Rethinking Conscientious Objection to Mandatory Vaccination

Ivana Tucak

University of Osijek , Chorwacja
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9694-2315

Josip Berdica

University of Osijek , Chorwacja
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-0326


Abstrakt

Among the member states of the Council of Europe, there is a consensus on the importance of vaccination as a successful and effective preventive health intervention. Every state aims to achieve herd immunity, i.e., a high vaccination rate of the population that will prevent the circulation of contagious diseases in the population and thus protect those who cannot be vaccinated due to age or poor health. However, despite the general recognition of the importance of vaccination, there is no consensus on a “single model” of how best to achieve the goals of mass immunization. Countries have different public health policies, so while the vaccination policy of some members of the Council of Europe is limited to a recommendation, others have made vaccination compulsory. Today, there are many opponents of vaccination and those who are hesitant. This paper will focus on those who refuse to be vaccinated based on a moral understanding of how to act in certain circumstances. The paper will explore whether countries imposing mandatory vaccination, with financial or other sanctions imposed in the case of non-compliance, should recognize the right to conscientious objection. This includes the right of adults to refuse vaccination, and respecting the religious and philosophical beliefs of parents who refuse to vaccinate their children. The article consists of two main parts. The first part will explore the legal-theoretical and legal-philosophical dimensions of the relationship between justice and conscience, with special emphasis on the interpretation of this relationship provided by the American political philosopher John Rawls. The second part of the paper will examine the issue of compulsory vaccination and conscientious objection through the prism of the rights provided for in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Słowa kluczowe:

justice, European Court of Human Rights, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, conscientious objection

Bačić, Arsen. Leksikon Ustava Republike Hrvatske. Split: Pravni fakultet u Splitu, 2000.

Berdica, Josip. Pravednost i mišljenje kao prve vrline. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk, 2024.

Berdyaev, Nicolas. The Meaning of the Creative Act. Translated by Donald A. Lowrie. New York: Collier Books, 1962.

Bobio, Norberto. Doba prava: Dvanaest eseja o ljudskim pravima. Translated by Danijela Maksimović. Beograd: Službeni Glasnik, 2008.

Brzozowski, Wojciech. “The Midwife’s Tale: Conscientious Objection to Abortion after Grimmark and Steen.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 10, no. 2 (2021): 298–316.

Clarke, Steve, Alberto Giubilini, and Mary Jean Walker. “Conscientious Objection to Vaccination.” Bioethics 31, no. 3 (March 2017): 155–61.

Harari, Yuval N. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. London: Vintage Books, 2014.

Jones, Owen D., and Timothy H. Goldsmith. “Law and Behavioral Biology.” Columbia Law Review 105, no. 2 (March 2005): 405–502.

Kindlová, Miluše, and Ondřej Preuss. “Conscientious Objection to Compulsory Vaccination? Lessons from the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights and a Test Employed by the Czech Constitutional Court.” ICL Journal 16, no. 4 (2022): 447–69.

Kurelić, Zoran. “Pretpostavlja li Rawlsova koncepcija preklapajućega konsenzusa individualnu shizofreniju?.” Politička misao 40, no. 1 (2003): 41–6.

Leigh, Ian. “Vaccination, Conscientious Objection and Human Rights.” Legal Studies 43, no. 2 (2023): 201–20.

Lyons, David. “Conscientious Refusal.” In The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, edited by Jon Mandle and David A. Reidy, 139–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Oppenheimer, Franz. The State: It’s History and Development Viewed Sociologically. Translated by John M. Gitterman. New York: Vanguard Press, 1926.

Pezo, Vladimir, ed. Pravni leksikon. Zagreb: Leksikografski zavod Miroslav Krleža, 2007.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge – Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.

Rowbotham, Judith. “Legislating for Your Own Good: Criminalising Moral Choice, The Modern Echoes of the Victorian Vaccination Acts.” The Liverpool Law Review 30 (2009): 13–33.

Salmon, Daniel A., Stephen P. Teret, C Raina MacIntyre, David Salisbury, Margaret A. Burgess, and Neal A. Halsey. “Compulsory Vaccination and Conscientious or Philosophical Exemptions: Past, Present and Future.” Lancet 367 (2006): 436–42.

Sen, Amartya. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2009.

“States With Religious and Philosophical Exemptions From School Immunization Requirements.” National Conference of State Legislatures. Accessed February 1, 2024, https://www.ncsl.org/health/states-with-religious-and-philosophical-exemptions-from-school-immunization-requirements#:~:text=Currently%2C%2015%20states%20allow%20philosophical,Advisory%20Committee%20on%20Immunization%20Practices.

Teehan, John. In the Name of God: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Ethics and Violence. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.

Trispiotis, Ilias. “Mandatory Vaccinations, Religious Freedom, and Discrimination.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 11 (2022): 145–64.

Tucak, Ivana. “Obvezno cijepljenje djece: za i protiv.” In Suvremeno obiteljsko pravo i postupak, edited by Branka Rešetar et al., 137–65. Osijek: Pravni fakultet Osijek, 2017.

Vinceti, Silvio Roberto. “COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination and the European Court of Human Rights.” Acta bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis 92, no. 6 (2021): e2021472. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12333.

Vukadin, Dragan. “Pravo prigovora savjesti.” Filozofska istraživanja 23, no. 2 (2003): 417–31.


Opublikowane
2024-06-28


Tucak, I., & Berdica, J. (2024). Rethinking Conscientious Objection to Mandatory Vaccination. Review of European and Comparative Law, 57(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.17449

Josip Berdica 
University of Osijek

Josip Berdica, Full Professor, Faculty of Law Osijek, University of Osijek,

Correspondence address: Stjepana Radića 13, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia;

e-mail: jberdica@pravos.hr; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-0326

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-0326



Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.