclpa.uva.nl/en/content/news/2024/07/blog-marc-de-werd.html?cb.
Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-0300
